Yang Gu1,2, Jingbo Ma1, Yonglian Zhu2, Peng Xu1. 1. Department of Chemical, Biochemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, United States. 2. Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Abstract
Efficient microbial synthesis of chemicals requires the coordinated supply of precursors and cofactors to maintain cell growth and product formation. Substrates with different entry points into the metabolic network have different energetic and redox statuses. Generally, substrate cofeeding could bypass the lengthy and highly regulated native metabolism and facilitates high carbon conversion rate. Aiming to efficiently synthesize the high-value rose-smell 2-phenylethanol (2-PE) in Y. lipolytica, we analyzed the stoichiometric constraints of the Ehrlich pathway and identified that the selectivity of the Ehrlich pathway and the availability of 2-oxoglutarate are the rate-limiting factors. Stepwise refactoring of the Ehrlich pathway led us to identify the optimal catalytic modules consisting of l-phenylalanine permease, ketoacid aminotransferase, phenylpyruvate decarboxylase, phenylacetaldehyde reductase, and alcohol dehydrogenase. On the other hand, mitochondrial compartmentalization of 2-oxoglutarate inherently creates a bottleneck for efficient assimilation of l-phenylalanine, which limits 2-PE production. To improve 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) trafficking across the mitochondria membrane, we constructed a cytosolic aKG source pathway by coupling a bacterial aconitase with a native isocitrate dehydrogenase (ylIDP2). Additionally, we also engineered dicarboxylic acid transporters to further improve the 2-oxoglutarate availability. Furthermore, by blocking the precursor-competing pathways and mitigating fatty acid synthesis, the engineered strain produced 2669.54 mg/L of 2-PE in shake flasks, a 4.16-fold increase over the starting strain. The carbon conversion yield reaches 0.702 g/g from l-phenylalanine, 95.0% of the theoretical maximal. The reported work expands our ability to harness the Ehrlich pathway for production of high-value aromatics in oleaginous yeast species.
Efficient microbial synthesis of chemicals requires the coordinated supply of precursors and cofactors to maintain cell growth and product formation. Substrates with different entry points into the metabolic network have different energetic and redox statuses. Generally, substrate cofeeding could bypass the lengthy and highly regulated native metabolism and facilitates high carbon conversion rate. Aiming to efficiently synthesize the high-value rose-smell 2-phenylethanol (2-PE) in Y. lipolytica, we analyzed the stoichiometric constraints of the Ehrlich pathway and identified that the selectivity of the Ehrlich pathway and the availability of 2-oxoglutarate are the rate-limiting factors. Stepwise refactoring of the Ehrlich pathway led us to identify the optimal catalytic modules consisting of l-phenylalanine permease, ketoacid aminotransferase, phenylpyruvate decarboxylase, phenylacetaldehyde reductase, and alcohol dehydrogenase. On the other hand, mitochondrial compartmentalization of 2-oxoglutarate inherently creates a bottleneck for efficient assimilation of l-phenylalanine, which limits 2-PE production. To improve 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) trafficking across the mitochondria membrane, we constructed a cytosolic aKG source pathway by coupling a bacterial aconitase with a native isocitrate dehydrogenase (ylIDP2). Additionally, we also engineered dicarboxylic acid transporters to further improve the 2-oxoglutarate availability. Furthermore, by blocking the precursor-competing pathways and mitigating fatty acid synthesis, the engineered strain produced 2669.54 mg/L of 2-PE in shake flasks, a 4.16-fold increase over the starting strain. The carbon conversion yield reaches 0.702 g/g from l-phenylalanine, 95.0% of the theoretical maximal. The reported work expands our ability to harness the Ehrlich pathway for production of high-value aromatics in oleaginous yeast species.
Metabolic
engineering is the
enabling technology to rewire cellular endogenous metabolism for the
optimal production of native metabolites, or endow cells with the
capacity for synthesizing nonnative chemicals.[1] To date, there are numerous studies of engineering microbes for
production of commodity chemicals and natural products, including
the production of cannabinoids,[2] artemisinin,[3] taxol precursors,[4,5] branched-chain
alcohols,[6,7] ornithine,[8] arginine,[9] advanced biofuels,[10−13] and so on, from different host
organisms. The primary goal of metabolic engineers is to achieve high
titer, yield, and productivity (TYP) with improved cost-efficiency
and process economics.[14,15] In the past decades, a number
of prominent metabolic engineering strategies and methodologies have
been adopted to balance or redirect metabolic flux, such as modular
pathway engineering,[10] dynamic pathway
regulation,[16−19] cofactor engineering,[20,21] and scaffold-guided
spatial colocalization of metabolic enzymes,[22,23]et al. The spatiotemporal or ratiometric control
of enzyme expression have been proven as efficient strategies to relieve
metabolic burden and improve the TYP index.However, the complex
and lengthy synthetic routes from the starting
carbons, such as glucose, commonly generate low yield and suboptimal
productivity of desired products, which could be attributed to that
complex biosynthesis requires the coordinated supply of precursors,
ATPs, and reducing equivalents (NADPH/NADH) to maintain both cell
metabolism and product formation.[24,25] Substrates
with different entry points into the metabolic network have different
energetic and redox statuses,[24,26] which leads to pathway-dependent
product yields that critically affect cost-efficiency. Thus, providing
microbes with multiple carbon sources can potentially mitigate these
metabolic constraints, since it adds an additional degree of freedom
to cellular systems that can be leveraged for product formation (namely,
cosubstrate feeding).[26] One recent example
is to use the acetate-driven acetyl-CoA metabolic shortcut to bypass
the lengthy and highly regulated glycolytic pathway for efficient
polyketides[27] and lipids production.[24] Such substrate doping strategy may present a
metabolic advantage over a single substrate and lead to metabolic
optimality beyond what can be achieved in single substrate fermentations.
