Sarah J Miano1,2, Sara L Douglas1, Ronald L Hickman1, Marguerite DiMarco1, Connie Piccone2, Barbara J Daly1. 1. Case Western Reserve University Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 2. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Angie Fowler's Adolescent & Young Adult Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer encounter many medical treatment decisions but may have variable desires for involvement in decision-making. This study describes the degree of decisional control AYA patients preferred in complex medical decisions. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design evaluated experienced AYA patients' decision-making role preferences using the Control Preference Scale and explored relationships in a proposed model of decision control. Results: Overall, most patients preferred an "active collaborative" role (39%), where the patient prefers to make the final decision with input from the provider, or a "shared decision-making" role (34%), wherein the decision is jointly made between patient and provider. Oncology AYA patients tended to prefer a more passive role than nononcology AYA patients. Time since diagnosis also positively correlated with control preference, with patients preferring a more active level of decisional control as the number of days from diagnosis increased. While no other statistically significant relationships were found between factors put forth in the exploratory model and decision control, there were strong associations between the factors themselves that warrant future study. Conclusion: The findings advance the knowledge of AYA preferences for decision-making involvement, enhancing our ability to identify patients at risk for low health care engagement and explore the consequences of limited or impaired decisional capacity. Future research might examine interventions to promote self-management skills and patient decisional role preferences, fulfilling the need to respect both the desire for decision-making involvement of some patients and the preference to defer to the expertise of providers for others.
Purpose: Adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer encounter many medical treatment decisions but may have variable desires for involvement in decision-making. This study describes the degree of decisional control AYA patients preferred in complex medical decisions. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design evaluated experienced AYA patients' decision-making role preferences using the Control Preference Scale and explored relationships in a proposed model of decision control. Results: Overall, most patients preferred an "active collaborative" role (39%), where the patient prefers to make the final decision with input from the provider, or a "shared decision-making" role (34%), wherein the decision is jointly made between patient and provider. Oncology AYA patients tended to prefer a more passive role than nononcology AYA patients. Time since diagnosis also positively correlated with control preference, with patients preferring a more active level of decisional control as the number of days from diagnosis increased. While no other statistically significant relationships were found between factors put forth in the exploratory model and decision control, there were strong associations between the factors themselves that warrant future study. Conclusion: The findings advance the knowledge of AYA preferences for decision-making involvement, enhancing our ability to identify patients at risk for low health care engagement and explore the consequences of limited or impaired decisional capacity. Future research might examine interventions to promote self-management skills and patient decisional role preferences, fulfilling the need to respect both the desire for decision-making involvement of some patients and the preference to defer to the expertise of providers for others.
Entities:
Keywords:
adolescent; decision-making; oncology; self-efficacy; young adult
Authors: Kirk D Wyatt; Betsy List; William B Brinkman; Gabriela Prutsky Lopez; Noor Asi; Patricia Erwin; Zhen Wang; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Victor M Montori; Annie LeBlanc Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Dean Shumway; Kent A Griffith; Reshma Jagsi; Sheryl G Gabram; Geoffrey C Williams; Ken Resnicow Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.796