Literature DB >> 3209488

Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation.

P J Abbas1, C J Brown.   

Abstract

The electrically evoked brainstem potential was measured in cochlear implant patients with Symbion multichannel electrode system. In the first experiment, electrodes within the implant were stimulated individually and the responses and sensitivity across electrodes and across subjects were evaluated. The typical response waveform consisted of a series of three peaks, the most prominent occurring at approximately 4 ms after stimulus onset. The amplitude of the largest peak typically showed an orderly increase with increasing current level while latency changes were relatively small. In the second experiment, two electrodes were stimulated simultaneously in order to evaluate the relative independence of the neural populations being stimulated by the different electrode pairs. The responses were compared when two electrode pairs were stimulated simultaneously with current pulses in phase and when the same electrodes were stimulated with current pulses inverted relative to each other. Both stimulation conditions showed similar growth in response amplitude with level but different sensitivity. The differences in sensitivity between these two conditions may be indicative of the degree of overlap in the stimulated neural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3209488     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90057-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Rohit U Verma; Amélie A Guex; Kenneth E Hancock; Nedim Durakovic; Colette M McKay; Michaël C C Slama; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  [Cochlear implant fitting strategies].

Authors:  U Hoppe; T Liebscher; J Hornung
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

7.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

9.  Examination and Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Results of Children with Cochlear Implantation without Inner Ear Anomaly.

Authors:  Seda Bayrak; Başak Mutlu; Günay Kırkım; Bülent Şerbetçioğlu
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Alejandro Lopez Valdes; Myles Mc Laughlin; Laura Viani; Peter Walshe; Jaclyn Smith; Fan-Gang Zeng; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.