Literature DB >> 32093538

Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Stephanie Wendt1, Nico Kleinhoelting1,2, Tomer J Czaczkes1.   

Abstract

In order to make effective collective decisions, ants lay pheromone trails to lead nest-mates to acceptable food sources. The strength of a trail informs other ants about the quality of a food source, allowing colonies to exploit the most profitable resources. However, recruiting too many ants to a single food source can lead to over-exploitation, queuing, and thus decreased food intake for the colony. The nonlinear nature of pheromonal recruitment can also lead colonies to become trapped in suboptimal decisions, if the environment changes. Negative feedback systems can ameliorate these problems. We investigated a potential source of negative feedback: whether the presence of nest-mates makes food sources more or less attractive. Lasius niger workers were trained to food sources of identical quality, scented with different odours. Ants fed alone at one odour. At the other odour ants fed either with other feeding nest-mates, or with dummy ants (black surface lipid-coated glass beads). Ants tended to avoid food sources at which other nest-mates were present. They also deposited less pheromone to occupied food sources, suggesting an active avoidance behaviour, and potentiating negative feedback. This effect may prevent crowding at a single food source when other profitable food sources are available elsewhere, leading to a higher collective food intake. It could also potentially protect colonies from becoming trapped in local feeding optima. However, ants did not avoid the food associated with dummy ants, suggesting that surface lipids and static visual cues alone may not be sufficient for nest-mate recognition in this context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ants; crowding; food choice; foraging behaviour; negative feedback; pheromone deposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32093538      PMCID: PMC7061701          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  45 in total

1.  Foraging in the ant Camponotus mus: nectar-intake rate and crop filling depend on colony starvation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  Olfactory conditioning during the recruitment process in a leaf-cutting ant.

Authors:  F Roces
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Primacy and recency effects in extinction and latent inhibition: a selective review with implications for models of learning.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Private information conflict: Lasius niger ants prefer olfactory cues to route memory.

Authors:  F B Oberhauser; A Schlemm; S Wendt; T J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Social network plasticity decreases disease transmission in a eusocial insect.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Anna V Grasse; Alessandro Crespi; Danielle P Mersch; Sylvia Cremer; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Right-sided population bias and lateralization of activity in normal rats.

Authors:  S D Glick; D A Ross
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-01-26       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Ant nestmate and non-nestmate discrimination by a chemosensory sensillum.

Authors:  Mamiko Ozaki; Ayako Wada-Katsumata; Kazuyo Fujikawa; Masayuki Iwasaki; Fumio Yokohari; Yuji Satoji; Tomoyosi Nisimura; Ryohei Yamaoka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neuronal control of locomotor handedness in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sean M Buchanan; Jamey S Kain; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modeling shortest path selection of the ant Linepithema humile using psychophysical theory and realistic parameter values.

Authors:  Wolfhard von Thienen; Dirk Metzler; Volker Witte
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Brain and behavioral lateralization in invertebrates.

Authors:  Elisa Frasnelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Negative feedback may suppress variation to improve collective foraging performance.

Authors:  Andreagiovanni Reina; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Foraging through multiple nest holes: An impediment to collective decision-making in ants.

Authors:  Marine Lehue; Claire Detrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ant Lasius niger joining one-way trails go against the flow.

Authors:  Yuta Sakamoto; Tomoko Sakiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.