Literature DB >> 32114710

Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK.

Felicity K Boardman1, Corinna Clark1, Elsita Jungkurth2, Philip J Young2.   

Abstract

As population-level carrier screening panels for reprogenetic information emerge globally, conditions to be included, and the timing of implementation is widely debated. Thalassemia is the only condition for which population-based prenatal carrier screening is offered in the UK. However, little is known about the views and experiences of the UK thalassemia-affected community toward this screening or other forms of genetic screening for thalassemia (newborn, preconception), despite the range of direct consequences of screening programmes for this group. Using a mixed-methods integrative analysis (qualitative interviews n = 20 and quantitative survey n = 80), this study outlines the experiences and attitudes of adults with thalassemia, their family members, and screen-identified thalassemia carriers toward preconception, prenatal, and newborn screening for thalassemia. The majority of participants described thalassemia as a burdensome condition with a range of negative impacts, which contributed to their strong support for screening in all its potential formats. However, the data also highlight the challenges of each screening mode for this group, reflected in the high level of value conflict in participants' accounts and decisions. Cultural, social, and (to a lesser extent) religious factors were found to mitigate against the advantages of early screens, particularly within faith communities. Social stigma emerged as key to this process, informing the way that thalassemia severity was not only perceived, but also experienced by affected adults, which ultimately influenced screening uptake and outcomes. These findings suggest that cultural and social sensitivity is as important as the mode of screening delivery itself, if the iatrogenic and unintended harms of screening-particularly the social/psychological burden of value conflict-are to be adequately addressed and minimized.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United Kingdom; attitudes; beliefs; carrier testing; decision-making; disability; ethics; family; genetic counseling; lived experience; newborn screening; preconception; risk perception; stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32114710      PMCID: PMC7754126          DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.717


  43 in total

1.  Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening for thalassemia: a description of written information given to pregnant women in Europe and beyond.

Authors:  Ananda Van den Heuvel; Amelia Hollywood; Julie Hogg; Elizabeth Dormandy; Lyn Chitty; Madhulika Kabra; Runmei Ma; Bianca Masturzo; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Cure for thalassemia major - from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to gene therapy.

Authors:  Alok Srivastava; Ramachandran V Shaji
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Preconception and antenatal carrier screening for genetic conditions: The critical role of general practitioners.

Authors:  Martin B Delatycki; Nigel G Laing; Sarah J Moore; Jon Emery; Alison D Archibald; John Massie; Edwin P Kirk
Journal:  Aust J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03

4.  Premarital screening for thalassemia and sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nasser Abdulrahman Alhamdan; Yagob Yousaf Almazrou; Fahad Mohammad Alswaidi; Abdul Jamil Choudhry
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Attitudes towards genetic diagnosis in Pakistan: a survey of medical and legal communities and parents of thalassemic children.

Authors:  Ahmed I Gilani; Atif S Jadoon; Rabia Qaiser; Sana Nasim; Riffat Meraj; Nosheen Nasir; Fizza F Naqvi; Zafar Latif; Muhammad A Memon; Esme V Menezes; Imran Malik; Muhammad Z Memon; Syed F Kazim; Usman Ahmad
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

6.  Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for thalassaemia in pregnant Pakistani women in the North of England.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Josephine M Green; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences and expectations of participation.

Authors:  Vicki Tsianakas; Karl Atkin; Michael W Calnan; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Alison Shaw
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  "I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Nina van den Berg; A Cecile J W Janssens; Erwin Birnie; Lidewij Henneman; Wybo J Dondorp; Mirjam Plantinga; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Letter to the editor. Gene editing and disabled people: a response to Iñigo de Miguel Beriain.

Authors:  Felicity Boardman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  Factors Affecting the Willingness to Undertake Premarital Screening Test Among Prospective Marital Individuals.

Authors:  Ali Alkalbani; Maryam Alharrasi; Susan Achura; Ammar Al Badi; Amjad Al Rumhi; Khalid Alqassabi; Raya Almamari; Omar Alomari
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Cascade screening for beta-thalassaemia in Pakistan: relatives' experiences of a decision support intervention in routine practice.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Hussain Jafri; Muhammed Faran; Wajeeha Naseer Ahmed; Yasmin Rashid; Yasmin Ehsan; Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Attitudes toward population screening among people living with fragile X syndrome in the UK: 'I wouldn't wish him away, I'd just wish his fragile X syndrome away'.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.717

6.  Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Corinna Clark; Elsita Jungkurth; Philip J Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.