| Literature DB >> 26923804 |
Zhen Ye1,2, Gengping Zhu3, Jakob Damgaard4, Xin Chen2, Pingping Chen5, Wenjun Bu2.
Abstract
Subtropical China is a centre of speciation and well known for its high biological diversity and endemism. To understand the impact of historical, geographical and ecological factors on the intraspecific lineage divergence of invertebrates, we examined these processes in a semiaquatic bug, Microvelia horvathi (Hemiptera: Veliidae). Three hypotheses were developed using ecological niche models (ENM). We tested these hypotheses using mitochondrial (COI + COII) and nuclear data (ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2). The phylogenic analysis revealed a shallow divergence in mitochondrial data. Clade I was mostly confined to the northern region and clade II was nearly restricted to the southern region. The historical process of Pleistocene climatic fluctuations during the LGM promoted divergence, along with such geographical barriers as the Wuyi, Nanling and Xuefeng mountains and ecological factors of temperature and vegetation type, contributed to these shallow genetic divergences and helped maintain them. The north-south population differentiation probably occurred during the transition from LIG to LGM, with post-LGM population expansion. The results of genetic data were mostly consistent with the spatial predictions from ENM. Our study emphasizes the multiple effects influencing genetic population differentiation, and also contributes to our knowledge of the phylogeography of other aquatic organisms in subtropical China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26923804 PMCID: PMC4770413 DOI: 10.1038/srep21932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sample size and halotype frequencies of two major clades of M. horvathi, designated clade I and II according to the molecular phylogeny in Fig. 3a.
Frequencies of clade I and II haplotypes in each population are showed by the pie graph. Names of mountain ranges in the map were labelled. Figure was generated in ArcGIS 10 (Environmental Systems Research Institute).
Figure 2Hindcasting the current niche model (left panel) onto the LIG (right panel) and LGM (middle panel) periods in East Asia using Maxent.
Niche model results were modified in ArcGIS 10 (Environmental Systems Research Institute).
Nucleotide polymorphism in each geographic population.
| COI + COII | Lat. | Long. | Sample size | Hap | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern populations | |||||||
| AHBB | 33°3′30″ | 117°10′41″ | 9 | 6 | 0.722 | 0.00095 | |
| AHYX | 31°3′34″ | 116°6′52″ | 10 | 6 | 0.667 | 0.00085 | |
| FJSW | 27°5′5″ | 117°16′25″ | 9 | 10 | 0.917 | 0.00225 | |
| GDBL | 23°19′10″ | 114°28′44″ | 9 | 16 | 0.972 | 0.00360 | |
| GXME | 25°51′27″ | 110°28′38″ | 5 | 10 | 0.900 | 0.00356 | |
| GZSY | 28°13′54″ | 107°9′38″ | 10 | 10 | 0.667 | 0.00195 | |
| GZYH | 28°38′16″ | 108°17′22″ | 10 | 12 | 0.844 | 0.00313 | |
| HNBB | 35°30′6″ | 113°25′41″ | 9 | 10 | 0.583 | 0.00170 | |
| HNXY | 31°48′8″ | 114°4′36″ | 8 | 4 | 0.464 | 0.00071 | |
| HBSN | 31°44′46″ | 110°39′38″ | 10 | 9 | 0.533 | 0.00128 | |
| HBWH | 30°32′25″ | 114°22′20″ | 9 | 6 | 0.583 | 0.00095 | |
| HNCS | 28°10′57″ | 113°4′59″ | 5 | 3 | 0.700 | 0.00085 | |
| HNZJ | 29°12′22″ | 110°26′44″ | 10 | 4 | 0.378 | 0.00057 | |
| JSXY | 34°11′42″ | 118°20′52″ | 9 | 10 | 0.722 | 0.00158 | |
| JXLN | 24°32′40″ | 114°27′53″ | 9 | 10 | 0.972 | 0.00265 | |
| JXML | 29°32′18″ | 117°39′10″ | 10 | 13 | 0.933 | 0.00196 | |
| JXSX | 26°53′21″ | 115°35′54″ | 10 | 9 | 0.667 | 0.00128 | |
