Literature DB >> 33468186

In silico imaging clinical trials: cheaper, faster, better, safer, and more scalable.

Aldo Badano1.   

Abstract

Imaging clinical trials can be burdensome and often delay patient access to novel, high-quality medical devices. Tools for in silico imaging trials have significantly improved in sophistication and availability. Here, I describe some of the principal advantages of in silico imaging trials and enumerate five lessons learned during the design and execution of the first all-in silico virtual imaging clinical trial for regulatory evaluation (the VICTRE study).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; In silico trials; Regulatory evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468186      PMCID: PMC7814719          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-05002-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of data augmentation via synthetic images for improved breast mass detection on mammograms using deep learning.

Authors:  Kenny H Cha; Nicholas Petrick; Aria Pezeshk; Christian G Graff; Diksha Sharma; Andreu Badal; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-22

2.  Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Full-Field Digital Mammography? A Multireader, Multicase Study of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Dianne Georgian-Smith; Nancy A Obuchowski; Joseph Y Lo; Rachel F Brem; Jay A Baker; Paul R Fisher; Alice Rim; Wei Zhao; Laurie L Fajardo; Thomas Mertelmeier
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Multireader multicase variance analysis for binary data.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Gene A Pennello; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Technical Note: In silico imaging tools from the VICTRE clinical trial.

Authors:  Diksha Sharma; Christian G Graff; Andreu Badal; Rongping Zeng; Purva Sawant; Aunnasha Sengupta; Eshan Dahal; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  An FDA Viewpoint on Unique Considerations for Medical-Device Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Owen Faris; Jeffrey Shuren
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

Authors:  Wang Kei Ma; Rita Borgen; Judith Kelly; Sara Millington; Beverley Hilton; Rob Aspin; Carla Lança; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an in-silico imaging clinical trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Rongping Zeng; Frank W Samuelson; Diksha Sharma; Andreu Badal; Graff G Christian; Stephen J Glick; Kyle J Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-26

8.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Stephen J Glick; Bob Liu; Aruna A Vedula; Samta Thacker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.

Authors:  Grant D Huang; Jonca Bull; Kelly Johnston McKee; Elizabeth Mahon; Beth Harper; Jamie N Roberts
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging Trial.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Christian G Graff; Andreu Badal; Diksha Sharma; Rongping Zeng; Frank W Samuelson; Stephen J Glick; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-11-02
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The 3D skull 0-4 years: A validated, generative, statistical shape model.

Authors:  Eimear O' Sullivan; Lara S van de Lande; Anne-Jet C Oosting; Athanasios Papaioannou; N Owase Jeelani; Maarten J Koudstaal; Roman H Khonsari; David J Dunaway; Stefanos Zafeiriou; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-11-29

3.  3-D Stochastic Numerical Breast Phantoms for Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of Ultrasound Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Fu Li; Umberto Villa; Seonyeong Park; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.