| Literature DB >> 32098332 |
Alessandro Leone1, Alberto Battezzati1, Sara Di Lello2, Stefano Ravasenghi1, Babahmed Mohamed-Iahdih3, Saleh Mohamed Lamin Saleh4, Simona Bertoli1,5.
Abstract
Diabetes is one of the main health problems among Saharawi refugees living in Algerian camps, especially for women. As is known, diet plays an important role in the management of diabetes. However, the dietary habits of Saharawi diabetic women are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the dietary habits and established their relationship with the nutritional status and glycemic profile of such women. We recruited 65 Saharawi type II diabetic women taking orally glucose-lowering drugs only. Dietary habits were investigated using qualitative 24 h recall carried out over three non-consecutive days. Anthropometric measurements were taken and blood parameters were measured. About 80% of the women were overweight and about three out of four women had uncompensated diabetes and were insulin resistant. The Saharawi diet was found to mainly include cereals, oils, sugars, vegetables (especially onions, tomatoes, and carrots), tea, and meat. Principal component analysis identified two major dietary patterns, the first one "healthy" and the second one "unhealthy". Women in the higher tertile of adherence to the unhealthy dietary pattern had a higher homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA) index (b = 2.49; 95% CI: 0.41-4.57; p = 0.02) and circulating insulin (b = 4.52; 95% CI: 0.44-8.60; p = 0.03) than the women in the lowest tertile. Food policies should be oriented to improve the quality of diet of Saharawi diabetic women.Entities:
Keywords: HbA1c; Saharawi refugee camps; diabetes; dietary habits; dietary pattern; food consumption; glucose; insulin; nutritional status; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098332 PMCID: PMC7071476 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Sociodemographic characteristics of the recruited women.
|
| % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilaya (Province) | Daira (Town) | ||
| Smara | 44 | 67.7 | |
| Eydaria | 12 | 18.5 | |
| Bir Lehlu | 10 | 15.4 | |
| Mahbes | 11 | 16.9 | |
| Farsia | 11 | 16.9 | |
| Bojador | 21 | 32.3 | |
| 27Febrero | 10 | 15.4 | |
| Lamsid | 11 | 16.9 | |
| Education | |||
| None | 25 | 38.5 | |
| Primary level | 18 | 27.7 | |
| Secondary level | 20 | 30.8 | |
| University | 2 | 3.1 | |
| Marital status | |||
| Unmarried | 1 | 1.5 | |
| Married | 38 | 58.5 | |
| Divorced | 12 | 18.5 | |
| Widow | 14 | 21.5 | |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 29 | 44.6 | |
| Retired | 4 | 6.2 | |
| Worker | 32 | 49.2 |
Abbreviation: n = number of subjects for each category.
Nutritional and metabolic characteristics of the recruited women.
| P25 | P50 | P75 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutritional status | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6 | 28.7 | 31.8 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 97.0 | 101.8 | 108.5 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 95.8 | 101.0 | 108.5 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Arm circumference (cm) | 31.0 | 34.0 | 36.0 |
| Tricipital SKF (mm) | 30.0 | 34.0 | 41.0 |
| Bicipital SKF (mm) | 21.0 | 25.5 | 33.0 |
| Subscapular SKF (mm) | 32.5 | 36.0 | 41.0 |
| Suprailiac SKF (mm) | 32.0 | 36.5 | 41.0 |
| Body fat (%) | 43.7 | 45.4 | 47.3 |
| Metabolic parameters | |||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 163 | 207 | 243 |
| Insulin (mU/mL) | 4.9 | 8.8 | 13.9 |
| HOMA | 2.4 | 4.5 | 7.1 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.9 | 9.4 | 10.3 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 120 | 135 | 145 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 75 | 80 | 89 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 165 | 188 | 219 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 98 | 126 | 166 |
| AST (U/L) | 20 | 24 | 30 |
| ALT (U/L) | 17 | 21 | 26 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.7 | 14.0 | 14.6 |
Abbreviations: P25 = 25th percentile; P50 = 50th percentile; P75 = 75th percentile.
