Literature DB >> 32079001

Ionization quenching correction for a 3D scintillator detector exposed to scanning proton beams.

Fahed Alsanea1, Chinmay Darne, Daniel Robertson, Sam Beddar.   

Abstract

The ionization quenching phenomenon in scintillators must be corrected to obtain accurate dosimetry in particle therapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for correcting camera projection measurements of a 3D scintillator detector exposed to proton pencil beams. Birks' ionization quenching model and the energy deposition by secondary electrons (EDSE) model were used to correct the light captured by a prototype 3D scintillator detector. The detector was made of a 20 cm × 20 cm × 20 cm tank filled with liquid scintillator, and three cameras. The detector was exposed to four proton-beam energies (84.6, 100.9, 144.9, and 161.6 MeV) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's Proton Therapy Center. The dose and track averaged linear energy transfer (LET) were obtained using validated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The corrected light output was compared to the dose calculated by the MC simulation. Optical artefact corrections were used to correct for refraction at the air-scintillator interface, and image perspective. These corrections did not account for the non-orthogonal integration of data off the central axis of the image. Therefore, we compared the light output to an integrated MC dose and LET along the non-orthogonal path. After accounting for the non-orthogonal integration of the data, the corrected light output reduced the dose error at the Bragg peak region from 15% to 3% for low proton-beam energies. Overall, the doses at the Bragg peak region using the Birks' model and EDSE model were less than ±3% and ±7% of the MC dose, respectively. We have improved the application of Birks' model quenching corrections in 3D scintillators by numerically projecting the dose and LET 3D grid to camera projections. This study shows that scintillator projections can be corrected using average LET values at the central axes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32079001      PMCID: PMC7682349          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Verification of proton range, position, and intensity in IMPT with a 3D liquid scintillator detector system.

Authors:  L Archambault; F Poenisch; N Sahoo; D Robertson; A Lee; M T Gillin; R Mohan; S Beddar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Dragan Mirkovic; Luis A Perles; Narayan Sahoo; X Ron Zhu; George Ciangaru; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Development of an easy-to-handle range measurement tool using a plastic scintillator for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Fukushima; Minoru Hamada; Teiji Nishio; Koichi Maruyama
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fast range measurement of spot scanning proton beams using a volumetric liquid scintillator detector.

Authors:  CheukKai Hui; Daniel Robertson; Fahed Alsanea; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2015-07-30

5.  A systematic characterization of the low-energy photon response of plastic scintillation detectors.

Authors:  Jonathan Boivin; Sam Beddar; Chris Bonde; Daniel Schmidt; Wesley Culberson; Maxime Guillemette; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Quenching correction for volumetric scintillation dosimetry of proton beams.

Authors:  Daniel Robertson; Dragan Mirkovic; Narayan Sahoo; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  3D reconstruction of scintillation light emission from proton pencil beams using limited viewing angles-a simulation study.

Authors:  CheukKai Hui; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Determination of the quenching correction factors for plastic scintillation detectors in therapeutic high-energy proton beams.

Authors:  L L W Wang; L A Perles; L Archambault; N Sahoo; D Mirkovic; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Relating ionization quenching in organic plastic scintillators to basic material properties by modelling excitation density transport and amorphous track structure during proton irradiation.

Authors:  Jeppe Brage Christensen; Claus E Andersen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quality assurance in proton beam therapy using a plastic scintillator and a commercially available digital camera.

Authors:  Mansour Almurayshid; Yusuf Helo; Andrzej Kacperek; Jennifer Griffiths; Jem Hebden; Adam Gibson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.