Literature DB >> 34853071

Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification via Nondestructive 3D Pathology with Deep Learning-Assisted Gland Analysis.

Weisi Xie1, Nicholas P Reder1,2, Can Koyuncu3, Patrick Leo3, Sarah Hawley4, Hongyi Huang1, Chenyi Mao5, Nadia Postupna2, Soyoung Kang1, Robert Serafin1, Gan Gao1, Qinghua Han6, Kevin W Bishop1,6, Lindsey A Barner1, Pingfu Fu7, Jonathan L Wright8, C Dirk Keene2, Joshua C Vaughan5,9, Andrew Janowczyk3,10, Adam K Glaser1, Anant Madabhushi3,11, Lawrence D True2,8, Jonathan T C Liu12,2,6.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer treatment planning is largely dependent upon examination of core-needle biopsies. The microscopic architecture of the prostate glands forms the basis for prognostic grading by pathologists. Interpretation of these convoluted three-dimensional (3D) glandular structures via visual inspection of a limited number of two-dimensional (2D) histology sections is often unreliable, which contributes to the under- and overtreatment of patients. To improve risk assessment and treatment decisions, we have developed a workflow for nondestructive 3D pathology and computational analysis of whole prostate biopsies labeled with a rapid and inexpensive fluorescent analogue of standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. This analysis is based on interpretable glandular features and is facilitated by the development of image translation-assisted segmentation in 3D (ITAS3D). ITAS3D is a generalizable deep learning-based strategy that enables tissue microstructures to be volumetrically segmented in an annotation-free and objective (biomarker-based) manner without requiring immunolabeling. As a preliminary demonstration of the translational value of a computational 3D versus a computational 2D pathology approach, we imaged 300 ex vivo biopsies extracted from 50 archived radical prostatectomy specimens, of which, 118 biopsies contained cancer. The 3D glandular features in cancer biopsies were superior to corresponding 2D features for risk stratification of patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer based on their clinical biochemical recurrence outcomes. The results of this study support the use of computational 3D pathology for guiding the clinical management of prostate cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: An end-to-end pipeline for deep learning-assisted computational 3D histology analysis of whole prostate biopsies shows that nondestructive 3D pathology has the potential to enable superior prognostic stratification of patients with prostate cancer. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853071      PMCID: PMC8803395          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   13.312


  57 in total

1.  A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 0.407

2.  iDISCO: a simple, rapid method to immunolabel large tissue samples for volume imaging.

Authors:  Nicolas Renier; Zhuhao Wu; David J Simon; Jing Yang; Pablo Ariel; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Virtual histological staining of unlabelled tissue-autofluorescence images via deep learning.

Authors:  Yair Rivenson; Hongda Wang; Zhensong Wei; Kevin de Haan; Yibo Zhang; Yichen Wu; Harun Günaydın; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Thomas Chong; Anthony E Sisk; Lindsey M Westbrook; W Dean Wallace; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 25.671

4.  Multi-resolution open-top light-sheet microscopy to enable efficient 3D pathology workflows.

Authors:  Lindsey A Barner; Adam K Glaser; Hongyi Huang; Lawrence D True; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Variability in Outcomes for Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 7, International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Group 2-3) and Implications for Risk Stratification: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Scott E Eggener; Alan W Shindel; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-03-11

Review 6.  VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Qi Dou; Lequan Yu; Jing Qin; Pheng-Ann Heng
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Automated segmentation and tracking of mitochondria in live-cell time-lapse images.

Authors:  Austin E Y T Lefebvre; Dennis Ma; Kai Kessenbrock; Devon A Lawson; Michelle A Digman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  SHIFT: speedy histological-to-immunofluorescent translation of a tumor signature enabled by deep learning.

Authors:  Erik A Burlingame; Mary McDonnell; Geoffrey F Schau; Guillaume Thibault; Christian Lanciault; Terry Morgan; Brett E Johnson; Christopher Corless; Joe W Gray; Young Hwan Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Computer Extracted Features from Initial H&E Tissue Biopsies Predict Disease Progression for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Sacheth Chandramouli; Patrick Leo; George Lee; Robin Elliott; Christine Davis; Guangjing Zhu; Pingfu Fu; Jonathan I Epstein; Robert Veltri; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The state of the art for artificial intelligence in lung digital pathology.

Authors:  Vidya Sankar Viswanathan; Paula Toro; Germán Corredor; Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 9.883

2.  In vivo microscopy as an adjunctive tool to guide detection, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin W Bishop; Kristen C Maitland; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 3.  EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment.

Authors:  Alex Friedlaender; Vivek Subbiah; Alessandro Russo; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Umberto Malapelle; Christian Rolfo; Alfredo Addeo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Beyond the snapshot: optimizing prognostication and prediction by moving from fixed to functional multidimensional cancer pathology.

Authors:  Cjh Kramer; Mpg Vreeswijk; B Thijssen; T Bosse; J Wesseling
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 9.883

Review 5.  Developing image analysis methods for digital pathology.

Authors:  Peter Bankhead
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 9.883

6.  Computational multiplex panel reduction to maximize information retention in breast cancer tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Luke Ternes; Jia-Ren Lin; Yu-An Chen; Joe W Gray; Young Hwan Chang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.