Literature DB >> 16050873

Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Richard Frankel1, Andrea Altschuler, Sheba George, James Kinsman, Holly Jimison, Nan R Robertson, John Hsu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of exam-room computers on communication between clinicians and patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Longitudinal, qualitative study using videotapes of regularly scheduled visits from 3 points in time: 1 month before, 1 month after, and 7 months after introduction of computers into the exam room.
SETTING: Primary care medical clinic in a large integrated delivery system. PARTICIPANTS: Nine clinicians (6 physicians, 2 physician assistants, and 1 nurse practitioner) and 54 patients.
RESULTS: The introduction of computers into the exam room affected the visual, verbal, and postural connection between clinicians and patients. There were variations across the visits in the magnitude and direction of the computer's effect. We identified 4 domains in which exam-room computing affected clinician-patient communication: visit organization, verbal and nonverbal behavior, computer navigation and mastery, and spatial organization of the exam room. We observed a range of facilitating and inhibiting effects on clinician-patient communication in all 4 domains. For 2 domains, visit organization and verbal and nonverbal behavior, facilitating and inhibiting behaviors observed prior to the introduction of the computer appeared to be amplified when exam-room computing occurred. Likewise, exam-room computing involving navigation and mastery skills and spatial organization of the exam-room created communication challenges and opportunities. In all 4 domains, there was little change observed in exam-room computing behaviors from the point of introduction to 7-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective use of computers in the outpatient exam room may be dependent upon clinicians' baseline skills that are carried forward and are amplified, positively or negatively, in their effects on clinician-patient communication. Computer use behaviors do not appear to change much over the first 7 months. Administrators and educators interested in improving exam-room computer use by clinicians need to better understand clinician skills and previous work habits associated with electronic medical records. More study of the effects of new technologies on the clinical relationship is also needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050873      PMCID: PMC1490186          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

Review 1.  How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

Authors:  K J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  NHS national programme for information technology: changes must involve clinicians and show the value to patient care.

Authors:  John Powell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

3.  A new model for physician-patient communication.

Authors:  V F Keller; J G Carroll
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1994-06

4.  Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  L Cooper-Patrick; J J Gallo; J J Gonzales; H T Vu; N R Powe; C Nelson; D E Ford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The patient-physician relationship. JAMA focuses on the center of medicine.

Authors:  R M Glass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient communication.

Authors:  T S Inui; W B Carter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices.

Authors:  J Schmittdiel; K Grumbach; J V Selby; C P Quesenberry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Evidence on patient-doctor communication.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; H Boon; J Galajda; L Meredith; M Sangster
Journal:  Cancer Prev Control       Date:  1999-02

10.  A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings.

Authors:  W Levinson; R Gorawara-Bhat; J Lamb
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  67 in total

1.  Understanding the Knowledge Gap Experienced by U.S. Safety Net Patients in Teleretinal Screening.

Authors:  Sheba M George; Erin Moran Hayes; Allison Fish; Lauren Patty Daskivich; Omolola I Ogunyemi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Moral and prudential considerations in adopting electronic medical records.

Authors:  Win Phillips; David A Fleming
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

3.  Electronic medical record use in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Alexander G Fiks; Evaline A Alessandrini; Christopher B Forrest; Saira Khan; A Russell Localio; Andreas Gerber
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Gradual electronic health record implementation: new insights on physician and patient adaptation.

Authors:  Renée R Shield; Roberta E Goldman; David A Anthony; Nina Wang; Richard J Doyle; Jeffrey Borkan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Quantitative ethnographic study of physician workflow and interactions with electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Erin Chiou; Enid Montague
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.656

6.  What will it take to bring the Internet into the consulting room? We cannot remain oblivious to our patients' expectations.

Authors:  Alejandro Alex R Jadad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Mindy E Flanagan; Alissa L Russ; Carmit K McMullen; Leora Elli; Scott A Russell; Katelyn J Bennett; Marianne S Matthias; Shakaib U Rehman; Mark D Schwartz; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Working with an Electronic Medical Record in Ambulatory Care: A Study of Patient Perceptions of Intrusiveness

Authors:  Milisa K Rizer; Cynthia Sieck; Jennifer S Lehman; Jennifer L Hefner; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-01-01

9.  Capturing the patients' voices: Planning for patient-centered electronic health record use.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Jeanne Tyszka; Kathlyn E Fletcher
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Steven R Hahn; Roger K Cady; Jan Lewis Brandes; Suzanne E Simons; Philip A Bain; Meaghan R Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.