Vy Kim Nguyen1, Adam Kahana2, Julien Heidt2, Katelyn Polemi2, Jacob Kvasnicka2, Olivier Jolliet3, Justin A Colacino4. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Center for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: colacino@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stark racial disparities in disease incidence among American women remain a persistent public health challenge. These disparities likely result from complex interactions between genetic, social, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors. The influence of environmental risk factors, such as chemical exposure, however, may be substantial and is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We quantitatively evaluated chemical-exposure disparities by race/ethnicity, life stage, and time in United States (US) women (n = 38,080) by using biomarker data for 143 chemicals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014. METHODS: We applied a series of survey-weighted, generalized linear models using data from the entire NHANES women population along with cycle and age-group stratified subpopulations. The outcome was chemical biomarker concentration, and the main predictor was race/ethnicity with adjustment for age, socioeconomic status, smoking habits, and NHANES cycle. RESULTS: Compared to non-Hispanic White women, the highest disparities were observed for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and Other Race/Multi-Racial women with higher levels of pesticides and their metabolites, including 2,5-dichlorophenol, o,p'-DDE, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, and 2,4-dichlorophenol, along with personal care and consumer product compounds, including parabens and monoethyl phthalate, as well as several metals, such as mercury and arsenic. Moreover, for Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and non-Hispanic black women, there were several exposure disparities that persisted across age groups, such as higher 2,4- and 2,5-dichlorophenol concentrations. Exposure levels for methyl and propyl parabens, however, were the highest in non-Hispanic black compared to non-Hispanic white children with average differences exceeding 4-fold. Exposure disparities for methyl and propyl parabens are increasing over time in Other Race/Multi-Racial women while fluctuating for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic. Cotinine levels are among the highest in Non-Hispanic White women compared to Mexican American and Other Hispanic women with disparities plateauing and increasing, respectively. DISCUSSION: We systematically evaluated differences in chemical exposures across women of various race/ethnic groups and across age groups and time. Our findings could help inform chemical prioritization in designing epidemiological and toxicological studies. In addition, they could help guide public health interventions to reduce environmental and health disparities across populations.
BACKGROUND: Stark racial disparities in disease incidence among American women remain a persistent public health challenge. These disparities likely result from complex interactions between genetic, social, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors. The influence of environmental risk factors, such as chemical exposure, however, may be substantial and is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We quantitatively evaluated chemical-exposure disparities by race/ethnicity, life stage, and time in United States (US) women (n = 38,080) by using biomarker data for 143 chemicals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014. METHODS: We applied a series of survey-weighted, generalized linear models using data from the entire NHANES women population along with cycle and age-group stratified subpopulations. The outcome was chemical biomarker concentration, and the main predictor was race/ethnicity with adjustment for age, socioeconomic status, smoking habits, and NHANES cycle. RESULTS: Compared to non-Hispanic White women, the highest disparities were observed for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and Other Race/Multi-Racial women with higher levels of pesticides and their metabolites, including 2,5-dichlorophenol, o,p'-DDE, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, and 2,4-dichlorophenol, along with personal care and consumer product compounds, including parabens and monoethyl phthalate, as well as several metals, such as mercury and arsenic. Moreover, for Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and non-Hispanic black women, there were several exposure disparities that persisted across age groups, such as higher 2,4- and 2,5-dichlorophenol concentrations. Exposure levels for methyl and propyl parabens, however, were the highest in non-Hispanic black compared to non-Hispanic white children with average differences exceeding 4-fold. Exposure disparities for methyl and propyl parabens are increasing over time in Other Race/Multi-Racial women while fluctuating for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic. Cotinine levels are among the highest in Non-Hispanic White women compared to Mexican American and Other Hispanic women with disparities plateauing and increasing, respectively. DISCUSSION: We systematically evaluated differences in chemical exposures across women of various race/ethnic groups and across age groups and time. Our findings could help inform chemical prioritization in designing epidemiological and toxicological studies. In addition, they could help guide public health interventions to reduce environmental and health disparities across populations.
Authors: Muktar H Aliyu; Hamisu M Salihu; Louis G Keith; John E Ehiri; M Aminul Islam; Pauline E Jolly Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Lizbeth López-Carrillo; Raúl U Hernández-Ramírez; Antonia M Calafat; Luisa Torres-Sánchez; Marcia Galván-Portillo; Larry L Needham; Rubén Ruiz-Ramos; Mariano E Cebrián Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Arnold Schecter; Justin Colacino; Darrah Haffner; Keyur Patel; Matthias Opel; Olaf Päpke; Linda Birnbaum Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: S Hansen; M Strøm; S F Olsen; R Dahl; H J Hoffmann; C Granström; D Rytter; B H Bech; A Linneberg; E Maslova; H Kiviranta; P Rantakokko; T I Halldorsson Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Xindi C Hu; David Q Andrews; Andrew B Lindstrom; Thomas A Bruton; Laurel A Schaider; Philippe Grandjean; Rainer Lohmann; Courtney C Carignan; Arlene Blum; Simona A Balan; Christopher P Higgins; Elsie M Sunderland Journal: Environ Sci Technol Lett Date: 2016-08-09
Authors: Brooks Yelton; Heather M Brandt; Swann Arp Adams; John R Ureda; Jamie R Lead; Delores Fedrick; Kaleea Lewis; Shibani Kulkarni; Daniela B Friedman Journal: Int Q Community Health Educ Date: 2020-07-13
Authors: Alexander East; Peter P Egeghy; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Rachel Slover; Daniel A Vallero Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Patricia F Coogan; Lynn Rosenberg; Julie R Palmer; Yvette C Cozier; Yolanda M Lenzy; Kimberly A Bertrand Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Michael Aschner; Monica M B Paoliello; Aristides Tsatsakis; Aaron B Bowman; Jose G Dorea; Thomas Hartung; Jose L Domingo; Fernando Barbosa Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-12-26 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Danja Sarink; Adrian A Franke; Kami K White; Anna H Wu; Iona Cheng; Brandon Quon; Loïc Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Herbert Yu; Melissa A Merritt Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 9.031