In other words, single substrate strategies may not be suitable for
particular metabolic engineering applications. Instead, metabolite
doping or cosubstrate feeding can overcome intrinsic pathway limitations
and achieve high carbon conversion efficiency and cost-efficiency.2-Phenylethanol (2-PE) is a high-value compound widely used in
the food, fragrance, and flavor industries. High-quality 2-PE is primarily
extracted from the volatile oil components of rose flower, with a
marketed price ranging from $150/kg to $200/kg, which suffers from
economics and scalability issues for sustainable production.[28] Chemically synthesized 2-PE, despite its low-cost
and high conversion rate, is largely rejected by consumers and IFF
society (International Flavors & Fragrances) due to safety and
health issues.[29] As a result, heterologous
production of 2-PE from microbial host is considered as an economically
viable alternative to plant extraction. Herein, Yarrowia lipolytica was chosen as the host strain because of its strong acetyl-CoA flux
and high TCA metabolic activity and the ease of genetic toolbox,[30] as demonstrated by its superior performance
for production of advanced biofuels and oleochemicals.[31] In addition, Y. lipolytica is
also a “Generally Regarded As Safe” (GRAS) organism
in the food and nutraceutical industry.[32]To demonstrate the utility of substrate cofeeding, we harnessed
the Ehrlich pathway of Yarrowia lipolytica to optimize
the biosynthesis of 2-phenylethanol (2-PE), with glucose and l-phenylalanine as the cosubstrates. The bioconversion process involves
deamination, decarboxylation, and aldehyde reduction (Figure ), with several aromatic byproducts
branched out from this pathway (Figure ). In particular, the deamination is an α-ketoglutarate
(aKG)-coupled amino transfer reaction and aldehyde reduction is a
NADH-dependent reduction reaction (Figure ). Both the aKG and NADH, as cofactors, are
derived from glucose. To improve the precursor flux and maximize 2-PE
production, we have applied a stoichiometric model to determine the
pathway yield and predict engineering targets (Supplementary Note). To improve the overall pathway specificity,
we characterized and reconfigured all the biochemical reactions in
Ehrlich pathway by stepwise pathway refactoring more than 20 enzymes,
and further blocked the competing pathways to eliminate any byproducts.
On the other hand, cytosolic 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) is the cofactor
to complete the amine transfer reaction. But aKG is derived from the
oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate that is primarily compartmentalized
in mitochondria, creating a bottleneck for efficient assimilation
of l-Phe, which limits 2-PE production. To improve metabolite
trafficking across the mitochondria membrane, we constructed an artificial
aKG source pathway in the cytosol, by coupling a cytosolic aconitase
with the overflowed citrate from mitochondria. In addition, we further
improved the aKG supply and 2-PE production by mitigating fatty acid
synthesis. As a result, the engineered strain (po1fk7P) produced 2669.54 mg/L of 2-PE with 0.702 g/g conversion yield from l-Phe, representing about 4.16-fold and 2.07-fold increase over
the starting strain (641.59 mg/L of 2-PE production with 0.339 g/g), respectively. Taken together,
refactoring critical enzymes and increasing metabolite trafficking
as well as mitigating competitive pathways are effective strategies
to improve the efficiency of overall pathway yield.
Characterization of Ehrlich Pathway for 2-PE
Synthesis in Y. lipolytica
Microbially produced
2-PE is mainly
obtained by two routes, namely, the de novo pathway
from glucose and bioconversion from l-phenylalanine by the
Ehrlich pathway. Owing to the hard-wired, tightly complex feedback
regulation[33] and lengthy reaction steps
(>20 steps) of the de novo pathway, bioconversion
by the Ehrlich pathway is considered as the preferred biological route
to synthesize 2-PE.[28] In the Ehrlich pathway
(Figure ), l-phenylalanine is converted to 2-PE through four enzyme-dependent
processes: (i) extracellular l-phenylalanine is internalized
by amino permeases; (ii) l-phenylalanine is transaminated
to phenylpyruvate by amino transferase with 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) as
the amine-receptor; (iii) phenylpyruvate is further decarboxylated
to phenylacetaldehyde by phenylpyruvate decarboxylases; (iv) and finally,
phenylacetaldehyde is reduced to 2-PE by alcohol dehydrogenases or
phenylacetaldehyde reductase with NADH as cofactor.In Y. lipolytica, transaminases and the phenylpyruvate decarboxylase
are ylARO8 (encoded by gene YALI0E20977g) or ylARO9
(encoded by gene YALI0C05258g) and ylARO10 (encoded
by gene YALI0D06930g), respectively. However, the
specific l-phenylalanine permease and phenylacetaldehyde
alcohol dehydrogenases have not been characterized. To determine the
ability of Y. lipolytica in producing 2-PE, Y. lipolytica po1g (leu–) harboring an
empty plasmid pYXLP′ (strain po1g pYXLP′) was used as control to incubate with different concentrations of l-phenylalanine (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 g/L) in shake flasks.
Our results (Figure a) indicate that the highest titer of 2-PE reached 720.43 mg/L with
0.342 g/g yield by adding
10 g/L l-phenylalanine, accompanying with 197.59 mg/L of
byproduct phenylacetate. Considering economic efficiency (incomplete
conversion of l-Phe), 4 g/L of l-phe was able to
support 641.59 mg/L (Figure b) of 2-PE production with 0.339 g/g yield (Figure c).
Thus, in the following work, 4 g/L of l-phe was determined
for bioconversion.
Figure 2
Initial assessment of using Y. lipolytica to produce
2-PE from l-phenylalanine via the Ehrlich
pathway. (a–c) 2-PE and phenylacetate titer, time profiles
of cell growth, and 2-PE yield of adding different concentrations l-phenylalanine (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 g/L). (d–f) 2-PE
titer, yield, and cell growth of respective overexpressing genes ylARO8, ylARO9, and ylARO10. All experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars show
standard deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01,
and ** indicates p < 0.05 (two-tailed test).
