| Literature DB >> 32094453 |
Shelby Spring1, Hasitha Premathilake1, Udaya DeSilva1, Cedrick Shili1, Scott Carter1, Adel Pezeshki2.
Abstract
Reducing dietary crude protein (CP) beyond a certain threshold leads to poor growth performance in pigs; however, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Following an adaption period, thirty-seven weaned pigs were weight matched (8.41 ± 0.14 kg), housed individually and randomly assigned into three groups with different dietary CP levels: 24% CP (CON; n = 12), 18% CP (n = 12) and 12% CP (n = 13) for 28 days. The body weight was not different between the CON and 18% CP diets, but 12% CP significantly decreased body weight after day 21. Compared to the CON, pigs fed with 12% CP decreased feed intake day 17 onwards. The 12% CP diet increased the energy expenditure during week 1 compared to the CON. The 12% CP influenced starch and sucrose, nitrogen, and branched-chain amino acids metabolism pathways. The feces of pigs fed with 12% CP were less enriched in Prevotella, but had higher relative abundance of Christensenedilaceae, Aligiphilus and Algoriphagus than CON and 18% CP. Overall, reducing dietary CP by 50%, but not by 25%, significantly influenced the physiological responses in nursery pigs. The pigs fed with low or standard protein diets had differential bacterial communities in their feces as well as serum metabolomics profile.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32094453 PMCID: PMC7040010 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60150-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The effect of low protein diets on energy balance. (A) feed intake, (B) body weight, (C) mean energy expenditure (EE), (D) mean respiratory quotient (RQ), (E) area under curve (AUC) for EE, (F) AUC for RQ. CON, control diet with 24% crude protein (CP); 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP. Among groups, values with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05). The values are means ± standard errors of means. n = 12, n = 12, n = 13 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively for feed intake and body weight data; n = 7, n = 7, n = 8 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively for EE and RQ data.
Effect of dietary protein content on growth measurements.
| Measurements | CON1 | 18% CP1 | 12% CP1 | SEM2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight, kg | 8.40 | 8.40 | 8.50 | 0.70 | 0.978 |
| Final body weight, kg | 21.02a | 18.97a | 13.04b | 1.95 | <0.001 |
| ADG3, g/d | 485.87a | 406.41a | 173.41b | 27.53 | <0.001 |
| ADFI3, g/d | 837.20a | 839.53a | 591.60b | 28.88 | 0.007 |
| G:F3, g/g | 0.58a | 0.48a | 0.29b | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| ADPI3, g/d | 191.88a | 164.71a | 67.44b | 0.15 | <0.001 |
| G:P3, g/g | 2.55 | 2.48 | 2.57 | 0.14 | 0.334 |
1CON, control diet with 24% crude protein (CP); 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP.
2SEM: standard errors of means.
3ADG: average daily gain; ADFI: average daily feed intake; G:F: gain:feed ratio; ADPI: average daily protein intake; G:P: gain:protein ratio.
a,bWithin a row, values with different superscripts are different (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Principle component analysis (PCA) score plots and the pathway analysis map of serum metabolites in piglets fed with low protein diets. (A) PCA score plots of serum metabolites. Each node represents an individual pig. (B) The map of pathway analysis for the metabolites detected in the blood serum. Each circle represents a metabolic pathway with the scores obtained from topology analysis (pathway impact; the x-axis) and the pathway enrichment analysis (y-axis). The color of each circle is based on its p-value, while the size of each circle is based on its impact values. Therefore, larger size circles are indicative of higher pathway impact, while darker colors circles are suggestive of more significant changes of metabolites and higher pathway enrichment. No difference in pathway enrichment was found between CON and 18% crude protein (CP) or between 18% CP and 12% CP. Therefore, the data for both CON and 18% CP were combined and compared with 12% CP for pathway enrichment. CON, control diet with 24% CP; 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP. n = 7, n = 7, n = 8 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively.
Effect of dietary protein content on blood metabolomics profile.
