| Literature DB >> 34910228 |
Jan Bakker1,2,3,4, Eduardo Kattan4, Djillali Annane5,6, Ricardo Castro4, Maurizio Cecconi7,8, Daniel De Backer9, Arnaldo Dubin10,11, Laura Evans12, Michelle Ng Gong13, Olfa Hamzaoui14, Can Ince1, Bruno Levy15,16,17, Xavier Monnet18, Gustavo A Ospina Tascón19, Marlies Ostermann20, Michael R Pinsky21, James A Russell22, Bernd Saugel23, Thomas W L Scheeren24, Jean-Louis Teboul25, Antoine Vieillard Baron26,27, Jean-Louis Vincent28, Fernando G Zampieri29,30, Glenn Hernandez31.
Abstract
Clinical and pathophysiological understanding of septic shock has progressed exponentially in the previous decades, translating into a steady decrease in septic shock-related morbidity and mortality. Even though large randomized, controlled trials have addressed fundamental aspects of septic shock resuscitation, many questions still exist. In this review, we will describe the current standards of septic shock resuscitation, but the emphasis will be placed on evolving concepts in different domains such as clinical resuscitation targets, adequate use of fluids and vasoactive drugs, refractory shock, and the use of extracorporeal therapies. Multiple research opportunities remain open, and collaborative endeavors should be performed to fill in these gaps.Entities:
Keywords: Fluid resuscitation; Fluids; Intensive care; Sepsis; Treatment; Vasoactive drugs
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34910228 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06595-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440