Figure 1Propensity of the Saharawi diabetic women to the consumption of the different food groups.
Figure 2Frequency of consumption of each food item within each food group category.
Score coefficients derived from principal component analysis regarding foods or food groups consumed by Saharawi diabetic women.
| Healthy Dietary Pattern | Unhealthy Dietary Pattern | |
|---|---|---|
| Grain cereals | −0.273 | 0.110 |
| Bread, pasta, rice, couscous | 0.095 |
|
| Potatoes | −0.040 | 0.006 |
| Fried potatoes | −0.043 | −0.076 |
| Onions, tomatoes, and carrots | 0.027 |
|
| Other vegetables |
| 0.101 |
| Olive oil |
| −0.220 |
| Sunflower oil | −0.191 |
|
| Animal fats |
| 0.290 |
| Fresh fruit |
| −0.156 |
| Dried fruit | 0.205 |
|
| Red meat |
|
|
| White meat |
| 0.247 |
| Eggs |
| −0.049 |
| Low-fat milk |
| −0.190 |
| Camel’s, cow’s, and goat’s milk and dairy products |
| 0.099 |
| Legumes |
| 0.232 |
| Canned fish | 0.264 | 0.108 |
| Fresh fish | −0.088 |
|
| Sugar, sweets, and beverages | −0.132 |
|
| Explained variance (%) | 15.3 | 14.3 |
Factor loadings characterizing each dietary pattern. Factor loadings with an absolute value ≥ 0.3 are reported in bold font.
Association of healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns with the nutritional status and the glycemic profile.
| Healthy Dietary Pattern | Unhealthy Dietary Pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |
| Nutritional status * | ||||||
| BMI | Reference | 0.76 | 1.62 | Reference | 0.66 | −0.65 |
| [−1.95, 3.47] | [−1.18, 4.43] | [−2.09, 3.40] | [−3.45, 2.15] | |||
| WC | Reference | −0.69 | 1.00 | Reference | 4.01 | −0.47 |
| [−6.66, 5.29] | [−5.17, 7.16] | [−1.94, 9.96] | [−6.50, 5.56] | |||
| WHR | Reference | 0.00 | 0.01 | Reference | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| [−0.06, 0.05] | [−0.05, 0.07] | [−0.02, 0.09] | [−0.04, 0.07] | |||
| BF% | Reference | 0.21 | −0.28 | Reference | 1.35 | 1.90 |
| [−1.76, 2.17] | [−2.35, 1.79] | [−0.61, 3.31] | [−0.12, 3.91] | |||
| Glycemic profile † | ||||||
| HbA1c (%) | Reference | 0.39 | −0.06 | Reference | −0.36 | 0.50 |
| [−0.65, 1.42] | [−1.12, 0.99] | [−1.38, 0.66] | [−0.55, 1.55] | |||
| HOMA | Reference | −0.05 | −0.49 | Reference | −0.03 | 2.49 * |
| [−2.22, 2.11] | [−2.74, 1.76] | [−2.06, 1.99] | [0.41, 4.57] | |||
| Insulin (mU/mL) | Reference | 0.00 | −0.90 | Reference | 0.89 | 4.52 * |
| [−4.18, 4.18] | [−5.24, 3.44] | [−3.08, 4.87] | [0.44, 8.60] | |||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | Reference | 1.71 | −6.93 | Reference | −17.86 | 6.58 |
| [−37.30, 40.73] | [−46.87, 33.02] | [−56.56, 20.84] | [−33.21, 46.36] | |||
Values are linear regression coefficient and 95% CI in brackets. * Model adjusted for age and years passed from the diagnosis of diabetes. † Model adjusted for age, years passed from the diagnosis of diabetes, and BMI.