Literature DB >> 29126128

Identification of the Optimal Protocol for Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients With Treated Hypertension.

Myles N Moore1, Martin G Schultz1, Mark R Nelson1, J Andrew Black1,2, Nathan B Dwyer1,2, Ella Hoban1, Matthew D Jose1,2, Wojciech Kosmala1,3, Monika Przewlocka-Kosmala1,3, Jowita Zachwyc4, Petr Otahal1, Dean S Picone1, Philip Roberts-Thomson1,2, Panagiota Veloudi1, James E Sharman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) involving repeated, unobserved blood pressure (BP) readings during one clinic visit is recommended for in-office diagnosis and assessment of hypertension. However, the optimal AOBP protocol to determine BP control in the least amount of time with the fewest BP readings is yet to be determined and was the aim of this study.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients (mean age 62.8 ± 12.1 years; 50.3% female) with treated hypertension referred to specialist clinics at 2 sites underwent AOBP in a quiet room alone. Eight BP measurements were taken starting immediately after sitting and then at 2-minute intervals (15 minutes total). The optimal AOBP protocol was defined by the smallest mean difference and highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) compared with daytime ambulatory BP (ABP). The same BP device (Mobil-o-graph, IEM) was used for both AOBP and daytime ABP.
RESULTS: Average 15-minute AOBP and daytime ABP were 134 ± 22/82 ± 13 and 137 ± 17/83 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively. The optimal AOBP protocol was derived within a total duration of 6 minutes from the average of 2 measures started after 2 and 4 minutes of seated rest (systolic BP: mean difference (95% confidence interval) 0.004(-2.21, 2.21) mm Hg, P = 1.0; ICC = 0.81; diastolic BP: mean difference 0.37(-0.90, 1.63) mm Hg, P = 0.57; ICC = 0.86). AOBP measures taken after 8 minutes tended to underestimate daytime ABP (whether as a single BP or the average of more than 1 BP reading).
CONCLUSIONS: Only 2 AOBP readings taken over 6 minutes (excluding an initial reading immediately after sitting) may be needed to be comparable with daytime ABP. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; blood pressure monitoring; clinical decision making; diagnostic errors; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29126128     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpx180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  7 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement and Cardiac Target Organ Damage, A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Claudia Palomba; Simone Donadio; Grazia Canciello; Maria Angela Losi; Raffaele Izzo; Maria Virginia Manzi; Federica De Pisapia; Costantino Mancusi; Nicola De Luca
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-08-23

3.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Does automated office blood pressure require a 5-minute rest period when used to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Barry Stults; John Doane; Michael Jason Penrod; Molly B Conroy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Roerecke; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 44.409

6.  Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services.

Authors:  Shelley E Keating; Amandine Barnett; Ilaria Croci; Amy Hannigan; Louise Elvin-Walsh; Jeff S Coombes; Katrina L Campbell; Graeme A Macdonald; Ingrid J Hickman
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-06-07

7.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.