Literature DB >> 15764559

Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models.

John Huelsenbeck1, Bruce Rannala.   

Abstract

What does the posterior probability of a phylogenetic tree mean?This simulation study shows that Bayesian posterior probabilities have the meaning that is typically ascribed to them; the posterior probability of a tree is the probability that the tree is correct, assuming that the model is correct. At the same time, the Bayesian method can be sensitive to model misspecification, and the sensitivity of the Bayesian method appears to be greater than the sensitivity of the nonparametric bootstrap method (using maximum likelihood to estimate trees). Although the estimates of phylogeny obtained by use of the method of maximum likelihood or the Bayesian method are likely to be similar, the assessment of the uncertainty of inferred trees via either bootstrapping (for maximum likelihood estimates) or posterior probabilities (for Bayesian estimates) is not likely to be the same. We suggest that the Bayesian method be implemented with the most complex models of those currently available, as this should reduce the chance that the method will concentrate too much probability on too few trees.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15764559     DOI: 10.1080/10635150490522629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  146 in total

1.  AFLPs do not support deep phylogenetic relationships among darters (Teleostei: Percidae: Etheostomatinae).

Authors:  T J Near; B P Keck
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang; Bruce Rannala
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  How little is known about "the little brown frogs": description of three new species of the genus Leptobrachella (Anura: Megophryidae) from Yunnan Province, China.

Authors:  Jin-Min Chen; Kai Xu; Nikolay A Poyarkov; Kai Wang; Zhi-Yong Yuan; Mian Hou; Chatmongkon Suwannapoom; Jian Wang; Jing Che
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-05-18

4.  Highly conserved caspase and Bcl-2 homologues from the sea anemone Aiptasia pallida: lower metazoans as models for the study of apoptosis evolution.

Authors:  Simon R Dunn; Wendy S Phillips; Joseph W Spatafora; Douglas R Green; Virginia M Weis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Mitochondrial DNA recombination in a free-ranging Australian lizard.

Authors:  Beata Ujvari; Mark Dowton; Thomas Madsen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches: case studies with diploblast LSU.

Authors:  Dirk Erpenbeck; Scott A Nichols; Oliver Voigt; Martin Dohrmann; Bernard M Degnan; John N A Hooper; Gert Wörheide
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Statistical measures of uncertainty for branches in phylogenetic trees inferred from molecular sequences by using model-based methods.

Authors:  Borys Wróbel
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fast phylogenetic DNA barcoding.

Authors:  Kasper Munch; Wouter Boomsma; Eske Willerslev; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Empirical evaluation of a prior for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Primate phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Luca Pozzi; Jason A Hodgson; Andrew S Burrell; Kirstin N Sterner; Ryan L Raaum; Todd R Disotell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.