| Literature DB >> 32053967 |
Ruisong Tao1,2, Chang Xu1, Yunliang Wang1, Xiaoyan Sun2, Chunxiang Li3, Junye Ma3, Jiasheng Hao1, Qun Yang3,4.
Abstract
The Apollo butterfly, Parnassius glacialis, is one of the most charming members of its genus and includes two subspecies locally distributed in montane areas of south-central China and Japan. In this study, we investigated the genetic structure and demographic history of P. glacialis by analyzing partial sequences of four mitochondrial genes and nuclear single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) via genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) of samples from nearly the entire known distributional range in China. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data demonstrated that a total of 39 haplotypes were present, and the species was estimated to have diverged about 0.95 million years ago during the middle Pleistocene transition into two main clades that likely formed during the Kunlun-Huanghe tectonic movement. The two clades then dispersed independently in distinct geographic areas alongside the mountainous routes in central and southern China, most likely driven by the Pleistocene glacial-interglacial cycles. Nuclear SNP analysis was generally congruent with mtDNA results at the individual level. A minor incongruence of genetic structures that was detected between mtDNA and nuclear SNP data from the Laojunshan and Tiantangzhai populations was likely due to secondary contact and male-biased dispersal. Our work demonstrates that complicated dispersal-vicariance evolutionary processes likely led to the current geographic distribution of P. glacialis in China, particularly the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and related climatic oscillations during the Quaternary period.Entities:
Keywords: Parnassius; Parnassius glacialis; divergence time estimation; phylogeny; phylogeography; quaternary climatic oscillations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32053967 PMCID: PMC7073557 DOI: 10.3390/genes11020188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
P. glacialis population genetic parameters and sample data. (N, Sample size subjected to mtDNA/SNP examination; “H”, for mtDNA haplotype; Clade A/B as shown in Figure 3).
| Population | Code | N | Geographic Coordinates | Altitude (m) | Clade | Haplotypes (No. of Individuals) | Haplotype Diversity ( | Nucleotide Diversity ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zijinshan, Jiangsu Prov. | ZJS | 30/10 | E118.83, N32.06 | 314 | B | H1(19), H2(2), H3(5), H4(4) | 0.568 | 0.00027 |
| 2 | Yuntaishan, Jiangsu Prov. | YTS | 30/10 | E119.40, N34.71 | 345 | A | H5(30) | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Tiantangzhai, Anhui Prov. | TTZ | 28/10 | E115.77, N31.17 | 615 | B | H6(24), H7(4) | 0.254 | 0.00008 |
| 4 | Huangbaiyuan, Shaanxi Prov. | HBY | 30/10 | E107.40, N33.73 | 1360 | A | H8(2), H9(18), H10(6), H11(2), H35(1), H36(1) | 0.609 | 0.00026 |
| 5 | Laojunshan, Henan Prov. | LJS | 30/10 | E111.66, N33.76 | 861 | A/B | H12(3), H13(1), H14(4), H15(14), H16(4), H17(2), H38(1), H39(1) | 0.754 | 0.00188 |
| 6 | Tianmushan, Zhejiang Prov. | TMS | 26/10 | E119.45, N30.34 | 536 | B | H18(13), H19(13) | 0.520 | 0.00052 |
| 7 | Taishan, Shandong Prov. | TS | 28/10 | E117.12, N36.25 | 685 | A | H20(5), H21(7), H22(16) | 0.601 | 0.00023 |
| 8 | Xiaolongshan, Gansu Prov. | XLS | 29/10 | E105.68, N34.85 | 1420 | A | H9(19), H10(9), H11(1) | 0.490 | 0.00017 |
| 9 | Langyashan, Anhui Prov. | LYS | 26/10 | E118.29, N32.28 | 270 | B | H2(2), H3(3), H4(5), H23(16) | 0.588 | 0.00057 |
| 10 | Niutoushan, Hubei Prov. | NTS | 29/10 | E110.73, N32.60 | 680 | A | H24(5), H25(2), H13(21), H37(1) | 0.456 | 0.00064 |
| 11 | Kunyushan, Shandong Prov. | KYS | 30/10 | E121.73, N37.28 | 290 | A | H26(10), H27(20) | 0.460 | 0.00015 |
| 12 | Shennongjia, Hubei Prov. | SNJ | 26/10 | E110.35, N31.52 | 1820 | A | H9(1), H28(4), H29(11), H30(8), H31(2) | 0.723 | 0.00043 |
| 13 | Songshan, Henan Prov. | SS | 26/9 | E113.05, N34.48 | 716 | A | H32(24), H33(1), H34(1) | 0.151 | 0.00007 |
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the 13 sampled populations of Parnassius glacialis. Populations are represented by pie charts with slice size proportional to the frequency of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype clades (see text for explanation). Pie chart size corresponds to the clades in Table 1.
Figure 2Estimated time tree of Parnassius based on mitochondrial sequences in relation to geological and climatic events from the Oligocene epoch to the present. (a) Divergence time estimated from BEAST analysis, with relevant geological events (blue shades), 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals (boxes) and calibration points (*). Numbers above branches represent Bayesian posterior probability (PP); (b) global climate curve, from Zachos et al. [66].
Figure 3Bayesian phylogenetic tree (left) and median-joining network (right) based on mtDNA haplotypes of P. glacialis. Haplotype frequency denoted by circle size, black dots represent corresponding mutation steps, and open circles indicate undetected haplotypes.
