Sally L Baxter1,2, Helena E Gali1,2, Michael F Chiang3,4, Michelle R Hribar3,4, Lucila Ohno-Machado2,5, Robert El-Kareh2, Abigail E Huang3, Heather E Chen1, Andrew S Camp1, Don O Kikkawa1, Bobby S Korn1, Jeffrey E Lee1, Christopher A Longhurst2, Marlene Millen2. 1. Shiley Eye Institute and Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States. 2. Health Sciences Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States. 3. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States. 5. Division of Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate informatics-enabled quality improvement (QI) strategies for promoting time spent on face-to-face communication between ophthalmologists and patients. METHODS: This prospective study involved deploying QI strategies during implementation of an enterprise-wide vendor electronic health record (EHR) in an outpatient academic ophthalmology department. Strategies included developing single sign-on capabilities, activating mobile- and tablet-based applications, EHR personalization training, creating novel workflows for team-based orders, and promoting problem-based charting to reduce documentation burden. Timing data were collected during 648 outpatient encounters. Outcomes included total time spent by the attending ophthalmologist on the patient, time spent on documentation, time spent on examination, and time spent talking with the patient. Metrics related to documentation efficiency, use of personalization features, use of team-based orders, and note length were also measured from the EHR efficiency portal and compared with averages for ophthalmologists nationwide using the same EHR. RESULTS: Time spent on exclusive face-to-face communication with patients initially decreased with EHR implementation (2.9 to 2.3 minutes, p = 0.005) but returned to the paper baseline by 6 months (2.8 minutes, p = 0.99). Observed participants outperformed national averages of ophthalmologists using the same vendor system on documentation time per appointment, number of customized note templates, number of customized order lists, utilization of team-based orders, note length, and time spent after-hours on EHR use. CONCLUSION: Informatics-enabled QI interventions can promote patient-centeredness and face-to-face communication in high-volume outpatient ophthalmology encounters. By employing an array of interventions, time spent exclusively talking with the patient returned to levels equivalent to paper charts by 6 months after EHR implementation. This was achieved without requiring EHR redesign, use of scribes, or excessive after-hours work. Documentation efficiency can be achieved using interventions promoting personalization and team-based workflows. Given their efficacy in preserving face-to-face physician-patient interactions, these strategies may help alleviate risk of physician burnout. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate informatics-enabled quality improvement (QI) strategies for promoting time spent on face-to-face communication between ophthalmologists and patients. METHODS: This prospective study involved deploying QI strategies during implementation of an enterprise-wide vendor electronic health record (EHR) in an outpatient academic ophthalmology department. Strategies included developing single sign-on capabilities, activating mobile- and tablet-based applications, EHR personalization training, creating novel workflows for team-based orders, and promoting problem-based charting to reduce documentation burden. Timing data were collected during 648 outpatient encounters. Outcomes included total time spent by the attending ophthalmologist on the patient, time spent on documentation, time spent on examination, and time spent talking with the patient. Metrics related to documentation efficiency, use of personalization features, use of team-based orders, and note length were also measured from the EHR efficiency portal and compared with averages for ophthalmologists nationwide using the same EHR. RESULTS: Time spent on exclusive face-to-face communication with patients initially decreased with EHR implementation (2.9 to 2.3 minutes, p = 0.005) but returned to the paper baseline by 6 months (2.8 minutes, p = 0.99). Observed participants outperformed national averages of ophthalmologists using the same vendor system on documentation time per appointment, number of customized note templates, number of customized order lists, utilization of team-based orders, note length, and time spent after-hours on EHR use. CONCLUSION: Informatics-enabled QI interventions can promote patient-centeredness and face-to-face communication in high-volume outpatient ophthalmology encounters. By employing an array of interventions, time spent exclusively talking with the patient returned to levels equivalent to paper charts by 6 months after EHR implementation. This was achieved without requiring EHR redesign, use of scribes, or excessive after-hours work. Documentation efficiency can be achieved using interventions promoting personalization and team-based workflows. Given their efficacy in preserving face-to-face physician-patient interactions, these strategies may help alleviate risk of physician burnout. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Rubina F Rizvi; Jenna L Marquard; Marcus A Seywerd; Terrence J Adam; Jed T Elison; Gretchen M Hultman; Kathleen A Harder; Genevieve B Melton Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2017
Authors: Sarah Read-Brown; Michelle R Hribar; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna H Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston D Chamberlain; Steven T Bailey; Jessica B Wallace; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Richard Frankel; Andrea Altschuler; Sheba George; James Kinsman; Holly Jimison; Nan R Robertson; John Hsu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: C Mitsch; P Huber; K Kriechbaum; C Scholda; G Duftschmid; T Wrba; U Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Christopher A Longhurst; Taylor Davis; Amy Maneker; H C Eschenroeder; Rachel Dunscombe; George Reynolds; Brian Clay; Thomas Moran; David B Graham; Shannon M Dean; Julia Adler-Milstein Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Lindsay A Stevens; Yumi T DiAngi; Jonathan D Schremp; Monet J Martorana; Roberta E Miller; Tzielan C Lee; Natalie M Pageler Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Terrence C Lee; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Mahasweta Nayak; Alison X Chan; John J McDermott; Bita Shahrvini; Gordon Y Ye; Amy M Sitapati; Camille Nebeker; Sally L Baxter Journal: Ophthalmol Sci Date: 2022-04-05