Literature DB >> 34014498

Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique.

Konstantinos Chouliaras1, Steven Hochwald1, Moshim Kukar2.   

Abstract

Esophageal resection is a key component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is gaining widespread approval amongst few centers with promising early data. There is significant variability in the operative approach utilized by different centers and this review describes, step-by-step, the operative technique at a high-volume tertiary center. The cornerstone of management is individualized surgical approach, based on patient, tumor and technical factors. Although our approach is based on aforementioned factors, our preferred approach is an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and this review focuses on that. The procedure is broken down into three key parts, starting with an abdominal exploration and creation of the gastric conduit, placement of jejunostomy tube, moving to thoracic mobilization and creation of the side-side 6 cm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis with a final abdominal portion to assure proper positioning of the conduit and reducing redundancy. This approach is fully robotic and a side to side anastomosis facilitates the creation of a widely patent anastomosis therefore minimizing the risk of anastomotic leaks and strictures. Our experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy, as has been previously published, is associated with a 5.1% of anastomotic leak and 7.6% of anastomotic stricture. The robotic platform further optimizes this technique and helps us safely accomplish a side to side stapled anastomosis. Superior instrument dexterity in a restricted thoracic space is facilitated by intracorporeal suturing and robotic stapling. Thus, it obviates the need for a larger thoracotomy incision, which is typically needed for an EEA anastomosis, and that is traditionally associated with higher stricture rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robotic-assisted

Year:  2021        PMID: 34014498     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01000-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  4 in total

1.  Undertreatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Surgical Pathology.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Olecki; Kelly Stahl; June S Peng; Matthew Dixon; Niraj J Gusani; Chan Shen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  L Haverkamp; M F J Seesing; J P Ruurda; J Boone; R V Hillegersberg
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.

Authors:  Moshim Kukar; Kfir Ben-David; June S Peng; Kristopher Attwood; Ryan M Thomas; Mark Hennon; Chukwumere Nwogu; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).

Authors:  Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis; Evangelos Tagkalos; Edin Hadzijusufovic; Benjamin Babic; Eren Uzun; Richard van Hillegersberg; Hauke Lang; Peter Philipp Grimminger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.