Initial assessment of using Y. lipolytica to produce
2-PE from l-phenylalanine via the Ehrlich
pathway. (a–c) 2-PE and phenylacetate titer, time profiles
of cell growth, and 2-PE yield of adding different concentrations l-phenylalanine (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 g/L). (d–f) 2-PE
titer, yield, and cell growth of respective overexpressing genes ylARO8, ylARO9, and ylARO10. All experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars show
standard deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01,
and ** indicates p < 0.05 (two-tailed test).
Refactoring the Upstream Ehrlich Pathway
to Improve 2-PE Yield
As suggested by the mathematical model
(Supplementary Note S1), improving the catalytic efficiency of the Ehrlich
pathway and increasing aKG supplementation are the key determinants
to improve 2-PE yield from l-phenylalanine. To refactor the
Ehrlich pathway, we adopted a stepwise pathway engineering strategy.
First, the native ylARO8, ylARO9, and ylARO10 genes in Ehrlich pathway were overexpressed
in Y. lipolytica po1g under the control of strong
constitutive TEF-intron promoter. Shaking flask cultivation (Figure d, and Figure e,f for cell growth and 2-PE
yield) indicates that overexpression of ylARO8 and ylARO9 (strain po1gP1 and po1gP2) has little effect on the 2-PE production. However, overexpression
of ylARO10 (strain po1gP3) increased
2-PE titer to 922.86 mg/L, about 33% higher than the control strain
(Figure d), suggesting
that the reaction catalyzed by phenylpyruvate decarboxylase ylARO10
is a limiting-step in Ehrlich pathway. Thus, the ineffectiveness of
overexpressing downstream genes (ylARO8 or ylARO9) is likely due to the limited performance of the
upstream ylARO10. Specifically, ylARO8 and ylARO9 are both transaminases,
which catalyze the transamination of l-phenylalanine with
different amine-receptors:l-Phenylalanine + 2-Oxoglutarate → Phenylpyruvate
+ l-Glutamate (catalyzed by YlARO8)l-Phenylalanine + Pyruvate → Phenylpyruvate
+ l-Alanine (catalyzed by YlARO9)Apparently, different amine-receptors (that is 2-oxoglutarate
and pyruvate) will lead to distinct outcomes (that is l-glutamate
and l-alanine) that may affect 2-PE production. Therefore,
we next constructed strains carrying pYLXP′-ylARO10-ylARO8 and pYLXP′-ylARO10-ylARO9 to identify the
optimal transaminases, and obtained po1gP4 and po1gP5. However, screening of these two strains showed no
significant differences in 2-PE production (Figure b, and Figure c,d for cell growth and 2-PE yield). We also overexpressed
a transcriptional activator (encoded by YALI0C18645) to up-regulate
the expression of ylARO8 or ylARO9.[29] However, cultivation of this strain
(po1gP6) showed deteriorated 2-PE production (Figure b). With this, we
speculated that cellular uptake of l-phe might be the bottleneck
limiting 2-PE titer.
Figure 3
Characterization of upstream module of the Ehrlich pathway: l-phenylalanine specific permeases and l-phe: 2-oxoglutarate
transaminase. (a) Flow-chart of shake flask cultivations of engineered
strains. (b–d) 2-PE titers, cell growth, and 2-PE yield of
respective overexpressing genes ylARO10 and ylARO8, ylARO10 and ylARO9, and ylARO10 and C18645. (e,f)
2-PE titers and 96h residual glucose of screening l-phenylalanine
specific permeases with CSM fermentation medium in shake cultivations.
All experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars show standard
deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01, and
** indicates p < 0.05 (two-tailed test).
Characterization of upstream module of the Ehrlich pathway: l-phenylalanine specific permeases and l-phe: 2-oxoglutarate
transaminase. (a) Flow-chart of shake flask cultivations of engineered
strains. (b–d) 2-PE titers, cell growth, and 2-PE yield of
respective overexpressing genes ylARO10 and ylARO8, ylARO10 and ylARO9, and ylARO10 and C18645. (e,f)
2-PE titers and 96h residual glucose of screening l-phenylalanine
specific permeases with CSM fermentation medium in shake cultivations.
All experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars show standard
deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01, and
** indicates p < 0.05 (two-tailed test).To facilitate the cellular uptake for l-phe, we assessed
a number of l-phe permease, including BAP and Gap1 from S. cerevisiae,[34] PheP from E. coli, and three Y. lipolytica native
Gap1 homologues, encoded by YALI0C17237g (named as GapY1), YALI0B16522g (GapY2), and YALI0B19800g (GapY3), respectively.
Beyond our expectation, all the tested l-phe permeases showed
decreased 2-PE production compared with control po1gP4 and po1gP5 when coupling with expression of ylARO8-ylARO10 or ylARO9-ylARO10 (Figure e). Noticeably, abundant
residual glucose was detected at 96 h (Figure f), suggesting the central carbon metabolism
of these strains was strongly inhibited. This result is consistent
with the finding that high level of endogenous l-phe induces
a strong down regulation of cellular metabolism in S. cerevisiae.[35] We reasoned that a similar effect
might exist in Y. lipolytica. Thus, we dropped out
all other amino acids and only used YNB-glucose with 4 g/L l-phe as the nitrogen source. As a result, the highest 2-PE titer
reached 1632.73 mg/L with 0.547 g/g yield in strain po1gP4–6 (Figure a,b) after 144 h cultivation, indicating
GapY3 is a potent l-phe permease. Nevertheless, differences
of 2-PE titers in strains po1gP4–6 and po1gP5–6 (1607.46 mg/L with 0.533 g/g) were insignificant, which may be attributed to the poor substrate
specificity of transaminases ylARO8 and ylARO9.
