Literature DB >> 15845309

Primacy and recency effects in extinction and latent inhibition: a selective review with implications for models of learning.

Oskar Pineño1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

In the framework of animal conditioning and human associative learning, primacy and recency effects on acquired stimulus control of behavior refer to the superior influence of first-learned and last-learned associations, respectively. Most contemporary associative models of learning anticipate unwavering recency effects and claim support from numerous published studies. But, for pragmatic reasons, almost all of these studies were conducted under select conditions that favored recency effects. When these conditions are not met, recency effects are far from ubiquitous. We review the literature on primacy and recency effects regarding extinction and latent inhibition (i.e., interference between outcomes), with special emphasis on the impact of certain post-training manipulations and test conditions on conditioned responding. Evidence for recency-to-primacy shifts and for memory integration is examined in light of contemporary models of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845309     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Recency and primacy in causal judgments: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction.

Authors:  Steven Glautier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

3.  Conditioned effects of heroin on the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the rat are susceptible to extinction and latent inhibition.

Authors:  Jennifer L Szczytkowski; Donald T Lysle
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Temporal integration in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Kosuke Sawa; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  First is best.

Authors:  Dana R Carney; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Conditioned avoidance responses survive contingency degradation in the garden slug, Lehmannia valentiana.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Elizabeth P Dunaway; Kyle H Gennaro
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.926

Review 8.  Human latent inhibition: Problems with the stimulus exposure effect.

Authors:  N C Byrom; R M Msetfi; R A Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.