| Literature DB >> 32082391 |
Yunbo Gao1, Jingyun Li1,2, Yuan Zhang1,2,3, Luo Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is believed to be a complex genetic disease. The last decade has been marked by the publication of more than 20 genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of AR and associated allergic phenotypes and allergic diseases, which have shown allergic diseases and traits to share a large number of genetic susceptibility loci. The aim of present study was therefore to investigate the highly replicated allergy related genes and variants as candidates for AR in Han Chinese subjects.Entities:
Keywords: Allergic rhinitis; Replication; Single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082391 PMCID: PMC7014941 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-020-0411-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol ISSN: 1710-1484 Impact factor: 3.406
Demographic characteristics of study population
| Demographic Index | Allergic rhinitis (n = 762) | Control (n = 760) |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Mean (Range) (years) | 35.6 ± 12.7 (18–73) | 37.4 ± 13.3 (18–78) |
| Sex, Male/Female, No. (%) | 393 (51.6)/369 (48.4) | 378 (49.7)/382 (50.3) |
| Duration(IQR) (months) | 48.0(18.0–96.0) | – |
| Total IgE, Median (interquartile range) (kU/l) | 125.0(61.95–277.0) | 29.2(15.9–45.5) |
| Allergen category, no. (%) | ||
| House dust mites | 273 (35.8) | – |
| Seasonal pollens | 168 (22.0) | – |
| Mixed allergens | 321 (42.2) | – |
Genotype frequencies of cases and controls and their associations with AR risk under co-dominant genetic model
| Gene | SNP ID | Genotype | Case | Control | Logistic Regression | Armitage’s trend test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Frequency (%) | No. | Frequency (%) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| LPP | rs9865818 | AA | 325 | 42.71 | 361 | 47.50 | 0.052 | 1.000 (referent) | ||
| GA | 335 | 44.02 | 324 | 42.63 | 1.127 (0.903–1.407) | 0.29 | ||||
| GG | 101 | 13.27 | 75 | 9.87 | ||||||
| DNAH5 | rs6554809 | CC | 541 | 71.18 | 593 | 78.03 | 1.000 (referent) | |||
| TC | 206 | 27.11 | 153 | 20.13 | ||||||
| TT | 13 | 1.71 | 14 | 1.84 | 1.235 (0.558–2.732) | 0.603 | ||||
| WDR36-CAMK4 | rs1438673 | TT | 221 | 29.31 | 250 | 33.03 | 1.000 (referent) | |||
| TC | 382 | 50.66 | 393 | 51.92 | 1.045 (0.824–1.324) | 0.718 | ||||
| CC | 151 | 20.03 | 114 | 15.06 | ||||||
| HLA-DQB1-HLA-DQB2 | rs7775228 | TT | 422 | 55.60 | 493 | 64.95 | 1.000 (referent) | |||
| TC | 275 | 36.23 | 216 | 28.46 | ||||||
| CC | 62 | 8.17 | 50 | 6.59 | 1.500 (0.996–2.259) | 0.052 | ||||
| CLEC16A | rs7203459 | TT | 633 | 83.07 | 604 | 79.58 | 0.177 | 1.000 (referent) | 0.123 | |
| TC | 120 | 15.75 | 147 | 19.37 | ||||||
| CC | 9 | 1.18 | 8 | 1.05 | 0.962 (0.355–2.603) | 0.939 | ||||
Italic values indicate significance of P value (P < 0.05)
aGlobal P values [2 degrees of freedom (df)]: genotype frequencies in AR and control group were compared using a χ2 test with 2 df
bP values from unconditional logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and gender
Association analysis of SNPs under dominant and recessive genetic model
| Gene | SNP ID | Dominant model | Recessive model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic model | OR (95% CI) | Genetic model | OR (95% CI) | ||||
| TMEM108 | rs7617456 | (GA + AA) vs.GG | 0.980 (0.794–1.209) | 0.849 | AA vs.(GG + GA) | ||
| DNAH5 | rs6554809 | (TC + TT) vs.CC | TT vs.(CC + TC) | 1.098 (0.498-2.420) | 0.817 | ||
| WDR36-CAMK4 | rs1438673 | (TC + CC) vs.TT | 1.124 (0.897–1.409) | 0.308 | CC vs.(TT + TC) | ||
| HLA-DQB1-HLA-DQB2 | rs7775228 | (TC + CC) vs.TT | CC vs.(TT + TC) | 1.276 (0.855–1.906) | 0.233 | ||
| CLEC16A | rs7203459 | (TC + CC) vs.TT | CC vs.(TT + TC) | 1.017 (0.377–2.748) | 0.973 | ||
Italic values indicate significance of P value (P < 0.05)
aP values from unconditional logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and gender
Functional annotation of positive SNPs in HaploReg v4.1 tool
| SNP | Frequence in 1000 Genomes | Association phenotype with GWAS | eQTL | Histone markers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFR | AMR | ASN | EUR | ||||
| rs9865818 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.42 | Allergic sensitization [ | NA | H3K4me1_Enh H3K27ac_Enh |
| rs7617456 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.24 | 0.40 | IgE grass sensitization [ | NA | H3K4me3_Pro |
| rs6554809 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.16 | IgE grass sensitization [ | NA | H3K4me1_Enh |
| rs1438673 | 0.84 | 0.6 | 0.54 | 0.52 | Asthma and hay fever [ Self-reported allergy [ | TSLP | H3K4me1_Enh |
| rs7775228 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 0.28 | 0.15 | Asthma [ IgE grass sensitization [ | HLA-DPA1/HLA-DPA2/HLA-DQB1/HLA-DQB2 | H3K4me1_Enh |
| rs7203459 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.26 | Self-reported allergy [ | LOC642755, C16orf75/SOCS1 | H3K4me1_Enh H3K27ac_Enh |
AFR African, AMR Amerindian, ASN Asian, EUR European, eQTL Expression quantitative trait loci, NA not available because of the lack of data
Fig. 1The association between genotypes and serum total IgE under recessive model, dominant model and co-dominant model analysis. a rs7775228 in HLA-DQB1-HLA-DQB2. b rs1438673 in WDR36-CAMK4. The level of serum IgE was described in median with interquartile range and Y axis was changed in logarithmic scale (lg = log10)