Figure 4
Characterization of the
downstream module of the Ehrlich pathway:
phenylacetaldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenases. (a,b) 2-PE
titers and yield by rescreening l-phenylalanine specific
permeases. Red 1, strain P4–1; Red 2, strain P4–2; Red 3, strain P4–3; Red 4,
strain P4–4; Red 5, strain P4–5; Red 6, strain P4–6; Black 1, strain P5–1; Black 2, strain P5–2; Black 3, strain P5–3; Black 4, strain P5–4; Black
5, strain P5–5; Black 6, strain P5–6. (c) Manipulations of whole-cell biocatalytic conversion of phenylacetaldehyde.
PAH, phenylacetaldehyde. (d–g) 2-PE titers, cell growth and
yield of screening and identifying the optimized phenylacetaldehyde
reductases or alcohol dehydrogenases. P8–1, strain po1gP8–1; P8–2, strain po1gP8–2; P8–3,
strain po1gP8–3; P8–4, strain po1gP8–4; P8–5, strain po1gP8–5; P8–6,
strain po1gP8–6. All experiments were performed
in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).
Characterization of the
downstream module of the Ehrlich pathway:
phenylacetaldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenases. (a,b) 2-PE
titers and yield by rescreening l-phenylalanine specific
permeases. Red 1, strain P4–1; Red 2, strain P4–2; Red 3, strain P4–3; Red 4,
strain P4–4; Red 5, strain P4–5; Red 6, strain P4–6; Black 1, strain P5–1; Black 2, strain P5–2; Black 3, strain P5–3; Black 4, strain P5–4; Black
5, strain P5–5; Black 6, strain P5–6. (c) Manipulations of whole-cell biocatalytic conversion of phenylacetaldehyde.
PAH, phenylacetaldehyde. (d–g) 2-PE titers, cell growth and
yield of screening and identifying the optimized phenylacetaldehyde
reductases or alcohol dehydrogenases. P8–1, strain po1gP8–1; P8–2, strain po1gP8–2; P8–3,
strain po1gP8–3; P8–4, strain po1gP8–4; P8–5, strain po1gP8–5; P8–6,
strain po1gP8–6. All experiments were performed
in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).
Refactoring the Downstream Ehrlich Pathway to Improve 2-PE Yield
To refactor the optimal alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) or phenylacetaldehyde
reductase (PAR), we screened the entire genome of Y. lipolytica with putative rose phenylacetaldehyde reductase PARL as the template,
and identified eight PARs with high similarity (>70%), encoded
by YALI0D08844g (PAR1), YALI0F09097g (PAR2), YALI0F24937g (PAR3), YALI0D07062g (PAR4), YALI0D12386g (PAR5), YALI0C20251g (PAR6), YALI0D11616g (PAR7), and YALI0D08778g (PAR8), respectively. We also codon-optimized and
synthesized
the rose-derived PARL as a positive control. The
resulting 9 strains, with overexpression of PAR1, PAR2, PAR3, PAR4, PAR5, PAR6, PAR7, PAR8, and PARL, were incubated with 1 g/L phenylacetaldehyde (Figure c), leading to 2-PE
titers of 762.71, 703.62, 759.37, 786.58, 435.61, 437.33, 399.11,
501.10, and 379.28 mg/L (Figure d), respectively. The highest 2-PE titer was produced
by strain PAR4 (YALI0D07062g). Interestingly,
the rose-derived PARL performed worst in our test.Similarly,
we also investigated the performances of alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs)
in Y. lipolytica. Nine Y. lipolytica ADHs annotated by Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and GRYC (http://gryc.inra.fr/) were tested, including ADH1 (YALI0D25630g), ADH2 (YALI0E17787g), ADH3 (YALI0A16379g), ADH4 (YALI0A15147g), ADH5 (YALI0E07766g), ADH6 (YALI0E15818g), ADH7 (YALI0D02167g), ADH8 (YALI1C17782g), and ADH9 (SFA1). The resulting strains were tested and only
suboptimal level of 2-PE were detected in these strains compared to
the strain harboring the optimal PARs (Figure d), and the best strain (ADH2) produced 723.74
mg/L 2-PE, which is about 10% lower than strain PAR4.After analyzing the downstream PAR and ADH modules, we chose six
efficient candidates for further investigation, including ADH2, ADH3,
PAR1, PAR2, PAR3, and PAR4. These PARs and ADHs were combined with
the optimal upstream module ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3,
leading to strains po1gP7–1, po1gP7–2, po1gP7–3, po1gP7–4, po1gP7–5, and po1gP7–6. When tested
in shake flask with YNB-glucose media and 4 g/L l-phenylalanine,
these strains produced 2-PE at 1126.62, 902.12, 1109.89, 1166.23,
960.96, and 1378.98 mg/L, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3), representing no improvements in 2-PE titer compared
to control po1gP4–6 (ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3, 1610.76
mg/L). We speculated that simultaneous overexpression of four genes
(>16 000 bp) may lead to genetic instability (loss of plasmid
or unequal distribution/propagation of plasmid) in Y. lipolytica. To test this hypothesis, we linearized these plasmids and integrated
the long DNA cassettes at the pBR docking site of po1g chromosome,
leading to strains po1gP8–1, po1gP8–2, po1gP8–3, po1gP8–4, po1gP8–5, and po1gP8–6, respectively.
Shake flask screening indicates that po1gP8–6 produced
1750.46 mg/L of 2-PE with 0.534 g/g yield (Figure f,g, and Figure e for cell growth), the highest titer obtained,
indicating PAR4 is the optimal downstream module that reduces phenylacetaldehyde
to 2-PE. So far, the four steps of the Ehrlich pathway (permeation,
transamination, decarboxylation, and reduction) have been fully refactored,
and the refactored pathway represents 2.4-fold increase in 2-PE titer
over the starting strain (∼710 mg/L).
