Laura N Vandenberg1, Jennifer Bugos2. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 171C Goessmann, 686 N. Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA. lvandenberg@schoolph.umass.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 171C Goessmann, 686 N. Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parabens are chemicals containing alkyl-esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, which give them antimicrobial, antifungal, and preservative properties. Propylparaben (PP) is one paraben that has been widely used in personal care products, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food. In this review, we address the ongoing controversy over the safety of parabens, and PP specifically. These chemicals have received significant public attention after studies published almost 20 years ago suggested plausible associations between PP exposures and breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we use key characteristics, a systematic approach to evaluate the endocrine disrupting properties of PP based on features of "known" endocrine disruptors, and consider whether its classification as a "weak" estrogen should alleviate public health concerns over human exposures. We also review the available evidence from rodent and human studies to illustrate how the large data gaps that exist in hazard assessments raise concerns about current evaluations by regulatory agencies that PP use is safe. Finally, we address the circular logic that is used to suggest that because PP has been used for several decades, it must be safe. We conclude that inadequate evidence has been provided for the safe use of PP in food, cosmetics, and consumer products.
PURPOSE:Parabens are chemicals containing alkyl-esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, which give them antimicrobial, antifungal, and preservative properties. Propylparaben (PP) is one paraben that has been widely used in personal care products, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food. In this review, we address the ongoing controversy over the safety of parabens, and PP specifically. These chemicals have received significant public attention after studies published almost 20 years ago suggested plausible associations between PP exposures and breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we use key characteristics, a systematic approach to evaluate the endocrine disrupting properties of PP based on features of "known" endocrine disruptors, and consider whether its classification as a "weak" estrogen should alleviate public health concerns over human exposures. We also review the available evidence from rodent and human studies to illustrate how the large data gaps that exist in hazard assessments raise concerns about current evaluations by regulatory agencies that PP use is safe. Finally, we address the circular logic that is used to suggest that because PP has been used for several decades, it must be safe. We conclude that inadequate evidence has been provided for the safe use of PP in food, cosmetics, and consumer products.
Entities:
Keywords:
Generally recognized as safe; Margin of safety; Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety; Uterotrophic; Xenoestrogen
Authors: Kristen W Smith; Joe M Braun; Paige L Williams; Shelley Ehrlich; Katharine F Correia; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Jennifer Ford; Myra Keller; John D Meeker; Russ Hauser Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Xiaoyun Ye; Amber M Bishop; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Prabin Dhangada Majhi; Aman Sharma; Amy L Roberts; Elizabeth Daniele; Aliza R Majewski; Lynn M Chuong; Amye L Black; Laura N Vandenberg; Sallie S Schneider; Karen A Dunphy; D Joseph Jerry Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Luz M Iribarne-Durán; Francisco Artacho-Cordón; Manuela Peña-Caballero; José M Molina-Molina; Inmaculada Jiménez-Díaz; Fernando Vela-Soria; Laura Serrano; José A Hurtado; Mariana F Fernández; Carmen Freire; Nicolás Olea Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Michele A La Merrill; Laura N Vandenberg; Martyn T Smith; William Goodson; Patience Browne; Heather B Patisaul; Kathryn Z Guyton; Andreas Kortenkamp; Vincent J Cogliano; Tracey J Woodruff; Linda Rieswijk; Hideko Sone; Kenneth S Korach; Andrea C Gore; Lauren Zeise; R Thomas Zoeller Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Klara Matouskova; Gillian K Szabo; Jessica Daum; Suzanne E Fenton; Sofie Christiansen; Ana M Soto; Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Laura N Vandenberg Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Carmine Merola; Anton Vremere; Federico Fanti; Annamaria Iannetta; Giulia Caioni; Manuel Sergi; Dario Compagnone; Stefano Lorenzetti; Monia Perugini; Michele Amorena Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joshua P Mogus; Charlotte D LaPlante; Ruby Bansal; Klara Matouskova; Benjamin R Schneider; Elizabeth Daniele; Shannon J Silva; Mary J Hagen; Karen A Dunphy; D Joseph Jerry; Sallie S Schneider; Laura N Vandenberg Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.736