Literature DB >> 32142826

Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah H Averbach1, Yokabed Ermias2, Gary Jeng3, Kathryn M Curtis3, Maura K Whiteman3, Erin Berry-Bibee3, Denise J Jamieson4, Polly A Marchbanks3, Naomi K Tepper3, Tara C Jatlaoui3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide updated and more detailed pooled intrauterine device expulsion rates and expulsion risk estimates among women with postpartum intrauterine device placement by timing of insertion, delivery type, and intrauterine device type to inform current intrauterine device insertion practices in the United States. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies, of any study design, that examined postpartum placement of Copper T380A (copper) or levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine devices that reported counts of expulsion. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS
METHODS: We evaluated intrauterine device expulsion among women receiving postpartum intrauterine devices in the "immediate" (within 10 minutes), "early inpatient" (>10 minutes to <72 hours), "early outpatient" (72 hours to <4 weeks), and interval (≥4 weeks) time periods after delivery. We assessed study quality using the US Preventive Services Task Force evidence grading system. We calculated pooled absolute rates of partial and complete intrauterine device expulsion separately and estimated adjusted relative risks by the timing of postpartum placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type using log-binomial multivariable regression.
RESULTS: We identified 48 level I to II-3 studies of poor to good quality that reported a total of 7661 intrauterine device placements. Complete intrauterine device expulsion rates varied by timing of placement as follows: 10.2% (range, 0.0-26.7) for immediate; 13.2% (3.5-46.7) for early inpatient; 0% for early outpatient; and 1.8% (0.0-4.8) for interval placements. Complete intrauterine device expulsion rates also varied by delivery type: 14.8% (range, 4.8-43.1) for vaginal and 3.8% (0.0-21.1) for cesarean deliveries. Among immediate postpartum vaginal placements, the expulsion rate for levonorgetrel intrauterine devices was 27.4% (range, 18.8-45.2) and 12.4% (4.8-43.1) for copper intrauterine devices. Compared with interval placement, immediate and early postpartum placements (inpatient and outpatient combined) were associated with greater risk of complete expulsion (adjusted risk ratio, 8.33; 95% confidence interval, 4.32-16.08, and adjusted risk ratio, 5.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-10.85, respectively). Among immediate postpartum placements, risk of expulsion was greater for placement after vaginal compared with cesarean deliveries (adjusted risk ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval, 3.49-5.99). Among immediate placements at the time of vaginal delivery, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices were associated with a greater risk of expulsion compared with copper intrauterine devices (adjusted risk ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.65).
CONCLUSION: Although intrauterine device expulsion rates vary by timing of placement, type, and mode of delivery, intrauterine device insertion can take place at any time. Understanding the risk of intrauterine device expulsion at each time period will enable women to make an informed choice about when to initiate use of an intrauterine device in the postpartum period based on their own goals and preferences.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IUD; contraception; copper; delivery; early; expulsion; immediate; interval; levonorgestrel; postpartum

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32142826      PMCID: PMC7395881          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  69 in total

1.  Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.

Authors:  T Dias; S Abeykoon; S Kumarasiri; C Gunawardena; T Padeniya; F D'Antonio
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Levi; Evelyn Cantillo; Veronica Ades; Erika Banks; Amitasrigowri Murthy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa M Goldthwaite; Jeanelle Sheeder; Jennifer Hyer; Kristina Tocce; Stephanie B Teal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew L Zerden; Gretchen S Stuart; Samantha Charm; Amy Bryant; Joanne Garrett; Jessica Morse
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Impact of training level on postplacental levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device expulsion.

Authors:  Madeline Cole; Stephanie Thomas; Brian M Mercer; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation With a 2- to 3-Week Compared With a 6-Week Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; Melody Y Hou; Jennifer K Hsia; Catherine D Cansino; Juliana Melo; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Erika E Levi; Gretchen S Stuart; Matthew L Zerden; Joanne M Garrett; Amy G Bryant
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A randomised clinical trial to assess satisfaction with the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system inserted at caesarean section compared to postpartum placement.

Authors:  Kathleen Braniff; Edmund Gomez; Reinhold Muller
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.100

9.  Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.

Authors:  Ayhan Sucak; Sarp Ozcan; Şevki Çelen; Turhan Çağlar; Gonca Göksu; Nuri Danışman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  A novel approach to postpartum contraception: a pilot project of Pediatricians' role during the well-baby visit.

Authors:  Rachel Caskey; Katrina Stumbras; Kristin Rankin; Amanda Osta; Sadia Haider; Arden Handler
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-04-14
View more
  6 in total

1.  Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania.

Authors:  Gillian Eva; Judy Gold; Anita Makins; Suzanna Bright; Katherine Dean; Emily-Anne Tunnacliffe; Parveen Fatima; Afroja Yesmin; Projestine Muganyizi; Grasiana F Kimario; Kim Dalziel
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion.

Authors:  Mary Anne Armstrong; Tina Raine-Bennett; Susan D Reed; Jennifer Gatz; Darios Getahun; Juliane Schoendorf; Debbie Postlethwaite; Michael J Fassett; Jeffrey F Peipert; Catherine W Saltus; Maqdooda Merchant; Amy Alabaster; Xiaolei Zhou; Laura Ichikawa; Jiaxiao M Shi; Vicki Y Chiu; Fagen Xie; Shannon Hunter; Jinyi Wang; Mary E Ritchey; Giulia Chillemi; Theresa M Im; Harpreet S Takhar; Federica Pisa; Alex Asiimwe; Mary S Anthony
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Complications after interval postpartum intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Mariana Ramos-Rivera; Sarah Averbach; Praveena Selvaduray; Amanda Gibson; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Spontaneously Expelled Lippes Loop IUD After 40 Years of Use: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Temesgen Tilahun; Asfaw Tadesse; Rut Oljira
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2022-07-20

5.  Effect of Mirena Intrauterine Device on Endometrial Thickness, Quality of Life Score, and Curative Effect in Patients with Perimenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Zhi Zhou; Liping Wang; Jie Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  The negative impact of COVID-19 on contraception and sexual and reproductive health: Could immediate postpartum LARCs be the solution?

Authors:  Anita Makins; Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.