Literature DB >> 33394116

Retraining Convolutional Neural Networks for Specialized Cardiovascular Imaging Tasks: Lessons from Tetralogy of Fallot.

Animesh Tandon1,2,3, Navina Mohan4, Cory Jensen5, Barbara E U Burkhardt4,6,7, Vasu Gooty8, Daniel A Castellanos4,6, Paige L McKenzie4, Riad Abou Zahr4,6,9, Abhijit Bhattaru4,6, Mubeena Abdulkarim4,6, Alborz Amir-Khalili5, Alireza Sojoudi5, Stephen M Rodriguez4, Jeanne Dillenbeck10, Gerald F Greil4,10,6, Tarique Hussain4,10,6.   

Abstract

Ventricular contouring of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for volumetric analysis for repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), but can be time-consuming and subject to variability. A convolutional neural network (CNN) ventricular contouring algorithm was developed to generate contours for mostly structural normal hearts. We aimed to improve this algorithm for use in rTOF and propose a more comprehensive method of evaluating algorithm performance. We evaluated the performance of a ventricular contouring CNN, that was trained on mostly structurally normal hearts, on rTOF patients. We then created an updated CNN by adding rTOF training cases and evaluated the new algorithm's performance generating contours for both the left and right ventricles (LV and RV) on new testing data. Algorithm performance was evaluated with spatial metrics (Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, and average Hausdorff distance) and volumetric comparisons (e.g., differences in RV volumes). The original Mostly Structurally Normal (MSN) algorithm was better at contouring the LV than the RV in patients with rTOF. After retraining the algorithm, the new MSN + rTOF algorithm showed improvements for LV epicardial and RV endocardial contours on testing data to which it was naïve (N = 30; e.g., DSC 0.883 vs. 0.905 for LV epicardium at end diastole, p < 0.0001) and improvements in RV end-diastolic volumetrics (median %error 8.1 vs 11.4, p = 0.0022). Even with a small number of cases, CNN-based contouring for rTOF can be improved. This work should be extended to other forms of congenital heart disease with more extreme structural abnormalities. Aspects of this work have already been implemented in clinical practice, representing rapid clinical translation. The combined use of both spatial and volumetric comparisons yielded insights into algorithm errors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Convolutional neural network; Machine learning; Tetralogy of fallot; Ventricular contouring

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394116      PMCID: PMC7990832          DOI: 10.1007/s00246-020-02518-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  36 in total

1.  Multimodality noninvasive imaging for assessment of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ashwin Prakash; Andrew J Powell; Tal Geva
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Karen K Stout; Curt J Daniels; Jamil A Aboulhosn; Biykem Bozkurt; Craig S Broberg; Jack M Colman; Stephen R Crumb; Joseph A Dearani; Stephanie Fuller; Michelle Gurvitz; Paul Khairy; Michael J Landzberg; Arwa Saidi; Anne Marie Valente; George F Van Hare
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Utility of machine learning algorithms in assessing patients with a systemic right ventricle.

Authors:  Gerhard-Paul Diller; Sonya Babu-Narayan; Wei Li; Jelena Radojevic; Aleksander Kempny; Anselm Uebing; Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Helmut Baumgartner; Michael A Gatzoulis; Stefan Orwat
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort.

Authors:  Steffen E Petersen; Nay Aung; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Jane M Francis; Mohammed Y Khanji; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Paul Leeson; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery: Irrational hype or paradigm shift?

Authors:  Anthony C Chang
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019 Sep-Dec

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: state of the art and implications for the imaging cardiologist.

Authors:  K R Siegersma; T Leiner; D P Chew; Y Appelman; L Hofstra; J W Verjans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: what the general cardiologist should know.

Authors:  D P Ripley; T A Musa; L E Dobson; S Plein; J P Greenwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  2 in total

1.  SOSPCNN: Structurally Optimized Stochastic Pooling Convolutional Neural Network for Tetralogy of Fallot recognition.

Authors:  Shui-Hua Wang; Kaihong Wu; Tianshu Chu; Steven L Fernandes; Qinghua Zhou; Yu-Dong Zhang; Jian Sun
Journal:  Wirel Commun Mob Comput       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.336

Review 2.  The role of machine learning applications in diagnosing and assessing critical and non-critical CHD: a scoping review.

Authors:  Stephanie M Helman; Elizabeth A Herrup; Adam B Christopher; Salah S Al-Zaiti
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.093

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.