| Literature DB >> 32085561 |
Munhyung Bae1, Joon Soo An1, Seong-Heon Hong1, Eun Seo Bae1, Beomkoo Chung2, Yun Kwon1, Suckchang Hong3, Ki-Bong Oh2, Jongheon Shin1, Sang Kook Lee1, Dong-Chan Oh1.
Abstract
Chemical profiling of the Streptomyces sp. strain SUD119, which was isolated from a marine sediment sample collected from a volcanic island in Korea, led to the discovery of three new metabolites: donghaecyclinones A-C (1-3). The structures of 1-3 were found to be rearranged, multicyclic, angucyclinone-class compounds according to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) analyses. The configurations of their stereogenic centers were successfully assigned using a combination of quantum mechanics-based computational methods for calculating the NMR shielding tensor (DP4 and CP3) as well as electronic circular dichroism (ECD) along with a modified version of Mosher's method. Donghaecyclinones A-C (1-3) displayed cytotoxicity against diverse human cancer cell lines (IC50: 6.7-9.6 μM for 3).Entities:
Keywords: Streptomyces; angucyclinone; cytotoxicity; electronic circular dichroism; molecular modeling; quantum mechanics-based computation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32085561 PMCID: PMC7073551 DOI: 10.3390/md18020121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1The structures of donghaecyclinones A–C (1–3).
1H and 13C NMR data for 1–3.
| 1 a | 2 b | 3 b | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/H | δH c | mult ( | δC c | C/H | δH c | mult ( | δC c | δH c | mult ( | δC c |
|
| 198.9, s |
| 201.2, s | 200.4, s | ||||||
|
| 2.81 | dd (16.0, 4.5), 1H | 44.3, t |
| 2.81 | dd (15.0, 4.5), 1H | 46.8, t | 2.99 | dd (15.0, 4.5), 1H | 45.6, t |
|
| 2.32 | dd (16.0, 12.0), 1H |
| 2.64 | dd (15.0, 10.0), 1H | 2.38 | dd (15.0, 10.0), 1H | |||
|
| 2.08 | m, 1H | 37.0, d |
| 2.29 | m, 1H | 39.6, d | 2.24 | m, 1H | 38.2, d |
|
| 1.04 | d (6.5), 3H | 17.6, q |
| 1.20 | d (6.5), 3H | 18.9, q | 1.18 | d (6.5), 3H | 18.0, q |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| 4.22 | dd (7.5, 6.0), 1H | 71.4, d |
| 4.55 | d (6.5), 1H | 74.4, d | 4.43 | d (6.5), 1H | 73.4, d |
|
| 5.61 | d (6.0), 1H |
| 4.69 | brs, 1H | 4.74 | brs, 1H | |||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| 140.4, s |
| 139.9, s | 140.1, s | ||||||
|
| 7.49 | d (8.5), 1H | 127.6, d |
| 7.59 | d (8.5), 1H | 130.5, d | 7.63 | d (8.5), 1H | 129.4, d |
|
| 7.00 | d (8.5), 1H | 122.2, d |
| 7.03 | d (8.5), 1H | 122.0, d | 7.05 | d (8.5), 1H | 121.9, d |
|
| 148.5, s |
| 157.5, s | 157.3, s | ||||||
|
| 6.86 | s, 1H | 98.7, d |
| 8.83 | brs, 1H | 8.80 | brs, 1H | ||
|
| 122.8, s |
| ||||||||
|
| 153.6, s |
| 122.9, s | 122.8, s | ||||||
|
| 133.9, s | 132.7, s | ||||||||
|
| 3.85 | s, 3H | 55.6, q |
| 169.3, s | 169.3, s | ||||
|
|
| 7.43 | s, 1H | 76.4, d | 7.41 | s, 1H | 76.5, d | |||
|
| 6.94 | t (8.5), 1H | 111.5, d |
| 153.9, s | 153.8, s | ||||
|
| 7.27 | t (8.5), 1H | 131.5, d |
| 6.92 | d (8.5), 1H | 115.1, d | 6.93 | d (8.5), 1H | 115.0, d |
|
| 7.10 | d (8.5), 1H | 111.7, d |
| 7.54 | t (8.5), 1H | 136.2, d | 7.54 | t (8.5), 1H | 136.1, d |
|
| 148.3, s |
| 7.04 | d (8.5), 1H | 111.3, d | 7.04 | d (8.5), 1H | 111.2, d | ||
|
| 6.68 | s, 1H | 77.3, d |
| 158.9, s | 158.8, s | ||||
|
| 125.9, s |
| 116.0, s | 115.8, s | ||||||
|
| 126.3, s |
| 3.93 | s, 3H | 56.1, q | 3.94 | s, 3H | 56.0, q | ||
|
| ||||||||||
a DMSO-d6, b acetone-d6, c 1H, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 600 and 150 MHz, respectively.
Figure 2Determination of the planar structures of donghaecyclinones A–C (1–3) based on the analysis of key COSY and HMBC correlations.
Figure 3Key ROESY correlations of donghaecyclinone A (1).
Figure 4Determination of the absolute configuration of donghaecyclinone A (1). (a) Δδ values of the MTPA esters (1a and 1b) in DMSO-d6. (b) the simulated DP4 models of the two possible diastereomers 1c/1d (3R, 4S, 7S, and 12S/3R, 4S, 7R, and 12R) of 1.
Figure 5Determination of the relative and absolute configurations of donghaecyclinones B and C (2 and 3). (a) The simulated CP3 models of two possible diastereomer sets 2a/3a (3R*, 4S*, and 3′S*/3R*, 4S*, and 3′R*) and 2b/3b (3R*, 4S*, and 3′R*/3R*, 4S*, and 3′S*) on 2 and 3. (b) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 2, 2c, and 2d. (c) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 3, 3c, and 3d.
Figure 6Proposed biosynthetic pathway of donghaecyclinones A–C (1–3).
The cytotoxicity assay for donghaecyclinones A–C (1–3).
| Cytotoxicity (IC50 μM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT116 | MDA-MB231 | SNU638 | A549 | SK-HEP1 | |
|
| 28.9 | 20.0 | 16.1 | 22.9 | 14.2 |
|
| 27.3 | 19.3 | 19.6 | 19.0 | 9.6 |
|
| 8.0 | 6.7 | 9.5 | 9.6 | 6.0 |
| Etoposide | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 |