| Literature DB >> 32054437 |
Ana Filipa Moutinho1,2,3, Nina Serén4,5,6, Joana Paupério4, Teresa Luísa Silva4,7, Fernando Martínez-Freiría4, Graciela Sotelo4, Rui Faria4, Tapio Mappes6, Paulo Célio Alves4,5, José Carlos Brito4,5, Zbyszek Boratyński8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Climatic variation and geologic change both play significant roles in shaping species distributions, thus affecting their evolutionary history. In Sahara-Sahel, climatic oscillations shifted the desert extent during the Pliocene-Pleistocene interval, triggering the diversification of several species. Here, we investigated how these biogeographical and ecological events have shaped patterns of genetic diversity and divergence in African Jerboas, desert specialist rodents. We focused on two sister and cryptic species, Jaculus jaculus and J. hirtipes, where we (1) evaluated their genetic differentiation, (2) reconstructed their evolutionary and demographic history; (3) tested the level of gene flow between them, and (4) assessed their ecological niche divergence.Entities:
Keywords: African jerboas; Cryptic diversity; Demographic history; Deserts; Jaculus; Local adaptation; Phylogenetics; Reproductive isolation; Sahara-Sahel; Speciation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32054437 PMCID: PMC7020373 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-1592-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationship of Jaculus individuals and their geographic distribution across North Africa. a Phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian inference showing the relationship among the haplotypes of two Jaculus species for the cytb gene (n = 231; 170 haplotypes). Values on branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities support and bootstrap values of Maximum-Likelihood analysis, respectively. White circles indicate posterior probabilities and bootstrap values above 0.91/91, respectively, for internal nodes. On each clade, the respective species is indicated. J. orientalis (n = 7; 2 haplotypes) was used as outgroup. Each tip of the tree branches is coloured according to the country of origin of each individual belonging to a haplotype. b Geographical locations of all Jaculus individuals used in this study. Red (circles) and green (triangles) samples denote, respectively, J. jaculus and J. hirtipes
Fig. 2Statistical parsimony haplotype networks of cytb, X-chromosome intron (DBX5), and nuclear autosomal genes (ADRA2B, IRBP, GHR, ƲWF, MC1R and Agouti) of the Jaculus specimens successfully amplified with nuclear markers (n = 152 for cytb; the number of sequences used for each nuclear locus is specified in Table 2). Each circle represents one haplotype and the circle area is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype. Absolute frequencies are indicated for more common haplotypes. The size of the branches is proportional to the number of nucleotide differences between haplotypes, and dots on branches specify mutational steps where each node represents a single base difference. The insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels) of DBX5 and Agouti were coded as single mutations (see Additional file 1: Figure S1) and so the sizes of the indels are indicated on the respective mutational step. Due to the large number of mutational steps of DBX5, the number of mutational steps is indicated [12]. The same was performed for cytb. Haplotypes in the cytb network were coloured as in Fig. 1a to indicate that the field samples were collected in Mauritania, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia. The dashed lines represent the alternative relationships between haplotypes. Nuclear haplotypes are coloured according to the respective mitochondrial lineage: J. jaculus (in red) and J. hirtipes (in green) as in Fig. 1b
