Literature DB >> 34089500

Mucosa plication reinforced colorectal anastomosis and trans-anal vacuum drainage: a pilot study with preliminary results.

Alexander Ferko1,2, Juraj Váňa3, Marek Adámik4, Adam Švec4, Michal Žáček3, Michal Demeter5, Marián Grendár6.   

Abstract

Dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis is a serious complication that is associated with increased mortality, impaired functional and oncological outcomes. The hypothesis was that anastomosis reinforcement and vacuum trans-anal drainage could eliminate some risk factors, such as mechanically stapled anastomosis instability and local infection. Patients with rectal cancer within 10 cm of the anal verge and low anterior resection with double-stapled technique were included consecutively. A stapler anastomosis was supplemented by trans-anal reinforcement and vacuum drainage using a povidone-iodine-soaked sponge. Modified reinforcement using a circular mucosa plication was developed and used. Patients were followed up by postoperative endoscopy and outcomes were acute leak rate, morbidity, and diversion rate. The procedure was successfully completed in 52 from 54 patients during time period January 2019-October 2020. The mean age of patients was 61 years (lower-upper quartiles 54-69 years). There were 38/52 (73%) males and 14/52 (27%) females; the neoadjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in a group of patients in 24/52 (46%). The mean level of anastomosis was 3.8 cm (lower-upper quartiles 3.00-4.88 cm). The overall morbidity was 32.6% (17/52) and Clavien-Dindo complications ≥ 3 grade appeared in 3/52 (5.7%) patients. No loss of anastomosis was recorded and no patient died postoperatively. The symptomatic anastomotic leak was recorded in 2 (3.8%) patients and asymptomatic blind fistula was recorded in one patient 1/52 (1.9%). Diversion ileostomy was created in 1/52 patient (1.9%). Reinforcement of double-stapled anastomosis using a circular mucosa plication with combination of vacuum povidone-iodine-soaked sponge drainage led to a low acute leak and diversion rate. This pilot study requires further investigation.Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.: Trial registration number is NCT04735107, date of registration February 2, 2021, registered retrospectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic dehiscence; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089500     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  51 in total

1.  Different Risk Factors for Early and Late Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in a Nationwide Audit.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Julia T van Groningen; Hester F Lingsma; Michel W J M Wouters; Anand G Menon; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: are we adequately remunerating them?

Authors:  S Q Ashraf; E M Burns; A Jani; S Altman; J D Young; C Cunningham; O Faiz; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Anastomotic leak and cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Karim; V Cubas; S Zaman; S Khan; H Patel; P Waterland
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Association of high ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after minimally invasive surgery for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Arman Draginov; Tyler R Chesney; Humzah A Quereshy; Sami A Chadi; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic mesorectal excision.

Authors:  E Hain; L Maggiori; G Manceau; C Mongin; J Prost À la Denise; Y Panis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Risk Factors Associated With Nonclosure of Defunctioning Stomas After Sphincter-Preserving Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Bingyan Wang; Fei Li; Jilian Wang; Wei Fu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Anastomotic leak following low anterior resection in stage IV rectal cancer is associated with poor survival.

Authors:  James D Smith; Jean M Butte; Martin R Weiser; Michael I D'Angelica; Philip B Paty; Larissa K Temple; José G Guillem; William R Jarnagin; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Rate of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Anastomosis Depends on the Definition: Pelvic Abscesses are Significant.

Authors:  B C Olsen; S T Sakkestad; F Pfeffer; A Karliczek
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.360

9.  The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hammond; Sangtaeck Lim; Yin Wan; Xin Gao; Anuprita Patkar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Leakage after Surgery for Rectum Cancer: Inconsistency in Reporting to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

Authors:  L Borly; M B Ellebæk; N Qvist
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-11-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of Transurethral Prostate Resection Instrumentation for Treating Low Rectal Anastomotic Leakage: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zhenming Zhang; Zhentao Hu; Yujie Qin; Jun Qian; Song Tu; Jiaxi Yao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.