| Literature DB >> 32076038 |
Roma Patel1, Shahnawaz D Jadeja1, Sayantani Pramanik Palit1, Nirali Rathwa1, Ankit Mahajan2,3, A V Ramachandran4, Manoj K Dhar3, Swarkar Sharma2, Rasheedunnisa Begum5.
Abstract
Adiponectin is a prime determinant of the status of insulin resistance. Association studies between adiponectin (ADIPOQ) gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and metabolic diseases have been reported earlier. However, results are ambiguous due to apparent contradictions. Hence, we investigated (1) the association between ADIPOQ SNPs: -11377C/G, +10211T/G, +45T/G and +276G/T for the risk towards type 2 diabetes (T2D) and, (2) genotype-phenotype association of these SNPs with various biochemical parameters in two cohorts. Genomic DNA of diabetic patients and controls from Gujarat and, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) were genotyped using PCR-RFLP, TaqMan assay and MassArray. Transcript levels of ADIPOQ were assessed in visceral adipose tissue samples, and plasma adiponectin levels were estimated by qPCR and ELISA respectively. Results suggest: (i) reduced HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in Gujarat patients and its association with +10211T/G and +276G/T, and reduced ADIPOQ transcript levels in T2D, (ii) association of the above SNPs with increased FBG, BMI, TG, TC in Gujarat patients and (iii) increased GGTG haplotype in obese patients of Gujarat population and, (iv) association of -11377C/G with T2D in J&K population. Reduced HMW adiponectin, in the backdrop of obesity and ADIPOQ genetic variants might alter metabolic profile posing risk towards T2D.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32076038 PMCID: PMC7031532 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59845-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Genotype and allele frequencies distribution of ADIPOQ SNPs in T2D patients in Gujarat and J&K population.
| SNP | N | Genotype | Allele | Odds Ratio [95% CI] ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allelic | Additive | Dominant | Recessive | ||||||
| CC | CG + GG | C | G | 1.23 [0.95–1.59] (0.118) | 0.2644 | 1.46 [0.72–2.95] (0.1443) | 1.28 [0.92–1.77] (0.1432) | ||
| Controls | 286 | 155 | 131 | 427 | 145 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 285 | 137 | 148 | 402 | 168 | ||||
| TT | TG + GG | T | G | 2.33 [1.85–2.93] ( | 1.46 [0.15–2.02] ( | 1.79 [1.36–2.35] ( | |||
| Controls | 493 | 363 | 130 | 847 | 139 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 475 | 289 | 186 | 687 | 236 | ||||
| TT | TG + GG | T | G | 0.86 [0.64–1.18] (0.3722) | 0.6704 | 0.74 [0.22- 2.55] (0.6325) | 0.86 [0.61- 1.21] (0.3954) | ||
| Controls | 467 | 362 | 105 | 822 | 112 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 359 | 287 | 72 | 642 | 76 | ||||
| GG | GT + TT | G | T | 1.72 [1.42–2.09] ( | 1.99 [1.28–3.08] (0.0018) | 2.05 [1.57–2.65] ( | |||
| Controls | 489 | 255 | 216 | 692 | 250 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 464 | 172 | 298 | 579 | 361 | ||||
| CC | CG + GG | C | G | 1.34 [1.05–1.69] (0.0168) | 0.0365 | 1.26 [0.67–2.36] (0.2294) | 1.47 [1.09–1.96] (0.0101) | ||
| Controls | 290 | 151 | 139 | 423 | 157 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 503 | 309 | 194 | 787 | 219 | ||||
| TT | TG + GG | T | G | 0.95 [0.70–1.29] (0.3827) | — | — | 0.95 [0.71–1.27] (0.3663) | ||
| Controls | 300 | 141 | 159 | 206 | 94 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 507 | 232 | 275 | 343 | 164 | ||||
| TT | TG + GG | T | G | 0.72 [0.52–1.02] (0.0613) | 0.2041 | 0.646 [0.23–1.83] (0.2039) | 0.71 [0.49–1.04] (0.0788) | ||
| Controls | 299 | 251 | 48 | 545 | 53 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 507 | 400 | 107 | 894 | 120 | ||||
| GG | GT + TT | G | T | 1.09 [0.86–1.40] (0.2248) | 0.7452 | 1.12 [0.59–2.13] (0.3670) | 1.12 [0.83–1.51] (0.2247) | ||
| Controls | 289 | 170 | 119 | 443 | 135 | ||||
| T2D Patients | 502 | 309 | 193 | 786 | 218 | ||||
#Values were Imputed using CEU data from 1000 genome (Phase 3) as reference dataset and analyses was carried out in PLINK ver 1.07.
Haplotype frequencies in lean and obese patients in Gujarat population.
| Haplotype | Obese Patients (Frequency %) (n = 330) | Lean Patients (Frequency %) (n = 150) | Odd Ratio [95%CI] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C G T G* | 24.49 (0.129) | 61.62 (0.081) | 0.0397 | 2.26 × 10−8 | 1.68 [1.020~2.780] |
| C G T T* | 15.12 (0.080) | 25.66 (0.034) | 0.0053 | 2.48 [1.285~4.799] | |
| C T G G | 12.57 (0.066) | 35.80 (0.047) | 0.2851 | 1.43 [0.738~2.791] | |
| C T T G* | 53.25 (0.280) | 273.96 (0.361) | 0.0317 | 0.67 [0.474~0.968] | |
| C T T T* | 17.77 (0.094) | 133.56 (0.176) | 0.0051 | 0.47 [0.283~0.809] | |
| 15.34 (0.081) | 16.02 (0.021) | 3.87 × 10−5 | 4.10 [1.993~8.434] | ||
| G T T G* | 14.89 (0.078) | 106.21 (0.140) | 0.0219 | 0.51 [0.293~0.917] | |
| G T T T* | 19.89 (0.105) | 39.53 (0.052) | 0.0072 | 2.14 [1.215~3.774] |
*Indicates haplotypes significantly associated with obesity induced T2D. Frequency <0.03 were ignored in the analysis. The haplotypes in J&K population could not be assessed as the data for +10211T/G (rs17846866) was imputed.
