Literature DB >> 32076664

Automated Myocardial T2 and Extracellular Volume Quantification in Cardiac MRI Using Transfer Learning-based Myocardium Segmentation.

Yanjie Zhu1, Ahmed S Fahmy1, Chong Duan1, Shiro Nakamori1, Reza Nezafat1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of an automated myocardial T2 and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification method using transfer learning of a fully convolutional neural network (CNN) pretrained to segment the myocardium on T1 mapping images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single CNN previously trained and tested using 11 550 manually segmented native T1-weighted images was used to segment the myocardium for automated myocardial T2 and ECV quantification. Reference measurements from 1525 manually processed T2 maps and 1525 ECV maps (from 305 patients) were used to evaluate the performance of the pretrained network. Correlation coefficient (R) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between automated and reference values on per-patient, per-slice, and per-segment analyses. Furthermore, transfer learning effectiveness in the CNN was evaluated by comparing its performance to four CNNs trained using manually segmented T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images and initialized using random-weights or weights of the pretrained CNN.
RESULTS: T2 and ECV measurements using the pretrained CNN strongly correlated with reference values in per-patient (T2: R = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 0.91; ECV: R = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.93), per-slice (T2: R = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.85; ECV: R = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.86), and per-segment (T2: R = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.77; ECV: R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.77) analyses. In Bland-Altman analysis, the automatic and reference values were in good agreement in per-patient (T2: 0.3 msec ± 2.9; ECV: -0.3% ± 1.7), per-slice (T2: 0.1 msec ± 4.6; ECV: -0.3% ± 2.5), and per-segment (T2: 0.0 msec ± 6.5; ECV: -0.4% ± 3.5) analyses. The performance of the pretrained network was comparable to networks refined or trained from scratch using additional manually segmented images.
CONCLUSION: Transfer learning extends the utility of pretrained CNN-based automated native T1 mapping analysis to T2 and ECV mapping without compromising performance. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32076664      PMCID: PMC6996604          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019190034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  30 in total

1.  Region-Based Convolutional Networks for Accurate Object Detection and Segmentation.

Authors:  Ross Girshick; Jeff Donahue; Trevor Darrell; Jitendra Malik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping.

Authors:  Kelvin Chow; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Jordin D Green; Joseph J Pagano; Matthias G Friedrich; Richard B Thompson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for myocardial T1 mapping with motion correction and parametric fitting.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Andreas Greiser; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Jens Guehring; Andrew E Arai; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Free-breathing multislice native myocardial T1 mapping using the slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) sequence.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Sébastien Roujol; Mehmet Akçakaya; Tamer A Basha; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Adaptive registration of varying contrast-weighted images for improved tissue characterization (ARCTIC): application to T1 mapping.

Authors:  Sébastien Roujol; Murilo Foppa; Sebastian Weingärtner; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Native Myocardial T1 as a Biomarker of Cardiac Structure in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Shingo Kato; Sebastien Roujol; Venkatesh Murthy; Steven Bellm; Abyaad Kashem; Tamer Basha; Jihye Jang; Aaron S Eisman; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  Impact of motion correction on reproducibility and spatial variability of quantitative myocardial T2 mapping.

Authors:  Sébastien Roujol; Tamer A Basha; Sebastian Weingärtner; Mehmet Akçakaya; Sophie Berg; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement.

Authors:  James C Moon; Daniel R Messroghli; Peter Kellman; Stefan K Piechnik; Matthew D Robson; Martin Ugander; Peter D Gatehouse; Andrew E Arai; Matthias G Friedrich; Stefan Neubauer; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Erik B Schelbert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Extracellular volume fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 1: evaluation of an automated method.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Joel R Wilson; Hui Xue; Martin Ugander; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of deep learning architectures on accelerated cardiac T1 mapping using MyoMapNet.

Authors:  Amine Amyar; Rui Guo; Xiaoying Cai; Salah Assana; Kelvin Chow; Jennifer Rodriguez; Tuyen Yankama; Julia Cirillo; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Long Ngo; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 2.  The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Augustin C Ogier; Aurelien Bustin; Hubert Cochet; Juerg Schwitter; Ruud B van Heeswijk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Retraining Convolutional Neural Networks for Specialized Cardiovascular Imaging Tasks: Lessons from Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Animesh Tandon; Navina Mohan; Cory Jensen; Barbara E U Burkhardt; Vasu Gooty; Daniel A Castellanos; Paige L McKenzie; Riad Abou Zahr; Abhijit Bhattaru; Mubeena Abdulkarim; Alborz Amir-Khalili; Alireza Sojoudi; Stephen M Rodriguez; Jeanne Dillenbeck; Gerald F Greil; Tarique Hussain
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Accelerated cardiac T1 mapping in four heartbeats with inline MyoMapNet: a deep learning-based T1 estimation approach.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Hossam El-Rewaidy; Salah Assana; Xiaoying Cai; Amine Amyar; Kelvin Chow; Xiaoming Bi; Tuyen Yankama; Julia Cirillo; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Long Ngo; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Radiomics and deep learning for myocardial scar screening in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ahmed S Fahmy; Ethan J Rowin; Arghavan Arafati; Talal Al-Otaibi; Martin S Maron; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.903

6.  Detection of liver cirrhosis in standard T2-weighted MRI using deep transfer learning.

Authors:  Sebastian Nowak; Narine Mesropyan; Anton Faron; Wolfgang Block; Martin Reuter; Ulrike I Attenberger; Julian A Luetkens; Alois M Sprinkart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.