Literature DB >> 29049512

Time Requirements for Electronic Health Record Use in an Academic Ophthalmology Center.

Sarah Read-Brown1, Michelle R Hribar2, Leah G Reznick1, Lorinna H Lombardi1, Mansi Parikh1, Winston D Chamberlain1, Steven T Bailey1, Jessica B Wallace2, Thomas R Yackel2, Michael F Chiang1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Electronic health record (EHR) systems have transformed the practice of medicine. However, physicians have raised concerns that EHR time requirements have negatively affected their productivity. Meanwhile, evolving approaches toward physician reimbursement will require additional documentation to measure quality and cost of care. To date, little quantitative analysis has rigorously studied these topics. Objective: To examine ophthalmologist time requirements for EHR use. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center cohort study was conducted between September 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, among 27 stable departmental ophthalmologists (defined as attending ophthalmologists who worked at the study institution for ≥6 months before and after the study period). Ophthalmologists who did not have a standard clinical practice or who did not use the EHR were excluded. Exposures: Time stamps from the medical record and EHR audit log were analyzed to measure the length of time required by ophthalmologists for EHR use. Ophthalmologists underwent manual time-motion observation to measure the length of time spent directly with patients on the following 3 activities: EHR use, conversation, and examination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study outcomes were time spent by ophthalmologists directly with patients on EHR use, conversation, and examination as well as total time required by ophthalmologists for EHR use.
Results: Among the 27 ophthalmologists in this study (10 women and 17 men; mean [SD] age, 47.3 [10.7] years [median, 44; range, 34-73 years]) the mean (SD) total ophthalmologist examination time was 11.2 (6.3) minutes per patient, of which 3.0 (1.8) minutes (27% of the examination time) were spent on EHR use, 4.7 (4.2) minutes (42%) on conversation, and 3.5 (2.3) minutes (31%) on examination. Mean (SD) total ophthalmologist time spent using the EHR was 10.8 (5.0) minutes per encounter (range, 5.8-28.6 minutes). The typical ophthalmologist spent 3.7 hours using the EHR for a full day of clinic: 2.1 hours during examinations and 1.6 hours outside the clinic session. Linear mixed effects models showed a positive association between EHR use and billing level and a negative association between EHR use per encounter and clinic volume. Each additional encounter per clinic was associated with a decrease of 1.7 minutes (95% CI, -4.3 to 1.0) of EHR use time per encounter for ophthalmologists with high mean billing levels (adjusted R2 = 0.42; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Ophthalmologists have limited time with patients during office visits, and EHR use requires a substantial portion of that time. There is variability in EHR use patterns among ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29049512      PMCID: PMC5710390          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  42 in total

Review 1.  A primer on aspects of cognition for medical informatics.

Authors:  V L Patel; J F Arocha; D R Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Christoph U Lehmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Benefits of using an electronic health record.

Authors:  Robin Hoover
Journal:  Nursing       Date:  2016-07

5.  Secondary Use of EHR Timestamp data: Validation and Application for Workflow Optimization.

Authors:  Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Leah Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

6.  Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.

Authors:  Blackford Middleton; Meryl Bloomrosen; Mark A Dente; Bill Hashmat; Ross Koppel; J Marc Overhage; Thomas H Payne; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte Weaver; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The map is not the territory: medical records and 21st century practice.

Authors:  Stephen A Martin; Christine A Sinsky
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prevalence of copied information by attendings and residents in critical care progress notes.

Authors:  J Daryl Thornton; Jesse D Schold; Lokesh Venkateshaiah; Bradley Lander
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Relationship Between Clerical Burden and Characteristics of the Electronic Environment With Physician Burnout and Professional Satisfaction.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Lotte N Dyrbye; Christine Sinsky; Omar Hasan; Daniel Satele; Jeff Sloan; Colin P West
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; Holly J Lanham; Kim Batchelor; Lipika Samal; Brett Moran; Temple Howell-Stampley; Lynne Kirk; Manjula Cherukuri; Noel Santini; Luci K Leykum; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  28 in total

1.  Promoting Quality Face-to-Face Communication during Ophthalmology Encounters in the Electronic Health Record Era.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Helena E Gali; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Robert El-Kareh; Abigail E Huang; Heather E Chen; Andrew S Camp; Don O Kikkawa; Bobby S Korn; Jeffrey E Lee; Christopher A Longhurst; Marlene Millen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Analysis of Total Time Requirements of Electronic Health Record Use by Ophthalmologists Using Secondary EHR Data.

Authors:  Isaac H Goldstein; Michelle R Hribar; Leah G Reznick; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  Response to Letter: Secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical workflow analysis.

Authors:  Michelle R Hribar; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Using electronic health record audit logs to study clinical activity: a systematic review of aims, measures, and methods.

Authors:  Adam Rule; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Patient Record Review During Outpatient Ophthalmology Visits.

Authors:  Michelle R Hribar; David Biermann; Isaac H Goldstein; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

6.  Secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical workflow analysis.

Authors:  Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Isaac H Goldstein; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Surgical Intervention in Glaucoma Using Systemic Data From Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Charles Marks; Tsung-Ting Kuo; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Electronic Health Records in Ophthalmology: Source and Method of Documentation.

Authors:  Bradley S Henriksen; Isaac H Goldstein; Adam Rule; Abigail E Huang; Haley Dusek; Austin Igelman; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Integrating Patient Education Into the Glaucoma Clinical Encounter: A Lean Analysis.

Authors:  Paula A Newman-Casey; John A Musser; Leslie M Niziol; Michele M Heisler; Shivani S Kamat; Manjool M Shah; Nish Patel; Amy M Cohn
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Changes in Electronic Health Record Use Time and Documentation over the Course of a Decade.

Authors:  Isaac H Goldstein; Thomas Hwang; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Ryan Bales; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.