Literature DB >> 24272334

Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.

Yong Liu1, Kunihiro Shimamura, Takashi Kubo, Atsuhi Tanaka, Hironori Kitabata, Yasushi Ino, Takashi Tanimoto, Yasutsugu Shiono, Makoto Orii, Takashi Yamano, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Kumiko Hirata, Toshio Imanishi, Takashi Akasaka.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the higher accuracy of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) for quantitative measurements in comparison with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). However, those analyses were based on the cross-sectional images. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of FD-OCT for longitudinal geometric measurements of coronary arteries in comparison with IVUS. Between October 2011 and March 2012, we performed prospective FD-OCT and IVUS examinations in consecutive 77 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with single stent. Regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis revealed an excellent correlation between the FD-OCT-measured stent lengths and IVUS-measured stent lengths (r = 0.986, p < 0.001; mean difference = -0.51 mm). There was an excellent agreement between the actual stent lengths and the FD-OCT-measured stent lengths (r = 0.993, p < 0.001) as well as between the actual stent lengths and the IVUS-measured stent lengths (r = 0.981, p < 0.001). The difference between the actual stent lengths and the FD-OCT-measured stent lengths was significantly smaller than that between the actual stent lengths and the IVUS-measured stent lengths (0.15 ± 0.68 vs. 0.70 ± 1.15 mm, p < 0.001). Both FD-OCT (mean difference = -0.04 and -0.04 mm, respectively) and IVUS (mean difference = -0.06 and -0.06 mm, respectively) showed an excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility for the stent length measurements. In conclusion, FD-OCT provides accurate longitudinal measurement with excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility. FD-OCT might be a reliable technique for longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24272334     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0330-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sathyadeepak Ramesh; Aristotelis Papayannis; Abdul-rahman Abdel-karim; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil Brilakis
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Maoto Habara; Kenya Nasu; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hideaki Kaneda; Daisuke Yokota; Euihong Ko; Tsuyoshi Ito; Tairo Kurita; Nobuyoshi Tanaka; Masashi Kimura; Tatsuya Ito; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Etsuo Tsuchikane; Keiko Asakura; Yasushi Asakura; Osamu Katoh; Takahiko Suzuki
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Second-generation optical coherence tomography in clinical practice. High-speed data acquisition is highly reproducible in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Nieves Gonzalo; Guillermo J Tearney; Patrick W Serruys; Gijs van Soest; Takayuki Okamura; Héctor M García-García; Robert Jan van Geuns; Martin van der Ent; Jurgen Ligthart; Brett E Bouma; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.753

4.  Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis progression and regression at bifurcations using combined IVUS and OCT.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Josep Gomez-Lara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Nienke van Ditzhuijzen; Robert Jan van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07

5.  Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing coronary interventions for stent thrombosis.

Authors:  Fernando Alfonso; Jaime Dutary; Manuel Paulo; Nieves Gonzalo; Maria J Pérez-Vizcayno; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Javier Escaned; Camino Bañuelos; Rosana Hernández; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Qualitative assessment of neointimal tissue after drug-eluting stent implantation: comparison between follow-up optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kwon; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Tae-Hoon Kim; Jung-Sun Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong-Ki Hong
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Assessment of culprit lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: ability of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and coronary angioscopy.

Authors:  Takashi Kubo; Toshio Imanishi; Shigeho Takarada; Akio Kuroi; Satoshi Ueno; Takashi Yamano; Takashi Tanimoto; Yoshiki Matsuo; Takashi Masho; Hironori Kitabata; Kazushi Tsuda; Yoshiaki Tomobuchi; Takashi Akasaka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Guilherme F Attizzani; Vasile Sirbu; Giuseppe Musumeci; Nikoloz Lortkipanidze; Yusuke Fujino; Wei Wang; Sunao Nakamura; Andrej Erglis; Giulio Guagliumi; Marco A Costa
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Imaging the subcellular structure of human coronary atherosclerosis using micro-optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Linbo Liu; Joseph A Gardecki; Seemantini K Nadkarni; Jimmy D Toussaint; Yukako Yagi; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Seung-Ho Hur
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of the Balloon Inflation Time and Pattern on the Coronary Stent Expansion.

Authors:  Jarosław Skowroński; Rafał Wolny; Jan Jastrzębski; Paweł Tyczyński; Karol Szlazak; Jerzy Pręgowski; Gary S Mintz; Karolina Liżewska; Wojciech Świeszkowski; Zbigniew Chmielak; Adam Witkowski
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Magdy Algowhary; Salma Taha; Hosam Hasan-Ali; Akihiko Matsumura
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2019-12-19

4.  In-vitro and in-vivo imaging of coronary artery stents with Heartbeat OCT.

Authors:  Leonardo Cecchetti; Tianshi Wang; Ayla Hoogendoorn; Karen T Witberg; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Joost Daemen; Heleen M M van Beusekom; Tom Pfeiffer; Robert A Huber; Jolanda J Wentzel; Antonius F W van der Steen; Gijs van Soest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Efficacy of coronary imaging on bifurcation intervention.

Authors:  Kensuke Takagi; Ryoji Nagoshi; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Woong Kim; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Junya Shite; Yutaka Hikichi; Young Bin Song; Chang-Wook Nam; Bon-Kwon Koo; Soo-Joong Kim; Yoshinobu Murasato
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.