Blocking Competing Pathways
to Improve 2-PE Titer
To
further improve 2-PE yield, we attempted to delete the competing pathways.
For the convenience of the genetic manipulations, we first knocked
out gene ku70 in po1f (named po1fk)
to inhibit nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and improve the frequency
of homologous recombination.As mentioned above, the major byproduct
is phenylacetate, which is the oxidized product of phenylacetaldehyde
catalyzed by aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALD2 and ALD3). Thus, we sequentially
knocked out both ALD2 (YALI0D07942g) and ALD3 (YALI0F04444g) in po1fk, obtaining strain po1fk1. Then the optimal
upstream and downstream Ehrlich module ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR3 was integrated at the genome pBR docking site of po1fk1, obtaining strain po1fk1P. Although shake flask cultivation
of po1fk1P showed no improvement in 2-PE titer, the byproduct
phenylacetate was significantly decreased to 124.49 mg/L (Figure b, 532.48 mg/L phenylacetate
in po1gP8–6).
Figure 5
Blocking competitive pathways and integration
of the Ehrlich pathway
in 26s rDNA sites to improve 2-PE production. (a–c) Cell growth,
2-PE titers, phenylacetate titers, and 2-PE yield of blocking competitive
pathways. (d) Screening of the productive strains based on 24-well
deep plate cultivations. (e,f) 2-PE titer and yield by further validating
productive strains with integration of the Ehrlich pathway in flask
cultivations. 1, strain po1fk4–1; 2, strain po1fk4–2; 3, strain po1fk4–3; 4,
strain po1fk4–4; 5, strain po1fk4–5; 6, strain po1fk4–6; 7, strain po1fk4–7; 8, strain po1fk4–8; 9, strain po1fk4–9; 10, strain po1fk4–10; 11, strain po1fk4–11; 12, strain po1fk4–12. All experiments were
performed in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).
Blocking competitive pathways and integration
of the Ehrlich pathway
in 26s rDNA sites to improve 2-PE production. (a–c) Cell growth,
2-PE titers, phenylacetate titers, and 2-PE yield of blocking competitive
pathways. (d) Screening of the productive strains based on 24-well
deep plate cultivations. (e,f) 2-PE titer and yield by further validating
productive strains with integration of the Ehrlich pathway in flask
cultivations. 1, strain po1fk4–1; 2, strain po1fk4–2; 3, strain po1fk4–3; 4,
strain po1fk4–4; 5, strain po1fk4–5; 6, strain po1fk4–6; 7, strain po1fk4–7; 8, strain po1fk4–8; 9, strain po1fk4–9; 10, strain po1fk4–10; 11, strain po1fk4–11; 12, strain po1fk4–12. All experiments were
performed in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).In addition, prephenate dehydratase PHA2 catalyzes
the anaplerotic
reaction from phenylpyruvate to prephenate (Figure ). Deletion of gene PHA2 in strain po1fk1 generated strain po1fk2. Chromosomally integrated (integrated at pBR docking site) Ehrlich
module (ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR3) in po1fk2 (strain po1fk2P) leads to an improved 2-PE titer of 1809.65 mg/L with
the yield at 0.570 g/g compared
to po1fk1P (Figure b,c, 1735.78 mg/L with yield at 0.550 g/g), but a significant decrease in biomass
was observed in po1fk2P (Figure a). On the other hand, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate
dioxygenase (encoded by gene ylHPD) could convert
phenylpyruvate to 2-hydroxyphenylacetate. Therefore, we further knocked
out ylHPD in strain po1fk2, obtaining
strain po1fk3. However, the chromosomally integrated
(integrated at pBR docking site) Ehrlich module in po1fk3 (strain po1fk3P) leads to decreased 2-PE production and increased
phenylacetate titer, which were 1432.43 and 226.17 mg/L (Figure b), respectively.
This result suggests that ylHPD cannot be knocked
out in this scenario. It is not clear why the deletion of gene ylHPD has a negative result, possibly due to the incorrect
annotation of the reaction directionality of ylHPD.We have refactored the Ehrlich pathway and blocked the byproducts
synthesis, and integrated the optimal gene module ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR3 to the pBR docking site of the triple knockout strain (po1fk2, ALD2, ALD3, and PHA2 were knocked out). In previous work, our group
has established a 26s rDNA/Cre-loxP-based iterative
gene integration and marker-curation method.[36] With more than 200 copies of ribosome DNAs in Y. lipolytica, this technique allows genes of interests to be randomly integrated
into the genome with multiple copies. Thus, we next sought to apply
this method and further optimize the Ehrlich pathway, including genes ylARO10, ylARO8, GapY3, and PAR4. To obtain a productive strain, we screened 144 genome-integrated
transformants by 24-well deep plate cultivation in glucose-YNB medium
with 4 g/L l-phenylalanine (Figure d). About 45% of the genome-integrated produced
2-PE at 900–1000 mg/L, less than 5% of the screened strain
produced 2-PE over 1200 mg/L. Then the top-performed strains were
further validated in shake flasks (Figure e,f). Strain po1fk4–2 produced the highest 2-PE of 1817.46 mg/L with the yield at 0.590
g/g.
