Literature DB >> 32072382

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).

Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis1, Evangelos Tagkalos1, Edin Hadzijusufovic1, Benjamin Babic1, Eren Uzun1, Richard van Hillegersberg2, Hauke Lang1,2, Peter Philipp Grimminger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis is gaining popularity as a treatment for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE procedures using the da Vinci Xi robotic system 4-arm technique.
METHODS: Data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) definitions.
RESULTS: Mean duration was 416 min (±80); 70% of patients had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery. Pulmonary complications were observed in 17% of patients. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 8% of patients. Median ICU stay was 1 day and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 11 days. The 30-day mortality was 1%; 90-day mortality was 3%. A R0 resection was reached in 92% of patients with a median number of 29 dissected lymph nodes. All patients had at least 7 months of follow-up with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median overall survival was not reached yet.
CONCLUSION: RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis) for esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer was technically feasible and safe. Postoperative complications and short-term oncologic results were comparable to the highest international standards nowadays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Ivor Lewis; MIE; Minimally invasive; RAMIE

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32072382      PMCID: PMC7850999          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

Authors:  Donald E Low; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail E Darling; Xavier Benoit DʼJourno; S Michael Griffin; Arnulf H Hölscher; Wayne L Hofstetter; Blair A Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; John C Kucharczuk; Simon Ying Kit Law; Toni E Lerut; Nick Maynard; Manuel Pera; Jeffrey H Peters; C S Pramesh; John V Reynolds; B Mark Smithers; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  E Tagkalos; L Goense; M Hoppe-Lotichius; J P Ruurda; B Babic; E Hadzijusufovic; W Kneist; P C van der Sluis; H Lang; R van Hillegersberg; P P Grimminger
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy: Results From 312 Cases.

Authors:  Pieter C van der Sluis; Jelle P Ruurda; Sylvia van der Horst; Lucas Goense; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  J Boone; M E I Schipper; W A Moojen; I H M Borel Rinkes; G J E Cromheecke; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development.

Authors:  Inderpal S Sarkaria; Nabil P Rizk; David J Finley; Manjit S Bains; Prasad S Adusumilli; James Huang; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pieter C van der Sluis; Sylvia van der Horst; Anne M May; Carlo Schippers; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Hans C A Joore; Christiaan C Kroese; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Stella Mook; Frank P Vleggaar; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Guillaume Piessen; Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  K W Maas; M A Cuesta; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J Roig; L Bonavina; C Rosman; S S Gisbertz; S S A Y Biere; D L van der Peet; J H Klinkenbijl; M W Hollmann; E S de Lange; H J Bonjer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chouliaras; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 2.  Esophagectomy-prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Stefano de Pascale
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 3.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stepan M Esagian; Ioannis A Ziogas; Konstantinos Skarentzos; Ioannis Katsaros; Georgios Tsoulfas; Daniela Molena; Michalis V Karamouzis; Ioannis Rouvelas; Magnus Nilsson; Dimitrios Schizas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Perioperative Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Duo Jiang; Xian-Ben Liu; Wen-Qun Xing; Shi-Lei Liu; Pei-Nan Chen; Peng Li; Ya-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Authors:  Jun Kanamori; Masayuki Watanabe; Suguru Maruyama; Yasukazu Kanie; Daisuke Fujiwara; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.540

Review 6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Adam J Bograd; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.815

7.  Risk of chyle leak after robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Aaron R Dezube; Suden Kucukak; Luis E De León; Kostas Kostopanagiotou; Michael T Jaklitsch; Jon O Wee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Change of strategy to minimally invasive esophagectomy-Results at a certified center].

Authors:  Felix Merboth; Jasmin Hasanovic; Daniel Stange; Marius Distler; Sandra Kaden; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-12-21

9.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy within the prospective multicenter German da Vinci Xi registry trial.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Thilo Welsch; Felix Merboth; Sandra Korn; Christian Praetorius; Daniel E Stange; Marius Distler; Matthias Biebl; Johann Pratschke; Felix Nickel; Beat Müller-Stich; Daniel Perez; Jakob R Izbicki; Thomas Becker; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  RAMIE: tradition drives innovation-feasibility of a robotic-assisted intra-thoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Simone Giacopuzzi; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Giovanni de Manzoni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.