| Literature DB >> 23863826 |
Anoop Misra1, Usha Shrivastava.
Abstract
Obesity and dyslipidemia are emerging as major public health challenges in South Asian countries. The prevalence of obesity is more in urban areas than rural, and women are more affected than men. Further, obesity in childhood and adolescents is rising rapidly. Obesity in South Asians has characteristic features: high prevalence of abdominal obesity, with more intra-abdominal and truncal subcutaneous adiposity than white Caucasians. In addition, there is greater accumulation of fat at "ectopic" sites, namely the liver and skeletal muscles. All these features lead to higher magnitude of insulin resistance, and its concomitant metabolic disorders (the metabolic syndrome) including atherogenic dyslipidemia. Because of the occurrence of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and other cardiovascular morbidities at a lower range of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), it is proposed that cut-offs for both measures of obesity should be lower (BMI 23-24.9 kg/m(2) for overweight and ≥ 25 kg/m(2) for obesity, WC ≥ 80 cm for women and ≥ 90 cm for men for abdominal obesity) for South Asians, and a consensus guideline for these revised measures has been developed for Asian Indians. Increasing obesity and dyslipidemia in South Asians is primarily driven by nutrition, lifestyle and demographic transitions, increasingly faulty diets and physical inactivity, in the background of genetic predisposition. Dietary guidelines for prevention of obesity and diabetes, and physical activity guidelines for Asian Indians are now available. Intervention programs with emphasis on improving knowledge, attitude and practices regarding healthy nutrition, physical activity and stress management need to be implemented. Evidence for successful intervention program for prevention of childhood obesity and for prevention of diabetes is available for Asian Indians, and could be applied to all South Asian countries with similar cultural and lifestyle profiles. Finally, more research on pathophysiology, guidelines for cut-offs, and culturally-specific lifestyle management of obesity, dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome are needed for South Asians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23863826 PMCID: PMC3738996 DOI: 10.3390/nu5072708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Cut-offs of obesity and abdominal obesity for Asian Indians vs. international criteria.
| Variable | Consensus guidelines for Asian Indians a | Prevalent International Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Generalized obesity | Normal: 18.0–22.9 | Normal: 18.5–24.9 b |
| (BMI cut-offs in kg/m2) | Overweight: 23.0–24.9 | Overweight: 25.0–29.9 b
|
| Abdominal obesity (Waist circumference cut-offs in cm) | Men: | Men: |
Notes: a From Consensus guidelines for Asian Indians [28]; b According to World Health Organization guidelines [32]; c Both as per Consensus Guidelines for Asian Indians [28] and International Diabetes Federation [33]; d According to Modified National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines [34]; Adapted from [27].
Prevalence of obesity in South Asians.
| Studies | Location in India/urban/rural | Age (year) | Sample population (men) | Sample population (women) | Criteria (BMI in kg/m2 and WC in cm) | Prevalence (%) in men | Prevalence (%) in women |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dhurandhar
| West India (Urban) | >15 | 791 | 791 | BMI: | 4.8 | 7.8 |
| Gupta
| North India (Urban) | ≥20 | 532 | 559 | WC: >102 (M), ≥88 (F) | 21.8 | 44.0 |
| Misra
| North India(Urban) ** | >18 | 170 | 362 | BMI: | 13.3 | 15.6 |
| Gupta
| North India (Urban) | >20 | 960 | 840 | WC: ≥102 (M); ≥88 (F) | 25.6 | 44.0 |
| Prabhakaran
| North Indian(industrial population) | 20–59 | 2935 * | BMI: | 35.0 *43.0 * | ||
| Misra
| North India(Urban) | 38.9 | 640 * | WC: ≥90 (M); ≥80 (F) | 10.1 | 25.9 | |
| Gupta
| North India(Urban) *** | Mean: 43.2 (M) 44.7 (F) | 226 | 232 | BMI: ≥30, WC: ≥102 (M); ≥88 (F) | 20.8 | 34.5 |
| Deepa
| South India(Urban) | >20 | 2350 * | BMI: ≥25 WC: ≥90 (M); ≥80 (F) | 43.256.2 | 47.435.1 | |
| Wijewardene
| Sri Lanka | 30–65 | 2692 | 3355 | BMI: ≥25 | 20.3 | 36.5 |
| Zaman
| Bangladesh (Rural) | >18 | 238 | 272 | WC: ≥94 (M); ≥80 (F) | 2.9 | 16.8 |
| Nanan [ | Pakistan | 25–64 | National Survey | BMI: >30 | 13 | 23 | |
| Vaidya
| Kathmandu, Nepal (urban) | 21–57 | 341 | BMI: >25 | 33 | ||
| Chow
| South India(rural) | 20–90 | 4535 * | BMI: >25 WC: ≥90 (M); ≥80 (F) | 32.4 | 41.4 | |
| Bhardwaj
| North India (urban) | >18 | 217 | 242 | BMI: >25, WC: ≥90 (M); ≥80 (F) | 50.2 | 50 |
| Gupta
| West India (Urban) | 35–70 | 4621 | WC: ≥102 (M); ≥88 (F) | 14.4 | ||
Notes: * Overall including male and female; ** Data from urban slum population of New Delhi, north India; *** Data from Punjabi Bhatia community in north India; M, Male; F, Female; BMI, Body mass index; WC, Waist circumference; Adapted from [9].