A Nonnative 2-Oxoglutarate
(aKG) Shuttle to Improve Metabolite
Trafficking
As suggested by the mathematical model (Supplementary Note S1), we next sought to improve
the precursor (2-oxoglutarate, aKG) flux. Noteworthily, Y.
lipolytica is known for the strong TCA metabolic activity.[37] Indeed, we detected 4.84 g/L of citrate at 72
h of cultivation in strain po1fk4–2 (Figure b). Thus, rewiring
the overflowed citrate flux to cytosolic aKG is a feasible strategy
to increase precursor (aKG) supply and improve 2-PE production. Nevertheless, Y. lipolytica lacks the cytosolic aconitate hydratase and
isocitrate dehydrogenase. To construct the cytosolic pathway from
citrate to aKG (Figure a), we introduced two aconitate hydratases, including CitB from Bacillus subtilis and AcnA from E. coli, and a cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase ScIDP2 from S.
cerevisiae.[38] Additionally, by
searching the genome of Y. lipolytica with ScIDP2
as template, we retrieved a putative cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase
ylIDP2 (encoded by gene YALI0F04095g). Subsequently,
four nonnative aKG source pathways, including citB-scIDP2, citB-ylIDP2, acnA-scIDP2, and acnA-ylIDP2, were introduced into po1fk4–2 by plasmid pYLXP′. The resulting strains po1fk4P1, po1fk4P2, po1fk4P3, and po1fk4P4 produced 1733.45, 2146.45, 1737.58, and 1842.85 mg/L of 2-PE with
yield of 0.574, 0.606, 0.597, and 0.591 g/g in shake flasks (Figure c,d,e), respectively. It indicates the coexpression of citB and ylIDP2 could effectively convert
cytosolic citrate to aKG. In addition, we also overexpressed the mitochondrial
2-oxodicarboxylate carrier ylODC1 (encoded by gene YALI0D02629g) to export 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) out of the mitochondrial matrix
to the cytosol (strain po1fk4P5, po1fk4–2 harboring plasmid pYLXP′-citB-ylIDP2-ylODC). As expected, the 2-PE titer and yield in po1fk4P5 were further increased, reaching 2269.08 mg/L and 0.632 g/g (Figure a,b,c), respectively.
Figure 6
Overcoming cellular compartmentalization
of 2-oxoglutarate (aKG)
to increase aKG availability. (a) Construction of cytosolic source
for 2-oxoglutarate synthesis by coupling bacterial aconitase with
the overflowed citrate from Krebs cycle. (b) Citrate titers of strain po1fk4–2. (c–e) 2-PE titers, cell growth and
yield of strains po1fk4P1, po1fk4P2, po1fk4P3, and po1fk4P4. All experiments were
performed in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).
Figure 7
Improving 2-oxoglutarate trafficking across the mitochondria
membrane
by overexpressing the mitochondrial 2-oxodicarboxylate carrier ylODC1
and improving 2-PE titer by blocking fatty acid synthesis. (a–d)
2-PE titers, cell growth, yield, and lipid titers of strains po1fk4P5, po1fk5P, po1fk6P, and po1fk7P. All experiments were performed in triplicate and
error bars show standard deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01 (two-tailed test).
Overcoming cellular compartmentalization
of 2-oxoglutarate (aKG)
to increase aKG availability. (a) Construction of cytosolic source
for 2-oxoglutarate synthesis by coupling bacterial aconitase with
the overflowed citrate from Krebs cycle. (b) Citrate titers of strain po1fk4–2. (c–e) 2-PE titers, cell growth and
yield of strains po1fk4P1, po1fk4P2, po1fk4P3, and po1fk4P4. All experiments were
performed in triplicate and error bars show standard deviation (SD).Improving 2-oxoglutarate trafficking across the mitochondria
membrane
by overexpressing the mitochondrial 2-oxodicarboxylate carrier ylODC1
and improving 2-PE titer by blocking fatty acid synthesis. (a–d)
2-PE titers, cell growth, yield, and lipid titers of strains po1fk4P5, po1fk5P, po1fk6P, and po1fk7P. All experiments were performed in triplicate and
error bars show standard deviation (SD). The * indicates p < 0.01 (two-tailed test).On the other hand, Y. lipolytica is known to accumulate
up to 30–60% dry cell weight as lipid.[10,39] As shown in Figure b, production of 1 mol of fatty acids (stearic acids C18:0) will
consume 16 mol of NADPH and 9 mol of citrate (acetyl-CoA). As a result,
the synthesis of lipid competes with aconitase (aconitate hydratases)
and PARs for cytosolic citrate and NADPH. Specially, diacylglycerol
acyltransferases have been identified as the rate-limiting steps to
lipid synthesis via the Kennedy pathway in Y. lipolytica.[40,41] Thus, we pursued further
to knock out the diacylglycerol acyltransferases, encoded by ylDGA1 (YALI0E32769g) and ylDGA2 (YALI0D07986g), to mitigate fatty acid synthesis.
Shake flask cultivation of the resulting strain po1fk5P (po1fk4–2 ΔylDGA1::loxP harboring
pYLXP′-citB-ylIDP2-ylODC), po1fk6P (po1fk4–2 ΔylDGA2::loxP harboring pYLXP′-citB-ylIDP2-ylODC), and po1fk7P (po1fk4–2 ΔylDGA2
ΔylDGA1::loxP harboring pYLXP′-citB-ylIDP2-ylODC) all led to significant improvements
in 2-PE titers and yield (Figure a,b,c). Specifically, strain po1fk7P produced
2669.54 mg/L of 2-PE with yield at 0.702 g/g (Figure a,b,c),
which was 1.11-fold and 1.18-fold higher than strain po1fk4P5. Furthermore, to validate the impacts of ylDGA1 and ylDGA2 deletion on lipid production, we measured
the lipid titer in strains po1fk4P5, po1fk5P, po1fk6P, and po1fk7P (Figure d), reaching 3.93, 2.06, 2.08,
and 1.84 g/L, respectively. These results confirmed that fatty acid
synthesis was indeed mitigated by deleting genes ylDGA1 and ylDGA2. In conclusion, by constructing a cytosolic
aKG pathway and expression of the dicarboxylic acid transporter (ylODC)
as well as mitigating fatty acids synthesis, we efficiently improved
the aKG flux and 2-PE tier and yield.