Diversity estimates within Jaculus species
| Locus | Species | L | n | S | H | Hd(SD) | π (SD)% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 897 | 96 | 156 | 87 | 0.997 (0.002) | 1.61 (0.09) | 3.39 (0.86) | −1.84** | −89.13*** | 0.04** | ||
| 897 | 137 | 102 | 83 | 0.980 (0.005) | 0.58 (0.03) | 2.07 (0.51) | −2.35*** | − 107.96*** | 0.02*** | ||
| 311 | 84 | 3 | 4 | 0.220 (0.059) | 0.09 (0.03) | 0.20 (0.10) | −1.02 | −1.96 | 0.04 | ||
| 306 | 180 | 7 | 8 | 0.208 (0.040) | 0.07 (0.01) | 0.40 (0.20) | −1.77* | −8.94*** | 0.02 | ||
| 301 | 84 | 2 | 3 | 0.217 (0.057) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.10 (0.10) | −0.71 | −0.95 | 0.06 | ||
| 296 | 171 | 6 | 7 | 0.166 (0.038) | 0.06 (0.01) | 0.40 (0.20) | −1.73 | −8.21*** | 0.02 | ||
| 693 | 72 | 7 | 9 | 0.705 (0.031) | 0.30 (0.02) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.32 | −0.87 | 0.13 | ||
| 693 | 180 | 11 | 11 | 0.345 (0.045) | 0.06 (0.01) | 0.30 (0.10) | −1.85* | −9.67* | 0.02 | ||
| 798 | 80 | 10 | 11 | 0.378 (0.070) | 0.05 (0.01) | 0.20 (0.10) | −2.09* | −12.09** | 0.03* | ||
| 798 | 183 | 11 | 10 | 0.147 (0.036) | 0.03 (0.008) | 0.20 (0.09) | −2.12* | −12.93*** | 0.02* | ||
| 1058 | 50 | 25 | 19 | 0.905 (0.023) | 0.35 (0.05) | 0.53 (0.20) | −1.07 | −6.48 | 0.07* | ||
| 1058 | 106 | 23 | 35 | 0.948 (0.010) | 0.39 (0.002) | 0.41 (0.13) | −0.19 | −19.37 | 0.09 | ||
| 873 | 40 | 31 | 23 | 0.938 (0.026) | 0.57 (0.07) | 0.83 (0.28) | −1.11 | −10.77 | 0.08* | ||
| 874 | 132 | 33 | 37 | 0.933 (0.012) | 0.56 (0.02) | 0.69 (0.20) | −0.70 | −15.72 | 0.07 | ||
| 516 | 26 | 6 | 6 | 0.717 (0.079) | 0.38 (0.05) | 0.30 (0.15) | 0.76 | 0.14 | 0.16 | ||
| 514 | 127 | 18 | 14 | 0.861 (0.016) | 0.44 (0.27) | 0.65 (0.21) | −0.89 | −2.48 | 0.06 | ||
| 453 | 66 | 14 | 12 | 0.746 (0.037) | 0.39 (0.05) | 0.65 (0.24) | −0.06 | − 0.06* | 0.10*** | ||
| 461 | 162 | 14 | 15 | 0.765 (0.021) | 1.07 (0.02) | 0.54 (0.18) | −0.09* | −0.36 | 0.08*** | ||
| 894 | 56 | 9 | 11 | 0.890 (0.016) | 0.19 (0.01) | 0.22 (0.09) | −0.06 | −0.08 | 0.11 | ||
| 894 | 110 | 13 | 19 | 0.890 (0.019) | 0.25 (0.02) | 0.28 (0.10) | −0.06 | −0.21* | 0.09 |
In loci with significant levels of within-locus recombination, values are shown for the recombinant and non-recombinant datasets (denoted as “non-rec’”)
L number of sites excluding gaps, n number of sequences, S number of segregating sites, H number of haplotypes, Hd haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity per site, θ computed from the number of segregating sites, D Tajima’s D, F Fu’s F, R2 Ramos-Onsins & Rozas’s R2
Significant values indicated *(P < 0.05), **(P < 0.01), ***(P < 0.001)
Fig. 3*BEAST species tree inference output for cytb and the seven single copy nuclear DNA loci analysed. The posterior probability of each split is shown on each node and grey bars display the 95% highest posterior density intervals for the estimated split times between the two lineages and Jaculus sp. – J. orientalis, by applying a cytb mutation rate of 0.176 (divergence estimates are presented below bars). Branch lengths are proportional to time according to the mutation rate used for cytb
Average genetic divergence (Dxy) and net nucleotide divergence (Da) between J. jaculus and J. hirtipes, between J. jaculus-J. hirtipes and J. orientalis, and other related rodent species
| Locus | Other rodents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dxy | 10.00 (1.00) | 12.00 (1.00) | 12.00 (1.10) | 12.00 (1.00) | 12.50 (0.90)b 7.80 (0.80)c |
| Da | 8.80 (0.90) | 10.80 (1.00) | 11.40 (1.00) | 9.00 (0.80) | – |
| Dxy | 3.00 (0.90) | 0.40 (0.30) | 3.30 (1.00) | 2.40 (0.70) | 1.10 (0.60)d |
