Literature DB >> 26854878

3D-Printed Microfluidics.

Anthony K Au1, Wilson Huynh2, Lisa F Horowitz2, Albert Folch2.   

Abstract

The advent of soft lithography allowed for an unprecedented expansion in the field of microfluidics. However, the vast majority of PDMS microfluidic devices are still made with extensive manual labor, are tethered to bulky control systems, and have cumbersome user interfaces, which all render commercialization difficult. On the other hand, 3D printing has begun to embrace the range of sizes and materials that appeal to the developers of microfluidic devices. Prior to fabrication, a design is digitally built as a detailed 3D CAD file. The design can be assembled in modules by remotely collaborating teams, and its mechanical and fluidic behavior can be simulated using finite-element modeling. As structures are created by adding materials without the need for etching or dissolution, processing is environmentally friendly and economically efficient. We predict that in the next few years, 3D printing will replace most PDMS and plastic molding techniques in academia.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; cytotoxicity; microfluidics; photochemistry; polymerization

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854878     DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


  103 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Lab-on-a-chip based mechanical actuators and sensors for single-cell and organoid culture studies.

Authors:  Jaan Männik; Tetsuhiko F Teshima; Bernhard Wolfrum; Da Yang
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  An easily fabricated three-dimensional threaded lemniscate-shaped micromixer for a wide range of flow rates.

Authors:  Mehdi Rafeie; Marcel Welleweerd; Amin Hassanzadeh-Barforoushi; Mohsen Asadnia; Wouter Olthuis; Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Open-source, community-driven microfluidics with Metafluidics.

Authors:  David S Kong; Todd A Thorsen; Jonathan Babb; Scott T Wick; Jeremy J Gam; Ron Weiss; Peter A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  3D printed auto-mixing chip enables rapid smartphone diagnosis of anemia.

Authors:  Kimberly Plevniak; Matthew Campbell; Timothy Myers; Abby Hodges; Mei He
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  3D-Printing of Functional Biomedical Microdevices via Light- and Extrusion-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Henry H Hwang; Wei Zhu; Grace Victorine; Natalie Lawrence; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Rapid mask prototyping for microfluidics.

Authors:  B G C Maisonneuve; T Honegger; J Cordeiro; O Lecarme; T Thiry; D Fuard; K Berton; E Picard; M Zelsmann; D Peyrade
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

10.  FDM 3D Printing of High-Pressure, Heat-Resistant, Transparent Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Valentin Romanov; Raheel Samuel; Marzieh Chaharlang; Alexander R Jafek; Adam Frost; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.