Conclusions
Efficient
microbial synthesis of chemicals necessitates systematic
debottlenecking, refactoring and optimization of the native or nonnative
metabolic pathways. With 2-PE as a tested molecule, we analyzed the
stoichiometric constraints of the Ehrlich pathway toward efficient
synthesis of the target molecules in Y. lipolytica. The proposed metabolic model reveals potential engineering targets
for high yield production of 2-PE with cosubstrate feeding of glucose
and l-phenylalanine. Specifically, guided by the model, we
identified that the catalytic efficiency of the Ehrlich pathway and
the precursor 2-oxoglutarate (aKG) supplement might be the rate-limiting
steps. Stepwise refactoring the Ehrlich pathway and overcoming the
cellular compartmentalization of precursor (aKG) significantly improved
2-PE production. By blocking the precursor-competing pathways and
mitigating fatty acids synthesis, the engineered strain produced 2669.54
mg/L of 2-PE with yield at 0.702 g/g in shake flasks, which were 4.16
and 2.07-fold of the starting strain, respectively. The strategies
reported in this study should be adding value and guide us to engineer
other complex metabolic pathways for various biomanufacturing applications.Further investigations on relieving 2-PEtoxicity and promoting
cell fitness are viable solutions to improve 2-PE production. Major
considerations should include 2-PE tolerance/toxicity, medium composition,
and optimal fermentation processes. In general, mutagenesis coupled
with high throughput screening is an efficient and convenient way
to evolve tolerance phenotype.[42] In addition,
small amounts of organic nitrogen sources, such as peptone and yeast
extract, benefit cell growth without inhibiting the Ehrlich pathway.[43] Moreover, it was found that both Ca2+ and Mg2+ salts protect the cell and facilitate 2-PE production
by increasing membrane stability and integrity.[44] Besides, by adding organic solvents as overlays during
fermentation, 2-PE titer could be increased to 12.6 g/L in the concentrated
organic layer.[45] These strategies will
enable us to build a sustainable 2-PE platform at low cost and high
efficiency.
Materials and Methods
Strains, Plasmid, Primers, and Chemicals
All strains
of engineered Y. lipolytica, including the genotypes
of manipulations, recombinant plasmids, and primers, have been listed
in Supplementary Table S1 and S2. Chemicals
used in this study include phenylacetaldehyde, l-phenylalanine,
phenylacetate, 2-phenylethanol, 2-oxoglutarate, and citrate, which
were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Shake Flask and 24-Wells
Deep-Plate Cultivations
All
engineered strains were underwent optimal screening before shake flask
cultivations (see Yeast Transformation and Screening
of High-Producing Strains, Figure a). For shake flask cultivations, seed culture
was carried out in the shaking tube with 2 mL seed culture medium
at 30 °C and 250 r.p.m. for 48 h. Then, 0.8 mL of seed culture
was inoculated into the 250 mL flask containing 35 mL of fermentation
medium and grown under the conditions of 30 °C and 250 r.p.m.
for 144 h. One milliliter of cell suspension was sampled every 24
h for OD600, glucose, 2-PE, l-phenylalanine, and
penylacetate measurements. For performing 24-well deep-plate cultivation,
engineered Y. lipolytica strains were first cultured
in 96-wells pales with 150 μL seed culture medium at 30 °C
and 1000 r.p.m. for 36 h. Sequentially, 40 μL of seed culture
was inoculated to the 24-well deep plate with 2 mL fermentation medium
at 30 °C and 1000 r.p.m. for 96 h, and finally, 1 mL of cell
suspension was sampled for 2-PE, l-phenylalanine, and penylacetate
measurements.The seed culture medium used in this study was
the yeast complete synthetic media regular media CSM containing the
following: glucose 20.0 g/L, yeastnitrogen base (without ammonium
sulfate) 1.7 g/L, ammonium sulfate 5.0 g/L, and CSM-Leu or CSM-Ura
0.74 g/L. Two types of fermentation medium were used in our work,
including nitrogen-limited media CSM and YNB. The nitrogen-limited
media CSM contained the following: glucose 40.0 g/L, yeastnitrogen
base (without ammonium sulfate) 1.7 g/L, ammonium sulfate 1.1 g/L,
CSM-Leu 0.74 g/L, and appropriate l-phenylalanine. The nitrogen-limited
media YNB contained the following: glucose 40.0 g/L, yeastnitrogen
base (without ammonium sulfate) 1.7 g/L, leucine or uracil 0.2 g/L,
and appropriate l-phenylalanine.
Whole-Cell Bioconversion
of Phenylacetaldehyde
To prepare
the whole-cell biocatalyst, cells were harvested during the exponential
growth phase (48 h) from the shake flask cultivation. Then, cells
were washed twice with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and resuspended
to an OD600 of 4 in the same buffer. Next, whole-cell biocatalytic
conversion of phenylacetaldehyde was performed in 20-ml glass tube
containing 1 mL of cell suspension (OD600 = 4) and 1 mL
phenylacetaldehyde–water solution (2 g/L phenylacetaldehyde)
at 30 °C and 250 r.p.m. for 4 h. One hundred microliters of cell
suspension was sampled every 1 h for 2-PE and penylacetate measurements.
Yeast Transformation and Screening of High-Producing Strains
The standard protocols of Y. lipolytica transformation
by the lithium acetate method were described as previously reported.[36,46] In brief, 1 mL of cells was harvested during the exponential growth
phase (16–24 h) from 2 mL YPD medium (yeast extract 10 g/L,
peptone 20 g/L, and glucose 20 g/L) in the 14 mL shake tube, and washed
twice with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Then, cells were resuspended
in 105 μL transformation solution, containing 90 μL 50%
PEG4000, 5 μL lithium acetate (2 M), 5 μL boiled single
stand DNA (salmon sperm, denatured), and 5 μL DNA products (including
200–500 ng of plasmids, lined plasmids or DNA fragments), and
incubated at 39 °C for 1 h, then spread on selected plates. It
should be noted that the transformation mixtures needed to be vortexed
for 15 s every 15 min during the process of 39 °C incubation.