| Metabolites | CON1,2 | 18% CP1,2 | 12% CP1,2 | SEM3 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-hydroxyhippuric acid | 333.9a ± 55.7 | 335.0a ± 49.0 | 186.2b ± 35.3 | 18.2 | <0.001 |
| Indole-3-acetate | 1288.4a ± 523.3 | 949.3ab ± 257.9 | 776.2b ± 217.7 | 85.5 | 0.008 |
| Arabitol | 9536.1a ± 2895.9 | 12458.1a ± 2777.1 | 26265.7b ± 4795.0 | 1786.3 | <0.001 |
| Pinitol | 6066.4a ± 1439.3 | 5577.4a ± 1678.6 | 1711.4b ± 442.4 | 504.4 | <0.001 |
| Hexitol | 3156.6a ± 583.4 | 4568.1a ± 1257.4 | 6908.6b ± 1165.3 | 403.6 | <0.001 |
| Xylitol | 4949.9a ± 446.6 | 4736.9a ± 890.5 | 3712.0b ± 458.1 | 174.7 | <0.001 |
| Lactobionic Acid | 2661.0a ± 834.8 | 2188.4ab ± 875.6 | 1246.9b ± 611.8 | 204.1 | <0.001 |
| Conduritol-beta-epoxide | 15246.9a ± 6484.8 | 17466.1a ± 8838.6 | 4229.9b ± 1388.0 | 1802.1 | <0.001 |
| N-acetylmannosamine | 325.9a ± 161.6 | 561.4ab ± 220.9 | 756.9b ± 165.7 | 53.8 | 0.001 |
| Saccharic acid | 2087.3a ± 719.1 | 2438.6a ± 732.9 | 1391.9b ± 288.8 | 155.7 | 0.002 |
| UDP-glucuronic acid | 593.6a ± 152.8 | 485.6a ± 91.4 | 309.7b ± 108.2 | 35.5 | <0.001 |
| 2-hydroxyglutaric acid | 1026.1a ± 300.2 | 1375.6a ± 479.5 | 1910.5b ± 380.4 | 113.2 | 0.001 |
| Aconitic acid | 1414.9a ± 362.3 | 1233.7ab ± 225.9 | 1024.9b ± 231.5 | 66.5 | 0.002 |
| Glucose-1-phosphate | 1139.6a ± 278.4 | 1368.1ab ± 229.3 | 1719.6b ± 273.8 | 74.9 | 0.008 |
| Glucose | 60566.9a ± 7699.4 | 109757.0b ± 42503.7 | 147801.5c ± 32350.6 | 10082.5 | <0.001 |
| Hydroxycarbamate | 3102.6a ± 1508.9 | 6206.6a ± 2725.3 | 10706.1b ± 2107.4 | 818.4 | <0.001 |
| N-acetylglutamate | 221.1a ± 90.1 | 223.7a ± 94.3 | 381.6b ± 74.7 | 24.2 | 0.003 |
| Orotic acid | 297.7a ± 59.5 | 252.4b ± 49.3 | 238.7b ± 52.3 | 12.2 | 0.007 |
| Isoleucine | 311769.7a ± 28746.2 | 292147.1a ± 57318.2 | 189372.3b ± 32707.5 | 14567.1 | <0.001 |
| Tryptophan | 94968.1a ± 31926.0 | 85616.6a ± 26084.5 | 47116.6b ± 8808.5 | 6667.3 | <0.001 |
| Oxoproline | 818178.6a ± 55568.7 | 712547.7b ± 92182.9 | 643733.8b ± 81095.4 | 22308.1 | <0.001 |
| Glutamic acid | 43575.4a ± 17906.9 | 62658.3a ± 30741.2 | 103193.4b ± 31564.9 | 7869.2 | 0.002 |
| Glycine | 670979.7a ± 77092.1 | 622914.1a ± 180096.8 | 414781.3b ± 104649.7 | 35718.3 | 0.002 |
| Valine | 411978.9a ± 49889.2 | 381391.3ab ± 74580.3 | 294508.4b ± 35679.9 | 15683.7 | 0.004 |
| Tyrosine | 341122.9a ± 100236.5 | 311482.7ab ± 43414.8 | 226762.3b ± 39620.8 | 17163.5 | 0.004 |
| Isohexonic acid | 2325.6a ± 275.0 | 2302.3a ± 688.3 | 1412.5b ± 338.3 | 133.5 | <0.001 |
| 2-ketoisocaproic acid | 17449.9a ± 2218.4 | 14123.1b ± 3060.5 | 11027.1b ± 1627.7 | 747.8 | <0.001 |
| Aminomalonate | 2319.7a ± 1180.8 | 7096.4b ± 3853.0 | 9997.9b ± 3377.5 | 930.0 | <0.001 |
| Phenylethylamine | 7534.6a ± 4235.9 | 7324.0a ± 2537.3 | 15673.0b ± 3443.1 | 1116.0 | <0.001 |
| Putrescine | 991.3a ± 189.7 | 1671.3b ± 395.3 | 2035.4b ± 554.4 | 127.0 | 0.001 |
| Trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline | 116148.9a ± 18749.9 | 92179.4b ± 16517.4 | 46283.7c ± 21204.3 | 7496.0 | <0.001 |
| Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid | 2869.1a ± 384.5 | 2591.3ab ± 651.9 | 2025.7b ± 323.9 | 122.8 | 0.003 |
| N-acetylaspartic acid | 1388.3a ± 461.0 | 1300.1a ± 673.8 | 718.9b ± 156.6 | 115.7 | 0.003 |
| Dehydroascorbic acid | 1446.7a ± 430.3 | 2488.0b ± 786.9 | 1334.2b ± 477.9 | 162.9 | 0.002 |
| Cholesterol | 275695.1a ± 28637.7 | 305711.7a ± 76128.6 | 396785.3b ± 43574.5 | 15668.9 | 0.002 |
1CON, control diet with 24% crude protein (CP); 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP.
