Literature DB >> 30452904

Impact of training level on postplacental levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device expulsion.

Madeline Cole1, Stephanie Thomas1, Brian M Mercer1, Kavita Shah Arora2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between provider training level and postplacental intrauterine device (IUD) outcomes following insertion instruction by email only. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a single-center chart review of demographics, insertion and clinical outcomes within 6 months of delivery for 116 patients who underwent postplacental levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD placement from October 1, 2016, to March 31, 2017.
RESULTS: We confirmed IUD retention, removal or expulsion in 87 of 116 (75.0%) patients by 6 months after delivery. Complete expulsion or removal for malposition occurred in 20 (23.0%) patients and more frequently after vaginal than cesarean delivery (30.2% vs. 4.2%, OR 9.93 [95% CI 1.25-78.96]) and when a postgraduate year (PGY) 1 physician placed the IUD compared to a PGY 2-4 or attending physician (37.5% vs. 14.5%, OR 3.52 [95% CI 1.25-9.94]).
CONCLUSION: Postplacental levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD expulsion rates are associated with provider training level as well as delivery route, though the individual association of each of these factors is difficult to ascertain given the high degree of collinearity between these two variables in our study.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery route; IUD expulsion; Postpartum contraception; Postplacental intrauterine device; Residency training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30452904      PMCID: PMC6351181          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  12 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs in Africa.

Authors:  C Morrison; C Waszak; K Katz; F Diabaté; E M Mate
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Levi; Evelyn Cantillo; Veronica Ades; Erika Banks; Amitasrigowri Murthy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Postplacental intrauterine device insertion at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Michele Marcus; Denise J Jamieson; Peggy Goedken; Carrie Cwiak
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement.

Authors:  Alyssa Covelli Colwill; Courtney A Schreiber; Mary D Sammel; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beatrice A Chen; Matthew F Reeves; Jennifer L Hayes; Heather L Hohmann; Lisa K Perriera; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

7.  Committee Opinion No. 670: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Postpartum contraception: a missed opportunity to prevent unintended pregnancy and short inter-pregnancy intervals.

Authors:  Rebecca Heller; Sharon Cameron; Rosie Briggs; Norma Forson; Anna Glasier
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-12-08

9.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.

Authors:  Ayhan Sucak; Sarp Ozcan; Şevki Çelen; Turhan Çağlar; Gonca Göksu; Nuri Danışman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.

Authors:  David Sheyn; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-05-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.