Literature DB >> 32049269

Effect of Reduced Exposure to Vasopressors on 90-Day Mortality in Older Critically Ill Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

François Lamontagne1,2, Alvin Richards-Belle3, Karen Thomas3, David A Harrison3, M Zia Sadique4, Richard D Grieve4, Julie Camsooksai5, Robert Darnell3, Anthony C Gordon6,7, Doreen Henry8, Nicholas Hudson3, Alexina J Mason4, Michelle Saull3, Chris Whitman8, J Duncan Young9, Kathryn M Rowan3, Paul R Mouncey3.   

Abstract

Importance: Vasopressors are commonly administered to intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise blood pressure. Balancing risks and benefits of vasopressors is a challenge, particularly in older patients. Objective: To determine whether reducing exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] target, 60-65 mm Hg) reduces mortality at 90 days in ICU patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 65 ICUs in the United Kingdom and included 2600 randomized patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension (assessed by treating clinician). The study was conducted from July 2017 to March 2019, and follow-up was completed in August 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to vasopressors guided either by MAP target (60-65 mm Hg, permissive hypotension) (n = 1291) or according to usual care (at the discretion of treating clinicians) (n = 1307). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.
Results: Of 2600 randomized patients, after removal of those who declined or had withdrawn consent, 2463 (95%) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (mean [SD] age 75 years [7 years]; 1387 [57%] men). Patients randomized to the permissive hypotension group had lower exposure to vasopressors compared with those in the usual care group (median duration 33 hours vs 38 hours; difference in medians, -5.0; 95% CI, -7.8 to -2.2 hours; total dose in norepinephrine equivalents median, 17.7 mg vs 26.4 mg; difference in medians, -8.7 mg; 95% CI, -12.8 to -4.6 mg). At 90 days, 500 of 1221 (41.0%) in the permissive hypotension compared with 544 of 1242 (43.8%) in the usual care group had died (absolute risk difference, -2.85%; 95% CI, -6.75 to 1.05; P = .15) (unadjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03). When adjusted for prespecified baseline variables, the odds ratio for 90-day mortality was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98). Serious adverse events were reported for 79 patients (6.2%) in the permissive care group and 75 patients (5.8%) in the usual care group. The most common serious adverse events were acute renal failure (41 [3.2%] vs 33 [2.5%]) and supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (12 [0.9%] vs 13 [1.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients 65 years or older receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension, permissive hypotension compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality at 90 days. However, the confidence interval around the point estimate for the primary outcome should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of the study. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN10580502.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32049269      PMCID: PMC7064880          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  40 in total

1.  Reduced exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension to reduce mortality in critically ill people aged 65 and over: the 65 RCT.

Authors:  Paul R Mouncey; Alvin Richards-Belle; Karen Thomas; David A Harrison; M Zia Sadique; Richard D Grieve; Julie Camsooksai; Robert Darnell; Anthony C Gordon; Doreen Henry; Nicholas Hudson; Alexina J Mason; Michelle Saull; Chris Whitman; J Duncan Young; François Lamontagne; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 3.  Clinical, molecular, and epidemiological characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Esteban Ortiz-Prado; Katherine Simbaña-Rivera; Lenin Gómez-Barreno; Mario Rubio-Neira; Linda P Guaman; Nikolaos C Kyriakidis; Claire Muslin; Ana María Gómez Jaramillo; Carlos Barba-Ostria; Doménica Cevallos-Robalino; Hugo Sanches-SanMiguel; Luis Unigarro; Rasa Zalakeviciute; Naomi Gadian; Andrés López-Cortés
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  Heterogeneous impact of hypotension on organ perfusion and outcomes: a narrative review.

Authors:  Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Eduardo Kattan; Djillali Annane; Ricardo Castro; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Arnaldo Dubin; Laura Evans; Michelle Ng Gong; Olfa Hamzaoui; Can Ince; Bruno Levy; Xavier Monnet; Gustavo A Ospina Tascón; Marlies Ostermann; Michael R Pinsky; James A Russell; Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent; Fernando G Zampieri; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.

Authors:  Laura Evans; Andrew Rhodes; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Craig M Coopersmith; Craig French; Flávia R Machado; Lauralyn Mcintyre; Marlies Ostermann; Hallie C Prescott; Christa Schorr; Steven Simpson; W Joost Wiersinga; Fayez Alshamsi; Derek C Angus; Yaseen Arabi; Luciano Azevedo; Richard Beale; Gregory Beilman; Emilie Belley-Cote; Lisa Burry; Maurizio Cecconi; John Centofanti; Angel Coz Yataco; Jan De Waele; R Phillip Dellinger; Kent Doi; Bin Du; Elisa Estenssoro; Ricard Ferrer; Charles Gomersall; Carol Hodgson; Morten Hylander Møller; Theodore Iwashyna; Shevin Jacob; Ruth Kleinpell; Michael Klompas; Younsuck Koh; Anand Kumar; Arthur Kwizera; Suzana Lobo; Henry Masur; Steven McGloughlin; Sangeeta Mehta; Yatin Mehta; Mervyn Mer; Mark Nunnally; Simon Oczkowski; Tiffany Osborn; Elizabeth Papathanassoglou; Anders Perner; Michael Puskarich; Jason Roberts; William Schweickert; Maureen Seckel; Jonathan Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Tobias Welte; Janice Zimmerman; Mitchell Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Fluid Resuscitation and Vasopressor Therapy Research Priorities in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.296

8.  Use of Vasoactive Medications after Cardiac Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Emily A Vail; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Hayley B Gershengorn; Allan J Walkey; Peter K Lindenauer; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-01

9.  Pulse pressure during the initial resuscitative period in patients with septic shock treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Youn-Jung Kim; Gi Na Yu; Jae Cheon Jeon; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 10.  Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: an updated review on pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Peter Pickkers; Michael Darmon; Eric Hoste; Michael Joannidis; Matthieu Legrand; Marlies Ostermann; John R Prowle; Antoine Schneider; Miet Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.