Literature DB >> 32113272

Combining partial information from speech and text.

Daniel Fogerty1, Irraj Iftikhar1, Rachel Madorskiy2.   

Abstract

The current study investigated how partial speech and text information, distributed at various interruption rates, is combined to support sentence recognition in quiet. Speech and text stimuli were interrupted by silence and presented unimodally or combined in multimodal conditions. Across all conditions, performance was best at the highest interruption rates. Listeners were able to gain benefit from most multimodal presentations, even when the rate of interruption was mismatched between modalities. Supplementing partial speech with incomplete visual cues can improve sentence intelligibility and compensate for degraded speech in adverse listening conditions. However, individual variability in benefit depends on unimodal performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113272      PMCID: PMC7030977          DOI: 10.1121/10.0000748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Erwin L J George; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

6.  Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Daniel Fogerty; Kimberly Smith; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Judith M Kessens; Marcel S M G Vlaming; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.