Literature DB >> 19808430

Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus.

Katsuaki Yokoyama1, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Dipen C Shah, Hendrik Lambert, Giovanni Leo, Nicolas Aeby, Atsushi Ikeda, Jan V Pitha, Tushar Sharma, Ralph Lazzara, Warren M Jackman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An open-irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter was developed to measure contact force (CF). Three optical fibers measure microdeformation of the catheter tip. The purpose of this study was to (1) validate the accuracy of CF sensor (CFS) (bench test); and (2) determine the relationship between CF and tissue temperatures, lesion size, steam pop, and thrombus during RF ablation using a canine thigh muscle preparation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: CFS measurements (total 1409) from 2 catheters in 3 angles (perpendicular, parallel, and 45 degrees ) were compared with a certified balance (range, 0 to 50 g). CFS measurements correlated highly (R(2) > or =0.988; mean error, < or =1.0 g). In 10 anesthetized dogs, a skin cradle over the thigh muscle was superfused with heparinized blood at 37 degrees C. A 7F catheter with 3.5-mm saline-irrigated electrode and CFS (Endosense) was held perpendicular to the muscle at CF of 2, 10, 20, 30, and 40 g. RF was delivered (n=100) for 60 seconds at 30 or 50 W (irrigation 17 or 30 mL/min). Tissue temperature (3 and 7 mm depths), lesion size, thrombus, and steam pop increased significantly with increasing CF at each RF power. Lesion size was greater with applications of lower power (30 W) and greater CF (30 to 40 g) than at high power (50 W) with lower CF (2 to 10 g).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel ablation catheter, which accurately measures CF, confirmed CF is a major determinant of RF lesion size. Steam pop and thrombus incidence also increases with CF. CFS in an open-irrigated ablation catheter that may optimize the selection of RF power and application time to maximize lesion formation and reduce the risk of steam pop and thrombus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19808430     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.803650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  142 in total

1.  Use of endogenous NADH fluorescence for real-time in situ visualization of epicardial radiofrequency ablation lesions and gaps.

Authors:  Marco Mercader; Luther Swift; Sumit Sood; Huda Asfour; Matthew Kay; Narine Sarvazyan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Measuring luminal esophageal temperature during pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Kunihiro Teramoto; Hiroki Kitajima; Naoto Nishina; Yoshitomi Kida; Hiroki Mani; Masahiro Esato; Yeong-Hwa Chun; Toshiji Iwasaka
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-26

3.  Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ulrich Krause; David Backhoff; Sophia Klehs; Heike E Schneider; Thomas Paul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  The importance of catheter stability evaluated by Visitag(TM) during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Ryudo Fujiwara; Kimitake Imamura; Yoichi Kijima; Tomoya Masano; Ryoji Nagoshi; Amane Kohzuki; Hiroyuki Shibata; Yoshiro Tsukiyama; Ryo Takeshige; Kenichi Yanaka; Shinsuke Nakano; Yusuke Fukuyama; Junya Shite
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® CATHETER - The Evidence So Far for Contact Force Technology and the Role of VISITAG™ MODULE.

Authors:  Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Tilz
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

6.  SmartTouch™ - The Emerging Role of Contact Force Technology in Complex Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Stephen P Page; Mehul Dhinoja
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2012-09

7.  Continuous ablation improves lesion maturation compared with intermittent ablation strategies.

Authors:  Albert J Rogers; Ryan T Borne; Grant Ho; William H Sauer; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan; Lijun Zheng; Duy T Nguyen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-04-27

8.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.