Literature DB >> 35767308

Impact of deep learning architectures on accelerated cardiac T1 mapping using MyoMapNet.

Amine Amyar1, Rui Guo1, Xiaoying Cai1,2, Salah Assana1, Kelvin Chow3, Jennifer Rodriguez1, Tuyen Yankama1, Julia Cirillo1, Patrick Pierce1, Beth Goddu1, Long Ngo1, Reza Nezafat1.   

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to investigate the performance of various deep learning (DL) architectures for MyoMapNet, a DL model for T1 estimation using accelerated cardiac T1 mapping from four T1 -weighted images collected after a single inversion pulse (Look-Locker 4 [LL4]). We implemented and tested three DL architectures for MyoMapNet: (a) a fully connected neural network (FC), (b) convolutional neural networks (VGG19, ResNet50), and (c) encoder-decoder networks with skip connections (ResUNet, U-Net). Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) images from 749 patients at 3 T were used for training, validation, and testing. The first four T1 -weighted images from MOLLI5(3)3 and/or MOLLI4(1)3(1)2 protocols were extracted to create accelerated cardiac T1 mapping data. We also prospectively collected data from 28 subjects using MOLLI and LL4 to further evaluate model performance. Despite rigorous training, conventional VGG19 and ResNet50 models failed to produce anatomically correct T1 maps, and T1 values had significant errors. While ResUNet yielded good quality maps, it significantly underestimated T1 . Both FC and U-Net, however, yielded excellent image quality with good T1 accuracy for both native (FC/U-Net/MOLLI = 1217 ± 64/1208 ± 61/1199 ± 61 ms, all p < 0.05) and postcontrast myocardial T1 (FC/U-Net/MOLLI = 578 ± 57/567 ± 54/574 ± 55 ms, all p < 0.05). In terms of precision, the U-Net model yielded better T1 precision compared with the FC architecture (standard deviation of 61 vs. 67 ms for the myocardium for native [p < 0.05], and 31 vs. 38 ms [p < 0.05], for postcontrast). Similar findings were observed in prospectively collected LL4 data. It was concluded that U-Net and FC DL models in MyoMapNet enable fast myocardial T1 mapping using only four T1 -weighted images collected from a single LL sequence with comparable accuracy. U-Net also provides a slight improvement in precision.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac MRI; deep learning; inversion-recovery cardiac T1 mapping; myocardial tissue characterization

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35767308      PMCID: PMC9532368          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.478


  21 in total

1.  Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping.

Authors:  Kelvin Chow; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Jordin D Green; Joseph J Pagano; Matthias G Friedrich; Richard B Thompson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Deep model-based magnetic resonance parameter mapping network (DOPAMINE) for fast T1 mapping using variable flip angle method.

Authors:  Yohan Jun; Hyungseob Shin; Taejoon Eo; Taeseong Kim; Dosik Hwang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Three-dimensional Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Myocardial Scar Quantification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Multivendor Study.

Authors:  Ahmed S Fahmy; Ulf Neisius; Raymond H Chan; Ethan J Rowin; Warren J Manning; Martin S Maron; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Deep convolution neural networks based artifact suppression in under-sampled radial acquisitions of myocardial T 1 mapping images.

Authors:  Maryam Nezafat; Hossam El-Rewaidy; Selcuk Kucukseymen; Thomas H Hauser; Ahmed S Fahmy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Deep learning reconstruction for cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 mapping.

Authors:  Jesse I Hamilton; Danielle Currey; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Fast and accurate calculation of myocardial T1 and T2 values using deep learning Bloch equation simulations (DeepBLESS).

Authors:  Jiaxin Shao; Vahid Ghodrati; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 7.  Cardiac T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Philip Haaf; Pankaj Garg; Daniel R Messroghli; David A Broadbent; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Aggarwal; Viknesh Sounderajah; Guy Martin; Daniel S W Ting; Alan Karthikesalingam; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-04-07

10.  Accelerated cardiac T1 mapping in four heartbeats with inline MyoMapNet: a deep learning-based T1 estimation approach.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Hossam El-Rewaidy; Salah Assana; Xiaoying Cai; Amine Amyar; Kelvin Chow; Xiaoming Bi; Tuyen Yankama; Julia Cirillo; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Long Ngo; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.