Figure 1ADIPOQ transcript levels and plasma adiponectin levels in Gujarat population. (A) Relative gene expression of VAT ADIPOQ in controls and patients: Significant decrease in ADIPOQ transcript levels was observed in patients (Mean ∆Cp ± SEM: 1.639 ± 0.3829 v/s 6.681 ± 0.6558; p = 0.0187), (B) Relative fold change of ADIPOQ expression in controls and patients. Expression of ADIPOQ transcripts in T2D patients as compared to controls was decreased by 0.84 fold as determined by the 2-ΔΔCp method. (Controls n = 14; T2D patients n = 10). (C) Association of ADIPOQ polymorphisms with ADIPOQ transcript levels. No association between ADIPOQ polymorphisms and ADIPOQ transcript levels (p > 0.05). HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in (D) controls versus patients. Plasma HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in patients were significantly lower than in controls, (E) control and diabetic males and females. HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in control and patient females were significantly higher than in control and patient males and (F) lean (L) and obese (O) control and diabetic subjects. Obese patients showed significantly reduced HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). (Controls n = 37; T2D patients n = 45).
Genotype-phenotype association analyses of ADIPOQ SNPs with metabolic parameters in Gujarat population.
| Genotype/Allele | FBG (mg/dL) | BMI (Kg/m2) | TG (mg/dL) | TC (mg/dL) | HDL-c (mg/dL) | LDL-c (mg/dL) | HMW adiponectin: total adiponectin (µg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||||||
| | 124.50 (50.02) | 25.37 (5.28) | 123.00 (79.00) | 161.70 (39.47) | 36.81 (10.73) | 45.17 (14.02) | 93.83 (37.5) | 0.97 (0.48) |
| | 124.70 (51.02) | 25.57 (5.95) | 150.00 (102.00) | 162.70 (39.52) | 37.59 (9.30) | 34.63 (9.96) | 101.90 (39.36) | 1.00 (0.54) |
| | 124.10 (30.64) | 26.36 (5.51) | 166.00 (84.00) | 156.40 (37.13) | 39.75 (13.25) | 26.56 (1.51) | 101.40 (32.03) | 0.64 (0.24) |
| 0.6241 | 0.4906 | 0.8671 | 0.7369 | 0.2055 | ||||
| | 130.00 (56.13) | 25.60 (5.90) | 135.80 (92.00) | 151.60 (27.89) | 42.79 (14.38) | 43.18 (14.57) | 96.86 (37.5) | 1.50 (0.61) |
| | 132.20 (55.11) | 25.33 (5.20) | 138.90 (78.00) | 162.20 (38.97) | 41.62 (21.49) | 44.16 (13.51) | 96.64 (46.54) | 0.86 (0.39) |
| | 148.10 (56.86) | 27.82 (5.60) | 166.40 (85.60) | 175.60 (39.02) | 37.76 (12.92) | 34.22 (8.07) | 99.20 (37.57) | 0.82 (0.36) |
| 0.6024 | ||||||||
| | 155.40 (4.26) | 26.82 (5.20) | 164.00 (14.8) | 163.80 (37.00) | 36.62 (11.85) | 40.53 (12.36) | 95.79 (39.5) | 0.98 (1.20) |
| | 171.50 (12.96) | 27.16 (5.29) | 172.80 (20.3) | 164.50 (44.91) | 36.51 (11.00) | 40.42 (14.46) | 96.75 (39.26) | 0.83 (0.38) |
| | 122.50 (8.50) | 30.05 (3.748) | 103.90 (15.28) | 185.70 (27.61) | 34.57 (6.734) | 41.27 (11.80) | 94.87 (37.83) | 0.82 (0.30) |
| 0.3293 | 0.2619 | 0.6088 | 0.4735 | 0.9708 | 0.9936 | 0.9396 | 0.9284 | |
| | 151.00 (53.88) | 24.98 (4.53) | 143.30 (78.00) | 153.20 (29.34) | 37.87 (12.34) | 40.64 (12.52) | 70.36 (27.13) | 1.36 (0.63) |
| | 166.90 (69.67) | 27.69 (5.53) | 165.20 (89.00) | 154.70 (32.12) | 35.78 (10.48) | 39.25 (12.56) | 92.99 (36.33) | 0.93 (0.44) |
| | 303.80 (94.54) | 29.75 (4.23) | 266.60 (90.00) | 189.00 (25.96) | 33.28 (11.93) | 37.34 (6.34) | 90.62 (34.1) | 0.75 (0.33) |
| 0.0831 | ||||||||
Data represented as Mean (SD).
Figure 2Role of ADIPOQ SNPs in T2D: The ADIPOQ CGTT, GTTT and GGTG haplotypes in presence of ADIPOQ +10211T/G (rs17846866) and +276G/T (rs1501299) along with decreased transcript, plasma HMW adiponectin and total adiponectin, and increased TNFα, FFA, resistin leads to altered metabolic profile thereby contributing to insulin resistance and T2D in Gujarat population.