The selected markers, including leucine and uracil, were used in this
study. All engineering strains after genetic manipulations were performed
optimized screening by the shaking tube cultivations, and the optimal
strain was used to perform shaking flask (these data have been shown
in Supporting Information).
Expression
Vectors Construction and Pathway Assembly
The YaliBrick plasmid
pYLXP′ was used as the expression vector
in this study.[47,48] Plasmid constructions were performed
by using preciously described methods.[36,49] In brief,
recombinant plasmids of pYLXP′-XX (a single
gene expression) were obtained by Gibson Assembly method[50] using linearized pYLXP′ (digested by SnaBI and KpnI) and the appropriate PCR-amplified
DNA fragment. Multigenes assembly was achieved by restriction enzyme
digestion subcloning based on the application of isocaudamers AvrII and NheI.[47,51] All genes were respectively expressed by the TEF promoter with intron
sequence and XPR terminator. The modified DNA fragments and plasmids
were sequenced by Quintarabio. The endonucleases used in this research
were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific or NEB.
Gene Knockout
and 26s rDNA Genomic Integration of Ehrlich Pathway
A marker-free
gene knockout method based on Cre-lox recombination
system was used as previously reported.[52] For performing gene knockout, the upstream and
downstream sequences (both 1000 bp) flanking the deletion targets
were PCR-amplified. These two fragments, the loxP-URA-loxP cassette (digested from plasmid pYLXP′-loxp-URA by AvrII and salI), and the residual
plasmid backbone of pYLXP′-loxp-URA were joined
by the Gibson Assembly method, obtaining the gene knockout plasmids
pYLXP′-loxP-URA-XX. The obtained plasmids
were sequenced by Quintarabio. Next, the gene knockout cassettes were
PCR-amplified from construction plasmids pYLXP′-loxp-URA-XX, and further transformed into Y. lipolytica. The
positive transformants were determined by colony PCR. Next, plasmid
pYLXP′-Cre was introduced into the positive
transformants and promoted the recombination of loxP sites, which recycle the selected marker. Finally, the intracellular
plasmid pYLXP′-Cre was evicted by incubation
at 30 °C for 48 h.The standard protocol of 26s rDNA genomic
integration also has been described in previous reported.[36] For 26s rDNA genomic integration of the Ehrlich
pathway, the expression plasmid pYLXP′-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4 was digested by AvrII and NotI, and the fragment containing the Ehrlich pathway was inserted into
linearized pYLXP′-loxp-URA digested by Nhel and NotI, getting pYLXP′-loxp-URA-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4. The homologous arms
of 26s rDNA, including 26s rDNA 1s and 2s, were PCR-amplified by appropriate
primers. And next, these two homologous-arm fragments, Ehrlich pathway
with the loxP-URA-loxP cassette (digested from plasmid
pYLXP′-loxp-URA-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4 by AvrII and NotI), and the residual plasmid
backbone of pYLXP′-loxp-URA-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4 were joined by Gibson Assembly method, obtaining the 26s rDNA genomic
integration plasmids prDNAloxP-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4. Then, the 26s rDNA genomic integration cassette of the Ehrlich pathway
was gotten by digesting prDNAloxP-ylARO10-ylARO8-GapY3-PAR4 with AvrII and NotI, and the integration
cassette was further transformed into Y. lipolytica. In addition, the manipulation of recycling the selected marker
was similar to gene knockout.
Quantification of Cell
Density, 2-PE, Penylacetate, l-Phenylalanine, Glucose, Citrate,
Fatty Acid, and Y2-PE Calculation
Cell
densities were monitored by measuring
the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). The concentrations
of 2-PE, penylacetate, and l-phenylalanine were measured
by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) through Agilent HPLC
1220 equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 × 100
mm, 3.5 μm, Agilent) and a VWD detector. The analysis was performed
at 215 nm under 40 °C column temperature with a mobile phase
comprising 50% (v/v) methanol in water at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.
The concentrations of glucose and citrate were also measured by Agilent
HPLC 1220 equipped with a Supelcogel Carbohydrate column (Sigma, USA)
and a refractive index detector. H2SO4 (5 mM)
was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at 40 °C.
The method of quantification of fatty acid was used as previously
reported.[39] Y2-PE is
the 2-PE yield relative to the consumption of l-phenylalanine.
Authors: John E Dueber; Gabriel C Wu; G Reza Malmirchegini; Tae Seok Moon; Christopher J Petzold; Adeeti V Ullal; Kristala L J Prather; Jay D Keasling Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-08-02 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ahmad M Abdel-Mawgoud; Kelly A Markham; Claire M Palmer; Nian Liu; Gregory Stephanopoulos; Hal S Alper Journal: Metab Eng Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 9.783
Authors: Peng Xu; Qin Gu; Wenya Wang; Lynn Wong; Adam G W Bower; Cynthia H Collins; Mattheos A G Koffas Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Xiaozhou Luo; Michael A Reiter; Leo d'Espaux; Jeff Wong; Charles M Denby; Anna Lechner; Yunfeng Zhang; Adrian T Grzybowski; Simon Harth; Weiyin Lin; Hyunsu Lee; Changhua Yu; John Shin; Kai Deng; Veronica T Benites; George Wang; Edward E K Baidoo; Yan Chen; Ishaan Dev; Christopher J Petzold; Jay D Keasling Journal: Nature Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 49.962