Literature DB >> 34853881

Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Jun Kanamori1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Suguru Maruyama1, Yasukazu Kanie1, Daisuke Fujiwara1, Kei Sakamoto1, Akihiko Okamura1, Yu Imamura1.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer has been performed increasingly frequently over the last few years. Robotic systems with articulated devices and tremor filtration allow surgeons to perform such procedures more meticulously than by hand. The feasibility of RAMIE has been demonstrated in several retrospective comparative studies, which showed similar short-term outcomes to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (cMIE). Considering the number of harvested lymph nodes, RAMIE may be superior to cMIE in terms of left upper mediastinal lymph node dissection. However, whether or not the addition of a robotic system to cMIE can help improve perioperative and oncological outcomes remains unclear. Given the lack of established evidence from randomized controlled trials, we must await the results of ongoing studies to reach any meaningful conclusions. Further advancements in robotic platforms, as well as the reduction in medical expenses, will be essential to demonstrate the real benefit of RAMIE.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robot-assisted esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853881     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.540


  53 in total

1.  Ergonomics in the operating room: protecting the surgeon.

Authors:  Peter L Rosenblatt; Jessica McKinney; Sonia R Adams
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Shimi; S Banting
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1992-02

Review 3.  Robotic surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 4.  Ergonomics in Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Tatiana Catanzarite; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Emily L Whitcomb; Shawn Menefee
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; J Boone; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders; M J M M Giezeman; I H M Borel Rinkes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Philip W Chiu; Anthony Y Teoh; Vivien W Wong; Hon Chi Yip; Shannon M Chan; Simon K Wong; Enders K Ng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-10-25

7.  A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Yuko Kitagawa; Hideo Baba; Wataru Kimura; Naohiro Tomita; Tohru Nakagoe; Mitsuo Shimada; Kenichi Sugihara; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth; Jesper Lagergren; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Florian Lordick; Manish A Shah; Pernilla Lagergren; David Cunningham
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; M F J Seesing; H J F Brenkman; J P Ruurda
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence for nuclear medicine in oncology.

Authors:  Kenji Hirata; Hiroyuki Sugimori; Noriyuki Fujima; Takuya Toyonaga; Kohsuke Kudo
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy and pancreas-sparing duodenectomy avoid pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant tumours.

Authors:  Ronggui Lin; Xianchao Lin; Wuliang Wu; Congfei Wang; Fengchun Lu; Yuanyuan Yang; Haizong Fang; Yanchang Chen; Heguang Huang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.