| Literature DB >> 32112229 |
Leonardo Cecchetti1, Tianshi Wang1, Ayla Hoogendoorn1, Karen T Witberg2, Jurgen M R Ligthart2, Joost Daemen2, Heleen M M van Beusekom1, Tom Pfeiffer3, Robert A Huber4, Jolanda J Wentzel1, Antonius F W van der Steen1,5,6, Gijs van Soest7.
Abstract
To quantify the impact of cardiac motion on stent length measurements with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and to demonstrate in vivo OCT imaging of implanted stents, without motion artefacts. The study consists of: clinical data evaluation, simulations and in vivo tests. A comparison between OCT-measured and nominal stent lengths in 101 clinically acquired pullbacks was carried out, followed by a simulation of the effect of cardiac motion on stent length measurements, experimentally and computationally. Both a commercial system and a custom OCT, capable of completing a pullback between two consecutive ventricular contractions, were employed. A 13 mm long stent was implanted in the left anterior descending branch of two atherosclerotic swine and imaged with both OCT systems. The analysis of the clinical OCT images yielded an average difference of 1.1 ± 1.6 mm, with a maximum difference of 7.8 mm and the simulations replicated the statistics observed in clinical data. Imaging with the custom OCT, yielded an RMS error of 0.14 mm at 60 BPM with the start of the acquisition synchronized to the cardiac cycle. In vivo imaging with conventional OCT yielded a deviation of 1.2 mm, relative to the length measured on ex-vivo micro-CT, while the length measured in the pullback acquired by the custom OCT differed by 0.20 mm. We demonstrated motion artefact-free OCT-imaging of implanted stents, using ECG triggering and a rapid pullback.Entities:
Keywords: Drug-eluting stent; Innovation; Optical coherence tomography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32112229 PMCID: PMC7228985 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01796-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Fig. 1Heartbeat OCT schematic: image acquisition is triggered by the ECG signal, completing the scan of the coronary artery between two subsequent heart contractions
Fig. 2Cardiac motion numerical simulation. a Simulation outline: the lines depict the position in time of stent edges and OCT catheters tip in time. b Simulation result: measured stent length values obtained at different pullback speeds with random trigger starts (true value 24 mm, 60 BPM, tissue velocity 10 mm/s). The black oval indicates the range of acquisition delays where Heartbeat OCT completes the pullback within the resting phase
Fig. 3Bench-top experiment schematic: a coronary stent in deployed in a PVC tube; the tube translates longitudinally during the OCT acquisition, simulating relative motion between imaging catheter and the imaged vessel
Fig. 4Heartbeat OCT triggering in the bench-top experiment, tissue speed. a 10 mm/s, b 40 mm/s
Fig. 5Nominal vs OCT-measured stent lengths in clinical data. a Regression analysis, b Bland–Altman plot
Fig. 6Numerical simulation of OCT-measured stent lengths, error ± standard deviation vs heart rate, for different tissue motion speeds. Nominal stent length 24 mm
In vitro experiment results, reported as average measurement error ± standard deviation
| Tube speed = 10 mm/s | Tube speed = 40 mm/s | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial OCT pullback speed 18 mm/s | − 0.1 ± 1.2 mm | 1.5 ± 4.5 mm |
| Commercial OCT pullback speed 36 mm/s | 0.3 ± 1.3 mm | − 0.5 ± 4.9 mm |
| Heartbeat OCT pullback speed 100 mm/s | − 0.30 ± 0.03 mm | − 0.1 ± 0.1 mm |
Fig. 7Cross-section images and 3D reconstructions of stents implanted in the LAD of two atherosclerotic swine. Top: OCT start synchronized to the ECG of the animal; bottom: asynchronous pullback
In vivo stent lengths, obtained with a µCT scanner, a commercial OCT system and the Heartbeat OCT system
| Nominal (mm) | Micro-CT (mm) | Commercial OCT (mm) | Deviation | Heartbeat OCT | Asynchronous high-speed OCT | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 12.80 | 14.0 | 1.2 | 13.0 | 0.2 | |
| 13 | 12.32 | 11.4 | − 0.9 | 11.5 | − 0.8 |