Ulrich Wirth1,2, Susanne Rogers3, Kristina Haubensak3, Stefan Schopf3, Thomas von Ahnen3, Hans Martin Schardey3. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany. Ulrich.Wirth@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Ulrich.Wirth@med.uni-muenchen.de. 3. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage still presents an issue in rectal cancer surgery with rates of about 11%. As bacteria play a critical role, there is the concept of perioperative local decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage. METHODS: To ascertain the effectiveness of this treatment, we performed a retrospective analysis on 206 rectal resections with primary anastomosis and routine use of a selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) regimen for local decontamination. SDD medication was administered every 8 h from the day before surgery to the seventh postoperative day. All patients were treated according to the fast-track protocol without mechanical bowel preparation; instead, a laxative was used. RESULTS: Overall morbidity was 30%, overall mortality 0.5%. In our data, overall rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 5.8%, with 3.9% in anterior rectal resection and 6.5% in low anterior rectal resection group. In 75% of cases, anastomotic leakage was grade "C" and needed re-laparotomy. Surgical site infection rate was 19.9%. No serious adverse events were related to decontamination. CONCLUSION: Local antibiotic decontamination appears to be safe and effective to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery. Further focus should be on perioperative management including bowel preparation and choice of antimicrobial agents for local decontamination.
PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage still presents an issue in rectal cancer surgery with rates of about 11%. As bacteria play a critical role, there is the concept of perioperative local decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage. METHODS: To ascertain the effectiveness of this treatment, we performed a retrospective analysis on 206 rectal resections with primary anastomosis and routine use of a selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) regimen for local decontamination. SDD medication was administered every 8 h from the day before surgery to the seventh postoperative day. All patients were treated according to the fast-track protocol without mechanical bowel preparation; instead, a laxative was used. RESULTS: Overall morbidity was 30%, overall mortality 0.5%. In our data, overall rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 5.8%, with 3.9% in anterior rectal resection and 6.5% in low anterior rectal resection group. In 75% of cases, anastomotic leakage was grade "C" and needed re-laparotomy. Surgical site infection rate was 19.9%. No serious adverse events were related to decontamination. CONCLUSION: Local antibiotic decontamination appears to be safe and effective to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery. Further focus should be on perioperative management including bowel preparation and choice of antimicrobial agents for local decontamination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anastomotic leakage; Local decontamination; Oral antibiotics; Rectal surgery; SDD
Authors: Daphne Roos; Lea M Dijksman; Brigitte M Sondermeijer; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Laurens T de Wit; Michael F Gerhards Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: H M Schardey; U Joosten; U Finke; K H Staubach; R Schauer; A Heiss; A Kooistra; H G Rau; R Nibler; S Lüdeling; K Unertl; G Ruckdeschel; H Exner; F W Schildberg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrea D Olivas; Benjamin D Shogan; Vesta Valuckaite; Alexander Zaborin; Natalya Belogortseva; Mark Musch; Folker Meyer; William L Trimble; Gary An; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: H M Schardey; Ulrich Wirth; T Strauss; M S Kasparek; D Schneider; K W Jauch Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Josefine Schardey; Thomas von Ahnen; Emily Schardey; Alina Kappenberger; Petra Zimmermann; Florian Kühn; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner; Helmut Arbogast; Ulrich Wirth Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Josefine Schardey; Sophie Zehl; Alina S Kappenberger; Petra Zimmermann; Florian Beigel; Tobias S Schiergens; Michael S Kasparek; Florian Kühn; Jens Werner; Ulrich Wirth Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 2.796