Literature DB >> 3212839

Biological effects of shock waves: kidney haemorrhage by shock waves in dogs--administration rate dependence.

M Delius1, M Jordan, H Eizenhoefer, E Marlinghaus, G Heine, H G Liebich, W Brendel.   

Abstract

The effect of shock waves on normal canine kidneys was examined in two groups of dogs whose right kidneys were exposed to 3000 shock waves generated with 20 kV and 40 nF in a Dornier HM II lithotripter. The groups differed only in the rate of shock wave administration which was 100 and 1 per second, respectively. Autopsy was performed 24 to 30 h later. Macroscopically and histologically, significantly more haemorrhages occurred in the kidney parenchyma if shock waves were administered at a rate of 100 waves per second. Haemorrhages were diffuse, the outer medulla was most heavily affected. The results show that kidney damage is dependent on the rate of shock wave administration. They argue against a direct shock wave effect and favor cavitation as the mechanism of shock wave damage although thermal effects cannot be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3212839     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(88)90025-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  23 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  An efficient treatment strategy for histotripsy by removing cavitation memory.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Wang; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

7.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 9.  ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; P Alken
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

Review 10.  Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; K U Köhrmann; W Back; S Fröhner; M Raab; A Weber; F Kahmann; E Marlinghaus; K P Jünemann; P Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.