Literature DB >> 32105513

Safety and Accuracy of Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Jenna Sopfe1, Tim Vigers2,3, Laura Pyle2,4, Roger H Giller1, Gregory P Forlenza3.   

Abstract

Background: Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be at risk for malglycemia and adverse outcomes, including infection, prolonged hospital stays, organ dysfunction, graft-versus-host-disease, delayed hematopoietic recovery, and increased mortality. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may aid in describing and treating malglycemia in this population. However, no studies have demonstrated safety, tolerability, or accuracy of CGM in this uniquely immunocompromised population. Materials and
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted, using the Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, in patients aged 2-30 undergoing HSCT at Children's Hospital Colorado to evaluate continuous glycemia in this population. CGM occurred up to 7 days before and 60 days after HSCT, during hospitalization only. In a secondary analysis of this data, blood glucoses collected during routine HSCT care were compared with CGM values to evaluate accuracy. Adverse events and patient refusal to wear CGM device were monitored to assess safety and tolerability.
Results: Participants (n = 29; median age 13.1 years, [interquartile range] [4.7, 16.6] years) wore 84 sensors for an average of 25 [21.5, 30.0] days per participant. Paired serum-sensor values (n = 893) demonstrated a mean absolute relative difference of 20% ± 14% with Clarke Error Grid analysis showing 99% of pairs in the clinically acceptable Zones (A+B). There were four episodes of self-limited bleeding (4.8% of sensors); no other adverse events occurred. Six patients (20.7%) refused subsequent CGM placements. Conclusions: CGM use appears safe and feasible although with suboptimal accuracy in the hospitalized pediatric HSCT population. Few adverse events occurred, all of which were low grade.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous glucose monitor; Flash glucose monitor; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Pediatrics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32105513      PMCID: PMC7591371          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  30 in total

Review 1.  The original Clarke Error Grid Analysis (EGA).

Authors:  William L Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Hyperglycemia and length of stay in patients hospitalized for bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Rajesh Garg; Himanshu Bhutani; Edward Alyea; Merri Pendergrass
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients After Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Brandon M Nathan; Antoinette Moran; Ty B Dunn; Gregory J Beilman; Timothy L Pruett; Boris P Kovatchev; Melena D Bellin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Sensors: The Science Behind the Technology.

Authors:  Udo Hoss; Erwin Satrya Budiman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.

Authors:  Viral N Shah; Lori M Laffel; R Paul Wadwa; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018.

Authors:  Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Kellee M Miller; Mark A Clements; Michael R Rickels; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane; Richard Bergenstal; Elizabeth Smith; Beth A Olson; Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 7.  Practical Considerations on the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pediatrics and Older Adults and Nonadjunctive Use.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Nicholas B Argento; Lori M Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting.

Authors:  Jan Wernerman; Thomas Desaive; Simon Finfer; Luc Foubert; Anthony Furnary; Ulrike Holzinger; Roman Hovorka; Jeffrey Joseph; Mikhail Kosiborod; James Krinsley; Dieter Mesotten; Stanley Nasraway; Olav Rooyackers; Marcus J Schultz; Tom Van Herpe; Robert A Vigersky; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Flash Glucose Monitor FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Arndís F Ólafsdóttir; Stig Attvall; Ulrika Sandgren; Sofia Dahlqvist; Aldina Pivodic; Stanko Skrtic; Elvar Theodorsson; Marcus Lind
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 10.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges.

Authors:  Andrea Facchinetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  1 in total

1.  Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.