Literature DB >> 32103326

Prevention of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery with local antibiotic decontamination: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single center trial.

H M Schardey1,2, Ulrich Wirth3, T Strauss1,4, M S Kasparek1,5, D Schneider1, K W Jauch1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak and other infectious complications are septic complications of rectal cancer surgery caused by bacteria. Data from registry analysis show a beneficial effect of local antimicrobial administration on anastomotic leaks, but data are inconsistent in recent clinical trials. Therefore, our aim was to study the efficacy of topical antibiotic treatment on the incidence of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, single center trial was conducted. Patients received either placebo and amphotericin B or decontamination with polymyxin B, tobramycin, vancomycin, and amphotericin B four times per day starting the day before surgery until postoperative day 7. If a protective ileostomy was created, a catheter was placed transanally and the medication was administered locally to the anastomotic site. All patients received an intravenous perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
RESULTS: The trial had to be stopped for ethical reasons after first interim analysis with 80 patients instead of the initially planned 280 patients. Of the 40 patients randomized to receive placebo, eight (20%) developed anastomotic leak compared to only 2 (5%) in the treatment group of 40 patients (decontamination) with significant difference in the χ2 test (p = 0.0425). Twenty percent of the placebo group and 12.5% in the treatment group developed infectious complications not associated with anastomotic leak (p = 0.5312). One patient (2.5%) in the placebo group died (p = 0.3141).
CONCLUSION: Local decontamination with polymyxin, tobramycin, vancomycin, and amphotericin B is safe and effective in the prevention of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Bowel preparation; Local antibiotic therapy; Oral antibiotic bowel decontamination; Rectal cancer surgery; SDD

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32103326     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03544-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  47 in total

1.  A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Jaap Bonjer; Charlotte L Deijen; Gabor A Abis; Miguel A Cuesta; Martijn H G M van der Pas; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Antonio M Lacy; Willem A Bemelman; John Andersson; Eva Angenete; Jacob Rosenberg; Alois Fuerst; Eva Haglind
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Susanne Rogers; Kristina Haubensak; Stefan Schopf; Thomas von Ahnen; Hans Martin Schardey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus no bowel preparation for elective colectomy (MOBILE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, single-blinded trial.

Authors:  Laura Koskenvuo; Taru Lehtonen; Selja Koskensalo; Suvi Rasilainen; Kai Klintrup; Anu Ehrlich; Tarja Pinta; Tom Scheinin; Ville Sallinen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Juliette C Slieker; Freek Daams; Irene M Mulder; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce surgical site infection following elective colorectal resections.

Authors:  Jamie A Cannon; Laura K Altom; Rhiannon J Deierhoi; Melanie Morris; Joshua S Richman; Catherine C Vick; Kamal M F Itani; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life.

Authors:  Jean H Ashburn; Luca Stocchi; Ravi P Kiran; David W Dietz; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function.

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Daniel P Smith; Scott Christley; Jack A Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Andrea D Olivas; Benjamin D Shogan; Vesta Valuckaite; Alexander Zaborin; Natalya Belogortseva; Mark Musch; Folker Meyer; William L Trimble; Gary An; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mechanical bowel preparation with or without oral antibiotics for rectal resection for cancer (REPCA trial): a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aleksandra Olkina; Aleksei Karachun; Sergey Bagnenko; Alexey Belyaev; Aleksei Petrov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  Antibiotic Bowel Decontamination in Gastrointestinal Surgery-A Single-Center 20 Years' Experience.

Authors:  Josefine Schardey; Thomas von Ahnen; Emily Schardey; Alina Kappenberger; Petra Zimmermann; Florian Kühn; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner; Helmut Arbogast; Ulrich Wirth
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  The gut microbiota and colorectal surgery outcomes: facts or hype? A narrative review.

Authors:  Annamaria Agnes; Caterina Puccioni; Domenico D'Ugo; Antonio Gasbarrini; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Mucosa plication reinforced colorectal anastomosis and trans-anal vacuum drainage: a pilot study with preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Juraj Váňa; Marek Adámik; Adam Švec; Michal Žáček; Michal Demeter; Marián Grendár
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

5.  Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in colorectal surgery reduces anastomotic leakage and costs: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Bogner; Maximilian Stracke; Ulrich Bork; Steffen Wolk; Mathieu Pecqueux; Sandra Kaden; Marius Distler; Christoph Kahlert; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch; Johannes Fritzmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Anastomotic Leak: Toward an Understanding of Its Root Causes.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Hans Martin Schardey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Oral and Parenteral vs. Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: An Intervention Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sangiorgio; Marco Vacante; Francesco Basile; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24

8.  Mechanical plus oral bowel preparation with paromomycin and metronidazole reduces infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Matthias Mehdorn; Christoph Lübbert; Iris F Chaberny; Ines Gockel; Boris Jansen-Winkeln
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.