Literature DB >> 32139401

Computationally Derived Image Signature of Stromal Morphology Is Prognostic of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Following Prostatectomy in African American Patients.

Hersh K Bhargava1, Patrick Leo2, Robin Elliott3, Andrew Janowczyk2, Jon Whitney2, Sanjay Gupta4,5, Pingfu Fu6, Kosj Yamoah7, Francesca Khani8, Brian D Robinson8, Timothy R Rebbeck9, Michael Feldman10, Priti Lal10, Anant Madabhushi11,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Between 30%-40% of patients with prostate cancer experience disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Existing clinical models for recurrence risk prediction do not account for population-based variation in the tumor phenotype, despite recent evidence suggesting the presence of a unique, more aggressive prostate cancer phenotype in African American (AA) patients. We investigated the capacity of digitally measured, population-specific phenotypes of the intratumoral stroma to create improved models for prediction of recurrence following radical prostatectomy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: This study included 334 radical prostatectomy patients subdivided into training (VT, n = 127), validation 1 (V1, n = 62), and validation 2 (V2, n = 145). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from resected prostates were digitized, and 242 quantitative descriptors of the intratumoral stroma were calculated using a computational algorithm. Machine learning and elastic net Cox regression models were constructed using VT to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival based on these features. Performance of these models was assessed using V1 and V2, both overall and in population-specific cohorts.
RESULTS: An AA-specific, automated stromal signature, AAstro, was prognostic of recurrence risk in both independent validation datasets [V1,AA: AUC = 0.87, HR = 4.71 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-13.4), P = 0.003; V2,AA: AUC = 0.77, HR = 5.7 (95% CI, 1.48-21.90), P = 0.01]. AAstro outperformed clinical standard Kattan and CAPRA-S nomograms, and the underlying stromal descriptors were strongly associated with IHC measurements of specific tumor biomarker expression levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that considering population-specific information and stromal morphology has the potential to substantially improve accuracy of prognosis and risk stratification in AA patients with prostate cancer. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139401      PMCID: PMC7165025          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor controls androgen signaling and human prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Ankur Sharma; Wen-Shuz Yeow; Adam Ertel; Ilsa Coleman; Nigel Clegg; Chellappagounder Thangavel; Colm Morrissey; Xiaotun Zhang; Clay E S Comstock; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Leonard Gomella; Erik S Knudsen; Peter S Nelson; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms involving prostate cancer racial disparity.

Authors:  Cansu Karakas; Cassie Wang; Fangming Deng; Hongying Huang; Dongwen Wang; Peng Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2017-11-09

4.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  The role of the stromal microenvironment in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark S Condon
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 7.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Comparing the costs of radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy for the initial treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Burkhardt; Mark S Litwin; Christopher M Rose; Roy J Correa; Jonathan H Sunshine; Christopher Hogan; James A Hayman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prostate cancer susceptibility Loci identified on chromosome 12 in African Americans.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Stanley Hooker; Tshela Mason; Cathryn H Bock; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Stromal Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Development and Progression.

Authors:  Damien A Leach; Grant Buchanan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Ian Katz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

Review 2.  The state of the art for artificial intelligence in lung digital pathology.

Authors:  Vidya Sankar Viswanathan; Paula Toro; Germán Corredor; Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 9.883

3.  Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification via Nondestructive 3D Pathology with Deep Learning-Assisted Gland Analysis.

Authors:  Weisi Xie; Nicholas P Reder; Can Koyuncu; Patrick Leo; Sarah Hawley; Hongyi Huang; Chenyi Mao; Nadia Postupna; Soyoung Kang; Robert Serafin; Gan Gao; Qinghua Han; Kevin W Bishop; Lindsey A Barner; Pingfu Fu; Jonathan L Wright; C Dirk Keene; Joshua C Vaughan; Andrew Janowczyk; Adam K Glaser; Anant Madabhushi; Lawrence D True; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Bhavneet Bhinder; Coryandar Gilvary; Neel S Madhukar; Olivier Elemento
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 38.272

5.  Preoperative Radiomics Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced CT for Microvascular Invasion and Prognosis Stratification in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tingfeng Xu; Liying Ren; Minjun Liao; Bigeng Zhao; Rongyu Wei; Zhipeng Zhou; Yong He; Hao Zhang; Dongbo Chen; Hongsong Chen; Weijia Liao
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-03-20

6.  Risk subtyping and prognostic assessment of prostate cancer based on consensus genes.

Authors:  Jialin Meng; Yu Guan; Bijun Wang; Lei Chen; Junyi Chen; Meng Zhang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-03-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.