2Average peak height.
3SEM: standard errors of means.
a,bWithin a row, values with different superscripts are different (P < 0.05). The values are the mean ± standard errors.
Figure 3Beta diversity of the fecal bacterial community in nursery pigs fed with different levels of dietary protein at genus level. Principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) of fecal microbiota for (A) CON vs. 18% crude protein (CP), (B) CON vs. 12% CP, (C) 12% CP vs. 18% CP, (D) 12% CP vs. 18% CP vs. CON. Pigs are grouped based on their dietary treatments, i.e. CON, control diet with 24% CP; 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP. Each node represents an individual pig. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. The PERMANOVA P values for CON vs. 18% CP, CON vs. 12% CP, 12% CP vs. 18% CP and 12% CP vs. 18% CP vs. CON were 0.38, 0.07, 0.02 and 0.04, respectively. n = 7, n = 7, n = 8 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively.
Figure 4The effect of low protein diets on fecal bacterial community at phylum and genus level. (A) The relative abundance of bacterial community composition at phylum level in fecal samples of pigs fed with different levels of dietary protein. Only the top 20 phyla are depicted for clarity. (B) The relative abundance of bacterial community composition at genus level in fecal samples of pigs fed with different levels of dietary protein. Only the top 10 genera are depicted for clarity. CON, control diet with 24% crude protein (CP); 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP. n = 7, n = 7, n = 8 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively.
Figure 5Effect of low protein diets on fecal microbiota composition at genus level using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with effect size (LEfSe). (A) CON vs. 18% crude protein (CP), (B) CON vs. 12% CP, (C) 12% CP vs. 18% CP. CON, control diet with 24% CP; 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP. n = 7, n = 7, n = 8 for CON, 18% CP and 12% CP groups, respectively.
Composition of experimental diets (as-fed basis).
| Ingredients, % | CON1 | 18% CP1 | 12% CP1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn, yellow dent | 52.60 | 64.63 | 76.09 |
| Fish meal, menhaden | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Soybean meal, 47.5% CP | 34.50 | 18.52 | 3.94 |
| Whey, dried | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Corn starch | — | 3.65 | 6.29 |
| Dicalcium phosphate 18.5% | 0.65 | 1.06 | 1.44 |
| Limestone | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.55 |
| Salt | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Vitamin premix2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Trace mineral premix3 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Crude protein, % | |||
| Calculated4 | 24.00 | 18.00 | 12.00 |
| Analyzed | 23.00 | 19.00 | 12.00 |
| SID Lysine, %4 | 1.32 | 0.91 | 0.54 |
| SID Threonine, %4 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| SID Methionine, %4 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.23 |
| SID Tryptophan, %4 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.1 |
| Crude Fat, % | |||
| Calculated4 | 3.61 | 3.60 | 3.61 |
| Analyzed | 3.10 | 2.70 | 3.20 |
| Carbohydrate, % | 70.49 | 76.19 | 81.73 |
| ME, Mcal/kg5 | |||
| Calculated4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
1CON, control diet with 24% crude protein (CP); 18% CP, low protein diet with 18% CP; 12% CP, low protein diet with 12% CP.
2Vitamin mix provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 720,000 IU; vitamin D, 180,000 IU; vitamin E, 5,400 mg; vitamin K3, 360 mg; vitamin B12, 3.15 mg; niacin, 6,750 mg; pantothenic acid, 2,250 mg; riboflavin, 675 mg; phytase, 61,200 FTU.
3Mineral mix provided per kilogram of diet: copper sulfate, 11,000 ppm; iodine, 198 ppm; iron, 73,413 ppm; manganese, 22,046; selenium, 198 ppm; zinc, 73,413 ppm.
4Values were calculated using National Swine Nutrition Guide (NSNG; V 2.0) software; standard ileal digestibility (SID).
5Metabolizable energy (ME).