Nei’s genetic distance (below diagonal) and geographic distance (above diagonal, km) between geographic populations of P. glacialis.
| Geographic Population | ZJS | YTS | TTZ | HBY | LJS | TMS | TS | XLS | LYS | NTS | KYS | SNJ | SS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZJS | 299.38 | 302.38 | 1082.6 | 695.33 | 200.14 | 491.73 | 1257.7 | 56.41 | 761.46 | 638.06 | 803.52 | 601.30 | |
| YTS | 0.245 | 514.84 | 1027.7 | 719.14 | 485.95 | 268.21 | 1252.2 | 289.14 | 833.26 | 354.38 | 914.00 | 581.63 | |
| TTZ | 0.084 | 0.209 | 836.45 | 481.42 | 361.58 | 574.63 | 1026.4 | 264.31 | 502.08 | 868.02 | 518.65 | 446.98 | |
| HBY | 0.333 | 0.156 | 0.277 | 393.87 | 1195.9 | 928.24 | 201.19 | 1027.7 | 335.31 | 1354.3 | 369.71 | 526.92 | |
| LJS | 0.210 | 0.131 | 0.183 | 0.086 | 826.48 | 569.04 | 562.40 | 639.54 | 152.44 | 991.16 | 277.63 | 151.52 | |
| TMS | 0.052 | 0.259 | 0.113 | 0.379 | 0.245 | 691.85 | 1382.5 | 242.23 | 862.78 | 799.85 | 877.57 | 757.24 | |
| TS | 0.185 | 0.149 | 0.137 | 0.183 | 0.157 | 0.219 | 1046.0 | 454.34 | 709.80 | 426.27 | 816.40 | 417.66 | |
| XLS | 0.336 | 0.159 | 0.279 | 0.001 | 0.088 | 0.385 | 0.184 | 1201.9 | 530.26 | 1465.8 | 570.81 | 675.03 | |
| LYS | 0.035 | 0.288 | 0.138 | 0.398 | 0.274 | 0.070 | 0.247 | 0.399 | 708.36 | 638.48 | 754.12 | 544.95 | |
| NTS | 0.326 | 0.137 | 0.267 | 0.055 | 0.068 | 0.335 | 0.196 | 0.057 | 0.399 | 1125.9 | 127.99 | 297.74 | |
| KYS | 0.301 | 0.266 | 0.241 | 0.226 | 0.230 | 0.345 | 0.149 | 0.234 | 0.377 | 0.264 | 1223.5 | 840.85 | |
| SNJ | 0.400 | 0.203 | 0.332 | 0.040 | 0.100 | 0.434 | 0.231 | 0.042 | 0.484 | 0.058 | 0.162 | 415.24 | |
| SS | 0.290 | 0.253 | 0.231 | 0.086 | 0.120 | 0.334 | 0.207 | 0.087 | 0.365 | 0.143 | 0.256 | 0.125 |
Figure 4Scatter plot of Nei’s genetic distance vs. geographical distance (based on longitude and latitude coordinates) for P. glacialis populations (Mantel test).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for populations of P. glacialis based on data from four mtDNA fragments.
| Source of Variation | Variance | % Total | Fixation Indices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 2.44966 | 46.37% | 0.0000 | |
| Among populations within groups | 1.99030 | 37.68% | 0.0000 | |
| Within populations | 0.84257 | 15.95% | 0.0016 |
Figure 5Demographic expansion models for two major clades of P. glacialis. (A) Mismatch distribution analyses for Clades A and B. The blue dotted and brown solid lines represent the observed and expected mismatch distributions of a stationary population, respectively; (B) Bayesian skyline plots for Clades A and B. The X-axis represents time (Ma) and the Y-axis is Ne × μ (effective population size × mutation rate per site per generation). Medians are shown as solid lines, and gray areas represent 95% HPD limits.
Mismatch distribution analysis and neutrality test results for Clades A and B.
| Mismatch Distribution Analysis | Neutrality Tests | τ | Expansion Time (Ma) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Tajima’s |
| Fu’s |
| |||
| Clade A | 0.04504 | 0.148 | 0.25367 | 0.316 | 0.43656 | 0.701 | −22.274 | 0.11 | 3.832 | - |
| Clade B | 0.03792 | 0.242 | 0.11609 | 0.566 | −1.39030 | 0.033 | −27.318 | 0.000 | 3.018 | 0.0434 |
Figure 6Marginal posterior probability distributions for substitution rate of P. glacialis mtDNA modeled by constant-size and Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) methods. Molecular dating was calibrated by assuming a time to Most Recent Common Ancestry of 0.95 Ma for P. glacialis.
Figure 7Population genetics analyses of P. glacialis based on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data. (a) Sampling sites in this study representing a total of 129 individuals from 13 populations; (b) Neighbor joining (NJ) tree constructed using p-distance between individuals representing 13 populations; (c) Principal Components 1 and 2 for all individuals; (d) population genetic structure based on genomic SNPs. Each vertical bar represents one individual, and the length of each colored segment indicates the proportion of the individual genome inferred from ancestral populations (K = 2–4).
Figure 8Chronogram and ancestral area reconstruction of Parnassius in China based on mtDNA. Ancestral area assignments at nodes represent marginal probabilities of alternative ancestral distributions obtained by statistical dispersal-vicariance analysis (S-DIVA). (A) Qinling Mountains-Huaihe River region; (B) area south of the Huaihe River; (C) northeast China; (D) Xinjiang; and (E) the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). Data from C and D were not included in this report.