Predictive equations for estimation of various body fat depots in Asian Indians.
| Variable predictive equation |
|---|
| %BF: 42.42 + 0.003 × age + 7.04 × gender + 0.42 × TR sf + 0.29 × WC + 0.22 × Wt − 0.42 × Ht |
| TAF: −47,657.00 + 1384.11 × gender + 1466.54 × BMI + 416.10 × WC |
| IAAT: −238.7 + 16.9 × age + 934.18 × gender + 578.09 × BMI − 441.06 × HC + 434.2 × WC |
| SCAT: −49,376.4 − 17.15 × age + 1016.5 × gender + 783.3 × BMI + 466 × HC |
Notes: %BF, % Body fat; gender: M = 1, F = 2; TR sf, Triceps skinfold; WC, Waist circumference; Wt, Weight; Ht, Height; BMI, Body mass index; HC, Hip circumference; TAF, Total abdominal fat; IAAT, Intra-abdominal adipose tissue; SCAT, Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue; Adapted from [48].
Figure 1Comparative pictures of enlarged adipocytes from South Asian (left) and White (right) volunteers. Both images are obtained with SPOT digital camera using 10 magnification. Note: this figure is reproduced with permission from [74]. Copyright Chandalia et al., 2007.
Prevalence of obesity and cardio-metabolic risk factors in urban population of New Delhi, India (n = 459).
| Variable | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Obesity (BMI criteria) | 50.1 |
| Impaired Fasting Glucose | 24 |
| Diabetes | 8.5 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 26.6 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 42.7 |
| LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL | 51.6 |
| HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (males) and <50 mg/dL (females) | 37 |
Notes: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 defined as obesity; LDL-C = low Density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol; Adapted from [48].
Differences in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels between South Asians/Asian Indians vs. Whites/Europeans. Note: this table is reproduced with permission from [27]. Copyright The Endocrine Society, 2008.
| Author |
| Parameter | South Asians/Asian Indians | Whites/Europeans |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Chandalia
| 1031 AIs and 455 Whites a | Percent population j with low HDL | M, (42% m; 52% n); F, (56% m; 72% n) | M, 35%; F, 25% * |
| Ajjan
| 245 SAs and 245 UK Whites | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.10 | 1.43 ** |
| Williams
| 63 SAs and 42 Europeans b | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.27 | 1.20 |
| Smith
| 82 AIs and 83 Caucasians c | HDL (mmol/L) | M, 0.97; F, 1.13 | M, 1.24; F, 1.51 * |
| Somani
| 141 SAs and 121 Whites | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| Bhalodkar
| 119 AIs and 1752 Caucasians d | HDL (mmol/L) HDL size (nm) k | 1.378.9 | 1.379.4 |
| Forouhi
| 113 SAs and Caucasians e | HDL (mmol/L) | M, 1.26, F, 1.51 | M, 1.39; F, 1.56 |
| Chambers
| 518 AIs and 507 Whites f | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.22 | 1.33 ** |
| Enas
| 1131 AI men and 557 AI women compared with Caucasians from FOS g | HDL (mmol/L) l | M, 0.98; F, 1.24 | M, 1.18 **; F, 1.45 ** |
| McKeigue
| 1421 SAs and 1515 Europeans h | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.16 | 1.25 |
| McKeigue
| 253 Bangladeshis and Europeans i | HDL (mmol/L)Percent of TC as HDL (%) | M, 1.13; F, 1.19M, 21.3; F, 22.4 | M, 1.43; F, 1.45M, 25.3; F, 25.2 |
|
| ||||
| Ehtisham
| 65 SAs and 64 European adolescents (14–17 years) | HDL (mmol/L) | M, 1.28; F, 1.49 | M, 1.39; F, 1.67 |
| Whincup
| 73 SAs and 1287 Caucasian children (10–11 years) | HDL (mmol/L) | 1.38 | 1.43 |
Notes: AI, Asian Indian; BMI, body mass index; CURES, The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study; F, female; FOS, Framingham Offspring Study; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; M, male; N, number of sample population; SA; South Asians; TC, total cholesterol; UK, United Kingdom; a Indigenous Asian Indians from CURES study; b Men aged 35–75 years; c Aged 20–60 years; d Women from the Framingham Offspring Study; e BMI matched, aged 40–55 years; f Aged 35–60 years; g Women from the Framingham Offspring Study; h Males; i Aged 35–69 years; j Low HDL: males < 1.036 mmol/L and females < 1.295 mmol/L; k HDL particle size in nanometers; l Men aged 30–39 years, and women aged 30–59 years; m Urban; n Rural; * p < 0.0001; ** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Age-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in different groups of women (rural-urban, urban and urban-rural migrants) as compared with the rural women, high prevalence of high waist circumference ≥80 cm, and hypercholesterolemia ≥200 mg/dL among rural-urban migrants and urban women. The prevalence declines among the urban-rural migrants. Note: this figure is reproduced with permission from [49]. Copyright the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd., 2011.
Figure 3Complex interactions of genetic, perinatal, nutritional and other acquired factors in development of insulin resistance, type-2 diabetes and coronary heart disease in South Asians. T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; CRP, C-reactive protein; CHD coronary heart disease. Adapted from [9].