| Da | 3.00 (0.90) | 0.30 (0.30) | 3.30 (1.00) | 1.70 (0.50) | – |
| Dxy | 0.50 (0.20) | 1.10 (0.30) | 0.70 (0.20) | 0.80 (0.20) | 2.70 (0.50)e |
| Da | 0.30 (0.20) | 0.60 (0.20) | 0.30 (0.20) | 0.40 (0.20) | – |
| Dxy | 0.20 (0.10) | 0.80 (0.20) | 0.60 (0.20) | 0.70 (0.20) | 0.40 (0.20)f |
| Da | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.50 (0.20) | 0.30 (0.20) | 0.30 (0.20) | – |
| Dxy | 0.80 (0.20) | 0.80 (0.20) | 0.60 (0.20) | 0.70 (0.20) | 0.50 (0.20)g |
| Da | 0.40 (0.10) | 0.60 (0.20) | 0.40 (0.20) | 0.40 (0.10) | – |
| Dxy | 1.30 (0.30) | 3.00 (0.50) | 3.30 (0.50) | 3.30 (0.50) | 1.40 (0.30)h |
| Da | 0.80 (0.20) | 2.60 (0.50) | 2.80 (0.50) | 2.60 (0.50) | – |
| Dxy | 1.90 (0.50) | 1.60 (0.40) | 1.60 (0.50) | 1.80 (0.50) | 0.70 (0.40)i |
| Da | 0.90 (0.30) | 1.30 (0.50) | 1.20 (0.40) | 1.00 (0.40) | – |
| Dxy | 0.80 (0.20) | 1.30 (0.40) | 1.60 (0.40) | 1.50 (0.40) | 0.90 (0.30)j |
| Da | 0.50 (0.20) | 1.10 (0.30) | 1.40 (0.40) | 1.20 (0.30) | – |
The standard errors (in parenthesis) are based on 10,000 bootstrap replicates of the p-parameter; all estimates are given as percentages
Dxy Average number of nucleotide substitutions per site between populations (average raw DNA divergence), Da Number of net nucleotide substitutions per site between populations (average net DNA divergence)
aValues obtained after removing the regions with significant within-locus recombination
bMicrotus arvalis (GQ352469) / Microtus agrestis (GQ352470) [28]
cMicrotus arvalis (AY513809) / Microtus kirgisorum (AY513809) ([29, 30]; respectively)
dMicrotus arvalis (JX284377) / Microtus agrestis (JX284376) [31]
eAcomys russatus (FM162045) / Acomys cahirinus (FN984740) ([32, 33]; respectively)
fAllactaga bullata (JQ347909) / Allactaga balikunica (KM397227) ([34, 35]; respectively)
gAllactaga bullata (JQ347929) / Allactaga balikunica (KM397136) ([34, 35]; respectively)
hMicrotus agrestis (FM200055) / Microtus socialis (FM162067) ([32, 36]; respectively)
iPeromyscus polionotus (DQ482897) / Peromyscus maniculatus (DQ482892) [37]
jPeromyscus polionotus (EU020068) / Peromyscus maniculatus (EU020066) [38]
Fig. 4Extended Bayesian Skyline plots (EBSP) of the effective population size through time obtained from the three MCMC simulations for a J. jaculus and b J. hirtipes. Dashed black line is the median effective population size N in millions, multiplied by one (mean generation time in years). Solid black lines are the 95% highest posterior density limits. The y-axis is displayed on a log scale for simplicity
Fig. 5Structure bar plot of Bayesian assignments of individual to the respective cluster (K = 2). Vertical bars indicate individuals and the colours within each bar correspond to the probability of membership of each specimen to a cluster (in red – J. jaculus; in green – J. hirtipes)
Mean heterozygosity (observed and expected) and F-statistics for J. jaculus and J. hirtipes based on microsatellite loci
| Cluster | N | Na | Ne | Ho | He | uHe | FIS | FIT | FST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SE) | 42 | 12.83 (1.38) | 5.74 (0.81) | 0.80 (0.03) | 0.81 (0.03) | 0.82 (0.03) | – | – | – |
| Mean (SE) | 90 | 12.83 (2.44) | 5.86 (1.39) | 0.69 (0.13) | 0.70 (0.14) | 0.71 (0.14) | – | – | – |
| Total | |||||||||
| Mean (SE) | 132 | 12.83 (1.34) | 5.80 (0.78) | 0.75 (0.07) | 0.76 (0.07) | 0.76 (0.07) | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.18* (0.03) | 0.16* (0.03) |
SE Standard error, N Sample Size, Na Number of Alleles, Ne Number of Effective Alleles, Ho Observed Heterozygosity, He Expected Heterozygosity, Uhe Unbiased Expected Heterozygosity, F Inbreeding Coefficient, F Total Fixation Index, F Fixation Index
Significant values indicated *(P < 0.5)