| Literature DB >> 32093086 |
Jia Qi1,2, Wenbo Li1,2,3, Wei Chu4, Jianping Yu1,2,5, Miao Wu4, Youting Liang4, Difeng Yin1,2, Peng Wang1,2,5, Zhenhua Wang4, Min Wang4, Ya Cheng1,4,6,7.
Abstract
We demonstrate a microfluidic mixer of high mixing efficiency in fused silica substrate using femtosecond laser-induced wet etching and hydroxide-catalysis bonding method. The micromixer has a three-dimensional geometry, enabling efficient mixing based on Baker's transformation principle. The cross-sectional area of the fabricated micromixer was 0.5 × 0.5 mm2, enabling significantly promotion of the throughput of the micromixer. The performance of the fabricated micromixers was evaluated by mixing up blue and yellow ink solutions with a flow rate as high as 6 mL/min.Entities:
Keywords: glass bonding; microfluidic; ultrafast laser microfabrication
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093086 PMCID: PMC7074671 DOI: 10.3390/mi11020213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Comparison of three different types of micromixer devices designed and fabricated basing on the Baker’s transformation.
| Channel Width × Height | Maximum Flow Rate | Materials | Processing Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 µm × 20 µm | ~200 µL/min | PDMS | PDMS molds | [ |
| 50 µm × 75 µm | ~20 µL/min | Porous glass | Femtosecond laser direct writing and annealing | [ |
| 500 µm × 500 µm | 6 mL/min | Fused silica | FLISE and bonding | This work |
Figure 1(a) Schematic view of working mechanism of the micromixer. The two microfluidic streams sent into the mixing unit are divided into four sub-streams alternatively spaced with each other at the middle of the unit and further divided into eight streams at the exit; (b) Schematic of the 3D micromixer constructed by bonding two substrates with microfluidic channels fabricated by femtosecond laser micromachining on the top surfaces.
Figure 2Numerical simulations of mixing performances at a flow rate of 2 mL/min in (a) a T-shape straight microchannel with a rectangular cross section and (b) a 3D micromixer consisting of six mixing units. The straight microchannel and the 3D micromixer have the same total length and the same cross section area. Scale bar in (a,b): 0.5 mm.
Figure 3Fabrication procedures: (a) ultrafast laser direct writing; (b) chemical wet etching; and (c) hydroxide-catalysis bonding.
Figure 4Top view optical micrograph of (a) fabricated micromixers; (b) the detailed features of mixing unit; (c) the microchannel on half glass substrate before bonding. (d,e) are the 3D images of (c) from different view angles captured by laser confocal microscopy. Inset: Image of the cross section at the end of the mixing unit after bonding.
Figure 5Microscope images of the mixing behaviors of the blue and yellow ink solutions in straight channel at a flow rate of (a) 1 mL/min, (c) 2 mL/min and (e) 6 mL/min, and in fabricated 3D micromixer at a flow rate of (b) 1 mL/min, (d) 2 mL/min and (f) 6 mL/min. Scale bar in (a–f): 0.5 mm.