Literature DB >> 32043131

Predicting sleep apnea responses to oral appliance therapy using polysomnographic airflow.

Daniel Vena1, Ali Azarbarzin1, Melania Marques1,2, Sara Op de Beeck3,4,5, Olivier M Vanderveken3,4,5, Bradley A Edwards6, Nicole Calianese1, Lauren B Hess1, Reza Radmand1, Garun S Hamilton7,8, Simon A Joosten7,8, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro1, Sang-Wook Kim1,9, Johan Verbraecken3,5, Marc Braem3,10, David P White1, Scott A Sands1, Andrew Wellman1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Oral appliance therapy is an increasingly common option for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients who are intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Clinically applicable tools to identify patients who could respond to oral appliance therapy are limited.
METHODS: Data from three studies (N = 81) were compiled, which included two sleep study nights, on and off oral appliance treatment. Along with clinical variables, airflow features were computed that included the average drop in airflow during respiratory events (event depth) and flow shape features, which, from previous work, indicates the mechanism of pharyngeal collapse. A model was developed to predict oral appliance treatment response (>50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] from baseline plus a treatment AHI <10 events/h). Model performance was quantified using (1) accuracy and (2) the difference in oral appliance treatment efficacy (percent reduction in AHI) and treatment AHI between predicted responders and nonresponders.
RESULTS: In addition to age and body mass index (BMI), event depth and expiratory "pinching" (validated to reflect palatal prolapse) were the airflow features selected by the model. Nonresponders had deeper events, "pinched" expiratory flow shape (i.e. associated with palatal collapse), were older, and had a higher BMI. Prediction accuracy was 74% and treatment AHI was lower in predicted responders compared to nonresponders by a clinically meaningful margin (8.0 [5.1 to 11.6] vs. 20.0 [12.2 to 29.5] events/h, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A model developed with airflow features calculated from routine polysomnography, combined with age and BMI, identified oral appliance treatment responders from nonresponders. This research represents an important application of phenotyping to identify alternative treatments for personalized OSA management. © Sleep Research Society 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OSA; oral appliance therapy; upper airway

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043131      PMCID: PMC7355408          DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  37 in total

1.  Cephalometry and prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Tze Ming Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Upper airway collapsibility in snorers and in patients with obstructive hypopnea and apnea.

Authors:  I C Gleadhill; A R Schwartz; N Schubert; R A Wise; S Permutt; P L Smith
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-06

3.  Supine Cephalometric Analyses of an Adjustable Oral Appliance Used in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Yuehua Liu; Young-Chel Park; Alan A. Lowe; John A. Fleetham
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  The effect of positional dependency on outcomes of treatment with a mandibular advancement device.

Authors:  Chul-Hee Lee; Hahn Jin Jung; Woo Hyun Lee; Chae Seo Rhee; In-Young Yoon; Pil-Young Yun; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Optimal positive airway pressure predicts oral appliance response to sleep apnoea.

Authors:  S Tsuiki; M Kobayashi; K Namba; Y Oka; Y Komada; T Kagimura; Y Inoue
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  Objectively measured vs self-reported compliance during oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Marijke Dieltjens; Marc J Braem; Anneclaire V M T Vroegop; Kristien Wouters; Johan A Verbraecken; Wilfried A De Backer; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Craniofacial morphologic predictors of oral appliance outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hsin-Lan Shen; Yu-Wen Wen; Ning-Hung Chen; Yu-Fang Liao
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Structure and severity of pharyngeal obstruction determine oral appliance efficacy in sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Melania Marques; Pedro R Genta; Ali Azarbarzin; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ludovico Messineo; Lauren B Hess; Gail Demko; David P White; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Remotely controlled mandibular protrusion during sleep predicts therapeutic success with oral appliances in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  John Remmers; Shouresh Charkhandeh; Joshua Grosse; Zbigniew Topor; Rollin Brant; Peter Santosham; Sabina Bruehlmann
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Airflow Shape Is Associated With the Pharyngeal Structure Causing OSA.

Authors:  Pedro R Genta; Scott A Sands; James P Butler; Stephen H Loring; Eliot S Katz; B Gail Demko; Eric J Kezirian; David P White; Andrew Wellman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mandibular Advancement Splint Therapy.

Authors:  Anna M Mohammadieh; Kate Sutherland; Andrew S L Chan; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  The impact of daytime transoral neuromuscular stimulation on upper airway physiology - A mechanistic clinical investigation.

Authors:  Brandon Nokes; Christopher N Schmickl; Rebbecca Brena; Nana Naa-Oye Bosompra; Dillon Gilbertson; Scott A Sands; Rakesh Bhattacharjee; Dwayne L Mann; Robert L Owens; Atul Malhotra; Jeremy E Orr
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-06

3.  Clinical polysomnographic methods for estimating pharyngeal collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Daniel Vena; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ali Azarbarzin; Sara Op de Beeck; Melania Marques; Olivier M Vanderveken; Bradley A Edwards; Laura Gell; Nicole Calianese; Lauren B Hess; Reza Radmand; Garun S Hamilton; Simon A Joosten; Johan Verbraecken; Marc Braem; David P White; Susan Redline; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment Efficacy Is Associated with Polysomnographic Endotypes.

Authors:  Sara Op de Beeck; Marijke Dieltjens; Ali Azarbarzin; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Marc J Braem; Andrew Wellman; Scott A Sands; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-03

5.  It's possible: why don't we do it?

Authors:  Winfried Randerath
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.324

6.  Endotypic Mechanisms of Successful Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Sara Op de Beeck; Andrew Wellman; Marijke Dieltjens; Kingman P Strohl; Marc Willemen; Paul H Van de Heyning; Johan A Verbraecken; Olivier M Vanderveken; Scott A Sands
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Mandibular advancement device use in obstructive sleep apnea: ORCADES study 5-year follow-up data.

Authors:  Marie-Françoise Vecchierini; Valérie Attali; Jean-Marc Collet; Marie-Pia d'Ortho; Frederic Goutorbe; Jean-Baptiste Kerbrat; Damien Leger; Florent Lavergne; Christelle Monaca; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Eric Mullens; Bernard Pigearias; Francis Martin; Hauria Khemliche; Lionel Lerousseau; Jean-Claude Meurice
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

8.  Comparison of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Natural Sleep Endoscopy in the Assessment of Upper Airway Pathophysiology During Sleep: Protocol and Study Design.

Authors:  Karlien Van den Bossche; Eli Van de Perck; Andrew Wellman; Elahe Kazemeini; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Olivier M Vanderveken; Daniel Vena; Sara Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.