| SDMY | 35°33′23″ | 117°58′19″ | 7 | 7 | 0.857 | 0.00169 | |
| ZJLA | 30°21′53″ | 119°28′41″ | 10 | 11 | 0.533 | 0.00168 | |
| ZJSC | 28°21′38″ | 118°53′9″ | 8 | 7 | 0.643 | 0.00125 | |
| ZJTS | 27°42′11″ | 119°38′55″ | 9 | 9 | 0.833 | 0.00261 | |
| Southern populations | |||||||
| FJYT | 25°52′42″ | 119°5′10″ | 4 | 8 | 1.000 | 0.00285 | |
| GDLZ | 20°53′59″ | 110°5′48″ | 9 | 12 | 0.972 | 0.00233 | |
| GDNJ | 22°14′56″ | 112°2′49″ | 6 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.00157 | |
| GXNG | 22°33′19″ | 106°48′21″ | 8 | 10 | 1.000 | 0.00241 | |
| GZML | 25°8′49″ | 107°52′54″ | 9 | 7 | 0.889 | 0.00154 | |
| HNMY | 18°55′35″ | 109°30′32″ | 2 | 2 | h48, | 1.000 | 0.00142 |
| TWGX | 22°54′41″ | 120°42′59″ | 8 | 6 | 0.893 | 0.00127 | |
| TWMN | 22°55′51″ | 120°35′23″ | 6 | 7 | 0.600 | 0.00180 | |
| YNBM | 24°3′32″ | 105°8′43″ | 10 | 6 | 0.844 | 0.00127 | |
| YNXC | 23°14′54″ | 104°28′43″ | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.00142 | |
S, number of segregating sites; Hap, haplotypes’ distribution; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity. Halotypes had been found in two or more localities; the number in brackets indicates how many times a haplotype was observed at a particular locality.
Figure 3(a) Phylogenetic NJ tree analyses of all ninety haloptypes based on mitochondrial markers (COI + COII). Branches of above 50% bootstrap support are showed in number. (b) The Neighbor-Net algorithm. Clade I and clade II are shown in blue (at the top) and green (at the bottom), respectively. (c) Historical demographic trends of the whole data represented by Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) based on mitochondrial data. X axis is the time scale before present. Y axis is the estimated effective population size. Estimates of means are joined by a solid line. LGM represents Last Glacial Maximum.
Figure 4Median joining haplotypes network constructed using Network.
Haplotype circle size denotes the number of sampled individuals. Numbers of base pair changes (no number = 1 bp) are given. (a) Based on mitochondrial data. (b) Based on nuclear data.
Figure 5Values of fixation indices (F) as a function of number of groups (K) based on mitochondrial data.
FCT is the differentiation between groups, FST is the differentiation between populations among groups, and FSC is the differentiation between populations within groups.
Nucleotide polymorphism and Neutrality tests in defined groups and whole dataset based on mitochondrial data.
| Parameter | Northern populations | Southern populations | Whole set |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 185 | 65 | 250 |
| 78 | 38 | 96 | |
| Nhap | 60 | 30 | 90 |
| 0.745 | 0.899 | 0.845 | |
| 0.00195 | 0.00182 | 0.00262 | |
| Tajima’s | −2.46357** | −2.23081** | −2.33707* |
| Fu’s Fs | −26.47381*** | −26.70583*** | −25.65535*** |
| Fu and Li’s | −7.88953** | −5.04140** | −8.81400** |
S, number of segregating sites; NHap, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.02; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6The results of the spatial evolutionary and ecological vicariance analysis (SEEVA) of M. horvathi using annual mean temperature (BIO1), min temperature of coldest month (BIO6) and vegetation type as four qualitative or quantitative section states.
The blue scale of the histograms represents the four different states. Vegetation: A, temperate deciduous forest; B, evergreen broad leaved forest; C, monsoon rain forest/evergreen broad leaved forest; D, island monsoon rain forest.