Literature DB >> 28885429

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation With a 2- to 3-Week Compared With a 6-Week Postpartum Visit.

Melissa J Chen1, Melody Y Hou, Jennifer K Hsia, Catherine D Cansino, Juliana Melo, Mitchell D Creinin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a department policy changing the scheduling of the postpartum visit from 6 weeks to 2-3 weeks after delivery is associated with higher long-acting reversible contraception initiation at the postpartum visit.
METHODS: We conducted a quasiexperimental before-after study to evaluate long-acting reversible contraception initiation, specifically an intrauterine device or contraceptive implant, at the postpartum visit between women scheduled for follow-up at 6 weeks (before policy change) and 2-3 weeks after delivery (after policy change). Secondary outcomes included postpartum visit completion, overall contraception initiation at the postpartum visit, overall contraceptive use at 6 months after delivery, and repeat pregnancies by 6 months postpartum. We obtained delivery and postpartum information using the electronic medical record and contacted participants 3 and 6 months after delivery to assess contraception use and repeat pregnancies.
RESULTS: We enrolled 586 participants between December 2014 and November 2015, of whom 512 women (256 in each cohort) continued to meet eligibility criteria after delivery. Long-acting reversible contraception initiation rates at the postpartum visit were lower in the 2- to 3-week (16.5%, 95% CI 12.2-21.8) compared with the 6-week group (31.1%, 95% CI 25.2-37.7, P<.01), primarily as a result of patient and health care provider preferences for delaying intrauterine device insertion to a later visit. More women completed a scheduled 2- to 3-week postpartum visit (90.2%, 95% CI 86.0-93.3) compared with a 6-week visit (81.6%, 95% CI 76.4-85.9, P<.01). Deferral of any contraception initiation was higher in the 2- to 3-week group (27.3%, 95% CI 21.9-33.4) compared with the 6-week group (15.8%, 95% CI 11.5-21.4, P<.01), but there were no differences in overall contraceptive use patterns at 6 months postpartum. No intrauterine device perforations or expulsions were observed in women who underwent insertion at 2-3 weeks postpartum. Five pregnancies were reported in each cohort by 6 months after delivery.
CONCLUSION: Scheduling a visit at 2-3 weeks after delivery was not associated with increased long-acting reversible contraception initiation at this visit despite higher postpartum visit attendance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885429      PMCID: PMC5610104          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Irene Woo; Sara Seifert; Dacia Hendricks; Roxanne M Jamshidi; Anne E Burke; Michelle C Fox
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Intrauterine device placement at 3 versus 6 weeks postpartum: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Maureen K Baldwin; Alison B Edelman; Jeong Y Lim; Mark D Nichols; Paula H Bednarek; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  The postpartum visit: it's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception.

Authors:  Leon Speroff; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.

Authors:  Joseph A Tony Ogburn; Eve Espey; Jody Stonehocker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel--intrauterine system at three time periods: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Joshua D Dahlke; Eric R Terpstra; Abigail M Ramseyer; Jeanne M Busch; Thomas Rieg; Everett F Magann
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Healthcare Provider Attitudes of Safety of Intrauterine Devices in the Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Lisa A Rauh-Benoit; Naomi K Tepper; Lauren B Zapata; Maura K Whiteman; Kathryn M Curtis; Michele G Mandel; Polly A Marchbanks; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Postpartum follow-up rates before and after the postpartum follow-up initiative at Queen Emma Clinic.

Authors:  Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Laurie Nakashima; Jan Yamamoto; Lynn Ngo; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-03

9.  Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew L Zerden; Gretchen S Stuart; Samantha Charm; Amy Bryant; Joanne Garrett; Jessica Morse
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Committee Opinion No. 666: Optimizing Postpartum Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Gurney; Sarita Sonalkar; Arden McAllister; Mary D Sammel; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin Bernard; Leping Wan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Sarita Sonalkar; Tegan Hunter; Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Progestin-only pill use over 6 months postpartum.

Authors:  Suji Uhm; Nuria Garcia-Ruiz; Mitchell D Creinin; Aubrey Blanton; Melissa J Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.