Sarah Osterman1, Virginia B Gray1, Michelle Loy2, Alaina B Coffey1, Kelly Smallwood1, Michelle T Barrack3. 1. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA. 2. Division of Natural Sciences, Fullerton College, Fullerton, CA. 3. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA. Electronic address: michelle.barrack@csulb.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dietary supplement information needs among collegiate athletes. METHODS: Three hundred seven (n = 154 male; n = 153 female) student athletes participating in a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I team completed a dietary supplement survey. Qualitative coding addressed open-ended responses, and chi-square test of independence explored differences among athlete subgroups. RESULTS: Five themes representing athletes' information needs included quality/composition (53.5%; n = 77), general information (31.9%; n = 46), nutrition information (30.6%; n = 44), performance (18.8%; n = 27), and body composition (13.2%; n = 19). Athletes with "no" or "minimal" (n = 63), vs "moderate" or "strong" (n = 195), perceived knowledge of supplement safety were more likely to list a question about supplement quality or composition (34.9% [n = 22/63] vs 21.5% [n= 42/195]; P = .03; chi-square = 4.6). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Further research is needed to corroborate findings to inform educational efforts and promote safe and effective use of dietary supplements by student athletes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dietary supplement information needs among collegiate athletes. METHODS: Three hundred seven (n = 154 male; n = 153 female) student athletes participating in a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I team completed a dietary supplement survey. Qualitative coding addressed open-ended responses, and chi-square test of independence explored differences among athlete subgroups. RESULTS: Five themes representing athletes' information needs included quality/composition (53.5%; n = 77), general information (31.9%; n = 46), nutrition information (30.6%; n = 44), performance (18.8%; n = 27), and body composition (13.2%; n = 19). Athletes with "no" or "minimal" (n = 63), vs "moderate" or "strong" (n = 195), perceived knowledge of supplement safety were more likely to list a question about supplement quality or composition (34.9% [n = 22/63] vs 21.5% [n= 42/195]; P = .03; chi-square = 4.6). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Further research is needed to corroborate findings to inform educational efforts and promote safe and effective use of dietary supplements by student athletes.
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Jaime J Gahche; Cindy V Lentino; Johanna T Dwyer; Jody S Engel; Paul R Thomas; Joseph M Betz; Christopher T Sempos; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Harris R Lieberman; Bernadette P Marriott; Christianna Williams; Daniel A Judelson; Ellen L Glickman; Paula J Geiselman; Laura Dotson; Caroline R Mahoney Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Ronald J Maughan; Louise M Burke; Jiri Dvorak; D Enette Larson-Meyer; Peter Peeling; Stuart M Phillips; Eric S Rawson; Neil P Walsh; Ina Garthe; Hans Geyer; Romain Meeusen; Luc van Loon; Susan M Shirreffs; Lawrence L Spriet; Mark Stuart; Alan Vernec; Kevin Currell; Vidya M Ali; Richard G M Budgett; Arne Ljungqvist; Margo Mountjoy; Yannis Pitsiladis; Torbjørn Soligard; Uğur Erdener; Lars Engebretsen Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Aaron J Riviere; Rae Leach; Haleigh Mann; Samuel Robinson; Donna O Burnett; Jeganathan R Babu; Andrew Dandridge Frugé Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 5.717